Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Public Statements

Prescription Drug and Medicare Improvement Act of 2003 - Continued

Location: Washington, DC



    Mr. HAGEL. Mr. President, in the last 2 weeks the Senate has engaged in an historic effort to reform and strengthen Medicare. When we opened this debate 2 weeks ago, I said that what we would do here debating this bill would affect every American and future generations.

    Health care is a defining issue for our Nation and future generations. Just a reminder: When Medicare was enacted in 1965, the Federal Government's lead actuary at that time projected that the hospital program, Medicare Part A, would grow to $9 billion by 1990. In fact, the program, in 1990, had then cost the taxpayers $66 billion. So we have some sense of how these programs can get out of hand if not defined clearly at the front end.

    In addition to the internal problems of the changing realities of health care, Medicare is facing a looming external problem. The largest generation in American history, the baby boomers, are aging. These Americans—over 75 million of them—will be added to the Medicare rolls over the next few years. The baby boom generation has changed and shaped every market it has ever entered. Medicare will be no exception. We have a responsibility to address this demographic pressure now or risk the system collapsing under its own weight in the future.

    Senator Ensign and I have come to the floor to offer an amendment to substitute only title I of the Finance Committee's bill, providing a prescription drug benefit for seniors. We believe any Medicare drug benefit must be sustainable for future generations. The benefit must deal with the realities that people are living longer and better and have higher health care expectations than ever before. We believe we can do better with our amendment.

    Our amendment is a simple amendment. Seniors will be able to understand it clearly. Unlike the underlying bill, our amendment contains no premiums, no deductibles, and no gaps in coverage. Our modified amendment addresses three of the major issues we have tried to deal with in constructing this plan. First, it helps low-income seniors, those who need it the most. Two, it protects seniors from high out-of-pocket expenses, and it eases the burden prescription drug costs have placed on the States.

    Our modified amendment would replace the prescription drug benefit in the Finance Committee plan with, No. 1, a prescription drug discount card for all seniors on Medicare with $30 billion in added funds for low-income seniors; No. 2, catastrophic coverage for all seniors; No. 3, $35 billion in cost-sharing for catastrophic drug costs with the States for the lowest income seniors eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid.

    We give the Secretary of Health and Human Services the discretion to divide $65 billion for seniors and for help with drug costs at the State level. With our amendment, the Secretary will provide low-income seniors with money on a drug discount card to help defray their drug expenses.

    States would also benefit under our amendment, and $35 billion is available to help States cover the catastrophic drug expenses for the dual eligibles. These are the very poorest of seniors.

    These modifications to the amendment make it stronger by targeting aid to those who need it the most. This bill has been scored. We fall within the $400 billion budget number that is required.

    This is a commonsense plan that is workable and responsible, and it addresses prescription drug concerns in the right way.


    Mr. HAGEL. Mr. President, in addition to what my colleague from Nevada has said in response to the distinguished Senator from Montana, there is nothing new about this bill except two features.

    This bill, the Hagel-Ensign bill, last year received more bipartisan votes on the floor of this Senate than any other bill. There is nothing new in this bill except two features. One is the $30 billion for low-income seniors' additional coverage, and the other is the $35 billion in cost sharing for catastrophic drug costs with Medicare and Medicaid to dual eligibles. That is what is new in the bill.

    To say this is new and we have just sprung this on the Senate is a bit disingenuous. This bill has been around for almost 4 years in its current form.

    I yield the floor.


    Mr. HAGEL. Mr. President, to summarize our amendment is simple: It helps those who need it most. It helps the States provide a discount drug card. It is affordable, with no monthly premiums, no deductibles, catastrophic coverage, and accountable market-based tools. It is a complete, affordable, discount drug plan that the next generation of this country can support. We can be proud of what we are doing for our seniors.

    I yield the floor.

Skip to top
Back to top