Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Californians for Population Stabilization

2001 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Neil Abercrombie 50%
Gary Ackerman 50%
Daniel Akaka, Sr. 100%
Todd Akin 50%
Wayne Allard 0%
George Allen 0%
Thomas Allen 50%
Rob Andrews 50%
Richard Armey 50%
Joe Baca, Sr. 50%
Spencer Bachus 100%
Brian Baird 50%
Richard Hugh Baker 100%
Cass Ballenger 100%
James Barcia 50%
Bob Barr, Jr. 0%
Roscoe Bartlett 100%
Charlie Bass 50%
Max Baucus 100%
Evan Bayh 100%
Bob Bennett 0%
Kenneth Bentsen, Jr. 50%
Douglas Bereuter 100%
Shelley Berkley 50%
Howard Berman 50%
Marion Berry 50%
Judy Biggert 50%
Michael Bilirakis 50%
Jeff Bingaman 100%
Rod Blagojevich 50%
Sherwood Boehlert 50%
Kit Bond 0%
Henry Bonilla 50%
David Edward Bonior 50%
Mary Bono Mack 50%
Robert Borski, Jr. 50%
Leonard Boswell 50%
Rick Boucher 50%
Allen Boyd, Jr. 50%
John Breaux 0%
Henry Brown, Jr. 50%
Ed Bryant 50%
Jim Bunning 0%
Conrad Burns 0%
Dan Burton 100%
Steve Buyer 50%
Robert Byrd 100%
Herbert Callahan 50%
Dave Camp 50%
Ben Campbell 0%
Chris Cannon 50%
Eric Cantor 50%
Jean Carnahan 100%
Brad Carson 50%
Julia Carson 50%
Mike Castle 50%
Linc Chafee 0%
Eva Clayton 50%
Joseph Maxwell Cleland 0%
Robert Clement 50%
Hillary Clinton 100%
Howard Coble 50%
Michael Collins 0%
Larry Combest 100%
Gary Condit 50%
Kent Conrad 100%
John Cooksey 50%
Jon Corzine 100%
Jerry Costello 0%
Christopher Cox 50%
William Coyne 50%
Larry Craig 0%
Robert Cramer 50%
Philip Crane 50%
Barbara Cubin 50%
Randall Cunningham 50%
Thomas Daschle 100%
James Davis 50%
Jo Ann Davis 50%
Thomas Davis III 50%
Bill Delahunt 50%
Thomas DeLay 50%
James DeMint 50%
Peter Deutsch 50%
Lincoln Diaz-Balart 50%
Norm Dicks 50%
John Dingell 50%
Chris Dodd 100%
Pete Domenici, Jr. 0%
Calvin Dooley 50%
John Doolittle 50%
Byron Dorgan 100%
David Dreier 50%
Jennifer Dunn 50%
John Edwards 100%
Chet Edwards 50%
Vern Ehlers 50%
Bob Ehrlich, Jr. 50%
Jo Ann Emerson 50%
Philip English 50%
John Ensign 0%
Bob Etheridge 50%
Lane Evans 50%
Terry Everett 100%
Russ Feingold 100%
Michael Ferguson 50%
Bob Filner 0%
Peter Fitzgerald 0%
Ernest Fletcher 50%
Mark Foley 50%
Harold Ford, Jr. 50%
Vito Fossella, Jr. 50%
Barney Frank 50%
William Frist 0%
Jonas Frost III 50%
Elton Gallegly 50%
John Ganske 50%
George Gekas 50%
Richard Andrew Gephardt 50%
Jim Gibbons 50%
Wayne Gilchrest 50%
Paul Gillmor 50%
Benjamin Gilman 50%
Charlie Gonzalez 50%
Virgil Goode, Jr. 100%
Bart Gordon 50%
Porter Goss 50%
Daniel Graham 100%
William Phillip Gramm 0%
Mark Green 50%
James Greenwood 50%
Judd Gregg 0%
Felix Grucci, Jr. 0%
Gilbert Gutknecht 100%
Charles Hagel 0%
Ralph Hall 50%
Tony Hall 50%
James Hansen 50%
Tom Harkin 100%
Jane Harman 50%
Melissa Hart 50%
Doc Hastings 50%
Robert Hayes 100%
J.D. Hayworth, Jr. 50%
Joel Hefley 100%
Jesse Helms 0%
Wally Herger, Jr. 100%
Baron Hill 50%
Van Hilleary 50%
Earl Hilliard, Jr. 50%
Maurice Hinchey 50%
David Lee Hobson 50%
PA Commissioner At-Large Joseph Hoeffel 50%
Pete Hoekstra 50%
Thomas Holden 50%
Ernest Hollings 100%
Rush Holt, Jr. 50%
Darlene Hooley 50%
Stephen Horn 50%
John Nathan Hostettler 0%
Amory Houghton, Jr. 50%
Kenny Hulshof 50%
Duncan Hunter 100%
Y. Tim Hutchinson 0%
Kay Hutchison 0%
Henry Hyde 50%
Daniel Inouye 100%
Ernest Istook, Jr. 50%
Jesse Jackson, Jr. 50%
William Jefferson 50%
James Merrill Jeffords 0%
William Lewis Jenkins 50%
Christopher John 50%
Nancy Johnson 50%
Tim Johnson 50%
Timothy Johnson 100%
Paul Kanjorski 50%
Ric Keller 50%
Sue Kelly 50%
Edward Kennedy, Sr. 100%
Mark Kennedy 50%
Patrick Kennedy 50%
Brian Kerns 50%
Dale Kildee 50%
Carolyn Kilpatrick 50%
Jack Kingston 50%
Gerald Kleczka 50%
Joseph Knollenberg 50%
Herb Kohl 100%
James Kolbe 50%
Dennis Kucinich 50%
Jon Kyl 0%
John LaFalce 50%
Ray LaHood 50%
Nicholas Lampson 50%
Mary Landrieu 0%
Tom Lantos 50%
Tom Latham 50%
Steve LaTourette 50%
James Leach 50%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top