or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Maine Education Association

1999-2000 Positions

Issues: Education
State Office District Name Party Rating
ME U.S. House 2 Mike Michaud Democratic 100%
ME State House 10 Stephen Stanley Democratic 90%
ME State House 26 Paul Davis, Sr. Republican 50%
ME State House 42 Joseph Brooks Unaffiliated 100%
ME State House 78 Robert Nutting Republican 20%
ME State House 79 Sharon Treat Democratic 100%
ME State House 95 Tom Winsor Republican 20%
ME State Senate 2 Ron Collins Republican 20%
ME State Senate 3 John Tuttle, Jr. Democratic 90%
ME State Senate 34 Roger Sherman Republican 60%
ME Secretary of State Matthew Dunlap Democratic 90%
ME Commissioner 1 Beverly Daggett 100%
ME Treasurer Neria Douglass 100%
I. Joel Abromson 0%
Mary Black Andrews 20%
Martha Bagley 90%
Christina Baker 90%
Irvin Belanger 30%
Richard Bennett 50%
Donald Berry, Sr. 60%
Randall Berry 100%
Gerald Bouffard 80%
David Bowles 20%
Joseph Bruno 40%
Bruce Bryant 100%
John Buck 10%
Thomas Bull 90%
Randall Bumps 13%
Roderick Carr 60%
Mary Cathcart 100%
Howard Chick 60%
Nancy Chizmar 89%
Joseph Clark 100%
Harold Clough 10%
Patrick Colwell 100%
William Cote 78%
Scott Cowger 100%
Robert A. Daigle 40%
Gerald Davis 90%
Mabel Desmond 70%
Benjamin Dudley 90%
Edward Dugay 100%
Richard Duncan 10%
Robert Duplessie 100%
David Etnier 90%
Norman Ferguson, Jr. 50%
Charles Fisher 100%
Clifton Foster 0%
Elaine Fuller 100%
Rosita Gagne-Friel 90%
Kenneth Gagnon 100%
Kevin Glynn 0%
Jill Murdoch Goldthwait 100%
Albion Goodwin 100%
Walter Gooley 40%
Bonnie Raye Green 100%
Paul Hatch 100%
Theodore Heidrich 10%
Kenneth Honey 40%
Patricia Jacobs 90%
Arlan Jodrey 20%
Thomas Kane 100%
Susan Kasprzak 22%
Marjorie Kilkelly 100%
Richard Kneeland 25%
Janice LaBrecque 22%
Lloyd LaFountain III 50%
Charles LaVerdiere 90%
David Lemoine 80%
Kenneth Lemont 44%
Sharon Libby Jones 25%
Susan Walsh Longley 100%
Glenys Lovett 30%
Jay MacDougall 20%
David Madore 44%
Richard Mailhot 80%
John Martin 86%
Zachary E Matthews 100%
Arthur Mayo III 88%
Michael McAlevey 50%
John McDonough 100%
Monica McGlocklin 90%
Linda Rogers McKee 88%
Terrence McKenney 10%
Deborah Kaler McNeil 30%
Stavros Mendros 20%
S. Peter Mills 50%
Charles Mitchell 100%
Eleanor Murphy 38%
Thomas Murphy, Jr. 20%
Christopher Muse 71%
Richard Nass 20%
William Norbert 89%
John Nutting VII 100%
Julie O'Brien 56%
Lillian LaFontaine O'Brien 100%
William O'Gara 50%
Christopher O'Neil 100%
Judith Peavey 60%
Peggy Pendleton 100%
Royce Perkins 60%
Joseph Perry 100%
William Pinkham 10%
Edward Povich 100%
Michael Quint 78%
Anne Rand 100%
Shirley Richard 80%
John Richardson 84%
Richard Rosen 44%
Christine Savage 38%
William Savage 80%
Michael Saxl 90%
William Schneider 10%
Thomas Shields 11%
Kevin Shorey 25%
James Skoglund 89%
Mary Small 0%
Lois Snowe-Mello 10%
Vaughn Stedman 11%
Nancy Sullivan 100%
Paul Leo Tessier 100%
David Tobin 40%
James Tobin, Jr. 20%
Richard Tracy 90%
A. David Trahan 30%
Russell Treadwell 10%
Joanne Twomey 100%
Ronald Usher 89%
Paul Volenik 90%
G. Paul Waterhouse 20%
Elizabeth Watson 86%
Carol Weston 20%
Edgar Wheeler 30%
Gary Wheeler 78%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top