Rating Group: Maine Education Association

1997-1998 Positions

Issues: Education
State Office Name Party Rating
ME U.S. House-1 Chellie Pingree D 100%
ME U.S. House-2 Mike Michaud D 86%
ME State House-10 Stephen Stanley D 100%
ME State House-40 Richard Campbell R 38%
ME State House-42 Joseph Brooks Other 91%
ME State House-69 Brian Bolduc D 82%
ME State House-79 Sharon Treat D 100%
ME State House-95 Tom Winsor R 18%
ME State Senate-3 John Tuttle, Jr. D 78%
ME Justice of the Supreme Court Joseph Jabar, Sr. Other 91%
ME Commissioner-1 Beverly Daggett Other 100%
ME Commissioner-3 Stephen Stanley Other 100%
I. Joel Abromson Other 29%
Douglas Ahearne Other 100%
Jane Amero Other 29%
Martha Bagley Other 100%
Christina Baker Other 100%
Irvin Belanger Other 80%
Richard Bennett Other 43%
John Benoit Other 50%
Donald Berry, Sr. Other 64%
Randall Berry Other 100%
Gerald Bouffard Other 91%
Tarren Bragdon Other 20%
Michael Brennan Other 100%
Joseph Bruno Other 64%
Bruce Bryant Other 100%
John Buck Other 0%
Thomas Bull Other 100%
Randall Bumps Other 37%
Robert Cameron Other 55%
Richard Carey Other 83%
Vinton Cassidy Other 67%
Mary Cathcart Other 100%
Howard Chick Other 55%
Nancy Chizmar Other 80%
Peter Cianchette Other 45%
Joseph Clark Other 100%
Patrick Colwell Other 100%
Scott Cowger Other 100%
Ruel Parkman Cross Other 40%
Thomas Marshall Davidson Other 100%
Mabel Desmond Other 100%
Matthew Dunlap Other 100%
David Etnier Other 100%
Norman Ferguson, Jr. Other 43%
Charles Fisher Other 100%
Clifton Foster Other 10%
Roger Frechette Other 91%
Elaine Fuller Other 89%
Rosita Gagne-Friel Other 100%
Kenneth Gagnon Other 100%
Belinda Gerry Other 36%
Jill Murdoch Goldthwait Other 14%
Albion Goodwin Other 64%
Walter Gooley Other 55%
Bonnie Raye Green Other 100%
Philip Harriman Other 29%
Pamela Hatch Other 100%
Kenneth Honey Other 60%
Sumner Jones, Jr. Other 37%
Henry Joy Other 18%
Thomas Kane Other 100%
Susan Kasprzak Other 0%
R. Leo Kieffer Other 37%
Marjorie Kilkelly Other 100%
Richard Kneeland Other 45%
Carol Kontos Other 100%
Janice LaBrecque Other 55%
Lloyd LaFountain III Other 100%
Charles LaVerdiere Other 100%
Mark Lawrence Other 100%
Kenneth Lemont Other 89%
James Libby Other 43%
David Lindahl Other 37%
Susan Walsh Longley Other 100%
Glenys Lovett Other 60%
Jay MacDougall Other 10%
Adam Mack Other 9%
Bruce MacKinnon Other 71%
David Madore Other 64%
Richard Mailhot Other 91%
Jean Ginn Marvin Other 27%
Arthur Mayo III Other 82%
Michael McAlevey Other 50%
Linda Rogers McKee Other 100%
S. Peter Mills Other 29%
Betty Lou Mitchell Other 20%
Thomas Murphy, Jr. Other 55%
Robert Murray, Jr. Other 100%
Christopher Muse Other 100%
Richard Nass Other 18%
John Nutting VII Other 71%
Julie O'Brien Other 78%
William O'Gara Other 100%
Gary O'Neal Other 100%
Christopher O'Neil Other 100%
Judy Paradis Other 100%
Judith Peavey Other 55%
Peggy Pendleton Other 83%
Royce Perkins Other 36%
Joseph Perry Other 80%
Wendy Pieh Other 91%
William Pinkham Other 9%
Debra Plowman Other 38%
Edward Povich Other 91%
Judith Powers Other 100%
Michael Quint Other 100%
Anne Rand Other 100%
Shirley Richard Other 100%
Benjamin Rines, Jr. Other 90%
G. Steven Rowe Other 100%
Richard Ruhlin Other 86%
Roland Samson Other 100%
Laura Sanborn Other 100%
Christine Savage Other 55%
Jane Saxl Other 100%
Michael Saxl Other 100%
David Shiah Other 100%
Rosaire Sirois Other 100%
James Skoglund Other 91%
Mary Small Other 43%
Lois Snowe-Mello Other 18%
Vaughn Stedman Other 27%
Kathleen Alicia Stevens Other 100%
Paul Leo Tessier Other 100%
Richard Thompson Other 100%
James Tobin, Jr. Other 18%
Elizabeth Townsend Other 100%
Russell Treadwell Other 20%
Verdi Tripp Other 100%
Harry True Other 40%
Ronald Usher Other 100%
Paul Volenik Other 91%
G. Paul Waterhouse Other 0%
Elizabeth Watson Other 100%
Edgar Wheeler Other 37%
Gary Wheeler Other 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.