| State | Office | District | Name | Party | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Armstrong | 100% | ||||
| Robert Belfanti, Jr. | 100% | ||||
| Jerry Birmelin | 100% | ||||
| Teresa Brown | 100% | ||||
| Gaynor Cawley | 69% | ||||
| Joe Conti | 100% | ||||
| Jacob Doyle Corman II | 77% | ||||
| Jeffrey Coy | 100% | ||||
| Thomas Dempsey | 100% | ||||
| Allan Egolf | 100% | ||||
| Russell Fairchild | 100% | ||||
| Patrick Elvin Fleagle | 100% | ||||
| Camille George | 85% | ||||
| Babette Josephs | 0% | ||||
| Dennis Leh | 100% | ||||
| Victor John Lescovitz | 100% | ||||
| Edward Lucyk | 100% | ||||
| Stephen Maitland | 100% | ||||
| Mark Steven McNaughton | 92% | ||||
| Robert Mellow | 45% | ||||
| Frank Oliver, Sr. | 85% | ||||
| Jane Clare Orie | 100% | ||||
| Timothy Pesci | 92% | ||||
| Thomas Petrone | 100% | ||||
| Lawrence Roberts | 100% | ||||
| Samuel Rohrer | 100% | ||||
| Jere Schuler | 100% | ||||
| Tracy Seyfert | 92% | ||||
| James Shaner | 100% | ||||
| Edward Staback | 100% | ||||
| Jess Stairs | 92% | ||||
| Thomas Stevenson | 100% | ||||
| Dan Surra | 100% | ||||
| Fred Trello | 100% | ||||
| Frank Tulli, Jr. | 92% | ||||
| Rod Wilt | 100% | ||||
| Matthew Wright | 100% | ||||
| Thomas Yewcic | 100% | ||||
| Leroy Zimmerman | 77% | ||||
| Peter Zug | 85% | ||||
| PA | State House | 76 | Michael Hanna, Sr. | Democratic | 100% |
| PA | State House | 9 | Chris Sainato | Democratic | 60% |
| PA | State House | 160 | Steve Barrar | Republican | 50% |
| PA | State House | 105 | Ronald Marsico | Republican | 91% |
| PA | State Senate | 10 | Charles McIlhinney, Jr. | Republican | 100% |
| PA | State Senate | 50 | Robert Robbins | Republican | 100% |
| PA | State House | 66 | Samuel Smith | Republican | 100% |
Issues:
Guns
How to Interpret these Evaluations
Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.
Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.
