| State | Office | District | Name | Party | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Armstrong | 100% | ||||
| Robert Belfanti, Jr. | 100% | ||||
| Jerry Birmelin | 100% | ||||
| Teresa Brown | 100% | ||||
| Joe Conti | 100% | ||||
| Jeffrey Coy | 100% | ||||
| Thomas Dempsey | 100% | ||||
| Allan Egolf | 100% | ||||
| Russell Fairchild | 100% | ||||
| Patrick Elvin Fleagle | 100% | ||||
| PA | State House | 76 | Michael Hanna, Sr. | Democratic | 100% |
| Dennis Leh | 100% | ||||
| Victor John Lescovitz | 100% | ||||
| Edward Lucyk | 100% | ||||
| Stephen Maitland | 100% | ||||
| PA | State Senate | 10 | Charles McIlhinney, Jr. | Republican | 100% |
| Jane Clare Orie | 100% | ||||
| Thomas Petrone | 100% | ||||
| PA | State Senate | 50 | Robert Robbins | Republican | 100% |
| Lawrence Roberts | 100% | ||||
| Samuel Rohrer | 100% | ||||
| Jere Schuler | 100% | ||||
| James Shaner | 100% | ||||
| PA | State House | 66 | Samuel Smith | Republican | 100% |
| Edward Staback | 100% | ||||
| Thomas Stevenson | 100% | ||||
| Dan Surra | 100% | ||||
| Fred Trello | 100% | ||||
| Rod Wilt | 100% | ||||
| Matthew Wright | 100% | ||||
| Thomas Yewcic | 100% | ||||
| Mark Steven McNaughton | 92% | ||||
| Timothy Pesci | 92% | ||||
| Tracy Seyfert | 92% | ||||
| Jess Stairs | 92% | ||||
| Frank Tulli, Jr. | 92% | ||||
| PA | State House | 105 | Ronald Marsico | Republican | 91% |
| Camille George | 85% | ||||
| Frank Oliver, Sr. | 85% | ||||
| Peter Zug | 85% | ||||
| Jacob Doyle Corman II | 77% | ||||
| Leroy Zimmerman | 77% | ||||
| Gaynor Cawley | 69% | ||||
| PA | State House | 9 | Chris Sainato | Democratic | 60% |
| PA | State House | 160 | Steve Barrar | Republican | 50% |
| Robert Mellow | 45% | ||||
| Babette Josephs | 0% |
Issues:
Guns
How to Interpret these Evaluations
Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.
Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.
