Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: National Stone, Sand & Gravel Association

2006 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Neil Abercrombie 56%
Gary Ackerman 32%
Daniel Akaka, Sr. 63%
Todd Akin 91%
Rodney Alexander 71%
Wayne Allard 85%
George Allen 100%
Thomas Allen 38%
Rob Andrews 47%
Joe Baca, Sr. 47%
Spencer Bachus 91%
Brian Baird 44%
Richard Hugh Baker 94%
J. Gresham Barrett 81%
John Barrow 63%
Roscoe Bartlett 100%
Charlie Bass 88%
Max Baucus 82%
Evan Bayh 67%
Melissa Bean 75%
Bob Beauprez 100%
Bob Bennett 89%
Shelley Berkley 53%
Howard Berman 32%
Marion Berry 56%
Judy Biggert 94%
Michael Bilirakis 94%
Jeff Bingaman 67%
Tim Bishop 43%
Sherwood Boehlert 85%
Kit Bond 100%
Henry Bonilla 97%
Jo Bonner, Jr. 95%
Mary Bono Mack 94%
Dan Boren 100%
Leonard Boswell 44%
Rick Boucher 50%
Allen Boyd, Jr. 53%
Henry Brown, Jr. 97%
Ginny Brown-Waite 76%
Jim Bunning 93%
Conrad Burns 96%
Dan Burton 88%
Steve Buyer 97%
Robert Byrd 70%
Dave Camp 97%
Chris Cannon 91%
Eric Cantor 94%
Dennis Cardoza 57%
Russ Carnahan 50%
Julia Carson 32%
Edward Case 67%
Mike Castle 68%
Linc Chafee 78%
Saxby Chambliss 75%
Ben Chandler III 50%
Chris Chocola 100%
Hillary Clinton 71%
Howard Coble 100%
Thomas Coburn 67%
Norm Coleman 75%
Kent Conrad 74%
Jerry Costello 59%
Larry Craig 82%
Robert Cramer 82%
Barbara Cubin 100%
Artur Davis 57%
Geoff Davis 100%
James Davis 35%
Jo Ann Davis 97%
Lincoln Davis 76%
Thomas Davis III 91%
Bill Delahunt 38%
Thomas DeLay 94%
James DeMint 50%
Lincoln Diaz-Balart 71%
Norm Dicks 32%
John Dingell 38%
Chris Dodd 63%
Elizabeth Dole 100%
Pete Domenici, Jr. 89%
John Doolittle 88%
Byron Dorgan 67%
Thelma Drake 100%
David Dreier 91%
Chet Edwards 62%
Vern Ehlers 94%
Jo Ann Emerson 88%
Philip English 94%
John Ensign 67%
Bob Etheridge 44%
Lane Evans 27%
Terry Everett 94%
Tom Feeney 76%
Russ Feingold 33%
Michael Ferguson 91%
Bob Filner 32%
Mark Foley 82%
Harold Ford, Jr. 53%
Vito Fossella, Jr. 91%
Barney Frank 38%
William Frist 82%
Elton Gallegly 88%
Jim Gerlach 91%
Jim Gibbons 91%
Wayne Gilchrest 85%
Paul Gillmor 91%
Phil Gingrey 91%
Charlie Gonzalez 47%
Virgil Goode, Jr. 94%
Bart Gordon 65%
Mark Green 91%
Judd Gregg 44%
Gilbert Gutknecht 94%
Charles Hagel 74%
Ralph Hall 94%
Tom Harkin 63%
Jane Harman 58%
Katherine Harris 81%
Melissa Hart 94%
J. Dennis Hastert 100%
Doc Hastings 100%
Robert Hayes 94%
J.D. Hayworth, Jr. 100%
Joel Hefley 82%
Wally Herger, Jr. 94%
Stephanie Herseth Sandlin 75%
Maurice Hinchey 38%
David Lee Hobson 94%
Pete Hoekstra 91%
Thomas Holden 47%
Rush Holt, Jr. 47%
Darlene Hooley 53%
John Nathan Hostettler 97%
Kenny Hulshof 88%
Duncan Hunter 94%
Kay Hutchison 44%
Henry Hyde 94%
Bob Inglis, Sr. 100%
Daniel Inouye 67%
Ernest Istook, Jr. 91%
Jesse Jackson, Jr. 38%
William Jefferson 47%
James Merrill Jeffords 78%
William Lewis Jenkins 97%
Nancy Johnson 82%
Tim Johnson 88%
Timothy Johnson 78%
Paul Kanjorski 41%
Ric Keller 88%
Sue Kelly 94%
Edward Kennedy, Sr. 63%
Mark Kennedy 100%
Patrick Kennedy 38%
Dale Kildee 38%
Carolyn Kilpatrick 38%
Jack Kingston 94%
Joseph Knollenberg 97%
Herb Kohl 52%
James Kolbe 91%
Dennis Kucinich 32%
John Kuhl, Jr. 100%
Jon Kyl 41%
Ray LaHood 82%
Mary Landrieu 93%
Tom Lantos 41%
Tom Latham 94%
Steve LaTourette 82%
Frank Lautenberg 79%
James Leach 71%
Carl Levin 67%
Jerry Lewis 94%
Ron Lewis 100%
Joe Lieberman 67%
Blanche Lincoln 89%
John Linder 94%
Trent Lott, Sr. 93%
Dick Lugar 93%
Dan Lungren 100%
Connie Mack IV 88%
Don Manzullo 94%
Jim Marshall 71%
Melquiades Martinez 92%
Jim Matheson 70%
Carolyn McCarthy 53%
Thaddeus McCotter 95%
James McCrery III 100%
John McHugh 82%
Mike McIntyre 59%
Buck McKeon 97%
Cynthia Ann McKinney 40%
Michael McNulty 41%
Martin Meehan 32%
Kendrick Meek, Sr. 32%
Charlie Melancon, Sr. 75%
Mike Michaud 48%
Juanita Millender-McDonald 38%
Gary Miller 91%
George Miller 27%
Brad Miller 43%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top