Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Maine League of Conservation Voters

2011 Lifetime Score

Issues: Environment
State Office District Name Party Rating
ME State House 13 George Hogan Democratic 88%
ME State House 24 Mark Bryant Democratic 92%
ME State House 55 Seth Berry Democratic 95%
ME State House 56 Dale Crafts Republican 10%
ME State House 63 Bruce Bickford Republican 30%
ME State House 68 Richard Cebra Republican 42%
ME State House 71 Tom Winsor Republican 9%
ME State House 107 Jeffrey McCabe Democratic 100%
ME State House 110 Henry Beck Democratic 90%
ME State House 113 Lance Harvell Republican 20%
ME State House 115 Matthew Peterson Democratic 100%
ME State House 121 Robert Duchesne Democratic 97%
ME State House 127 Adam Goode Democratic 90%
ME State House 144 Roger Sherman Republican 26%
ME State House 151 John Martin Democratic 74%
ME State Senate 1 Troy Jackson Democratic 69%
ME State Senate 4 Paul Davis, Sr. Republican 23%
ME State Senate 7 Brian Langley Republican 30%
ME State Senate 8 Kim Rosen Republican 53%
ME State Senate 10 Andre Cushing III Republican 20%
ME State Senate 11 Mike Thibodeau Republican 40%
ME State Senate 13 Dana Dow Republican 60%
ME State Senate 17 Tom Saviello Republican 63%
ME State Senate 19 James Hamper Republican 42%
ME State Senate 26 Bill Diamond Democratic 87%
ME State Senate 34 Ron Collins Republican 20%
ME State Senate 35 Dawn Hill Democratic 95%
ME Commissioner of Administrative and Financial Services Richard Rosen 43%
ME Council Member At-Large Jon Hinck 100%
ME Commissioner 3 Dean Cray Republican 50%
ME Councilor Ward 4 Anna Blodgett 100%
Justin Alfond 100%
Bernard Ayotte 20%
Philip Bartlett II 91%
Paulette Beaudoin 95%
Michael Beaulieu 65%
Andrea Boland 90%
Brian Bolduc 83%
Joseph Brannigan 82%
Sheryl Briggs 100%
David Burns 10%
Emily Cain 90%
Michael Carey 100%
Alan Casavant 95%
Michael Celli 30%
Kathleen Chase 50%
Herbert Clark 44%
Tyler Clark 40%
Alexander Cornell du Houx 90%
H. David Cotta 40%
Jonathan Courtney 40%
Margaret Craven 90%
Jarrod Crockett 30%
Philip Curtis 34%
Cynthia Dill 70%
Timothy Driscoll 91%
Jane Eberle 97%
Peter Edgecomb 48%
Mark Eves 90%
Stacey Fitts 42%
Elspeth Flemings 100%
Patrick Flood 53%
Les Fossel 40%
Stan Gerzofsky 86%
Jeffery Gifford 20%
Paul Gilbert 100%
Seth Goodall 100%
Stephen Hanley 76%
Anne Haskell 70%
David Hastings III 53%
Teresea Hayes 80%
Barry Hobbins 85%
Robert Hunt 100%
Melissa Innes 100%
David Johnson 30%
Bryan Kaenrath 80%
Peter Kent 70%
Jane Knapp 40%
L. Gary Knight 50%
Chuck Kruger 100%
Michel Lajoie 100%
Stephen Lovejoy 100%
W. Bruce MacDonald 95%
Edward Mazurek 85%
Earle McCormick 55%
Howard McFadden 31%
Jonathan McKane 54%
Terry Morrison 100%
Bradley Moulton 42%
Joan Nass 47%
Mary Nelson 100%
Robert Nutting 33%
Andrew O'Brien 100%
John Patrick 77%
Ann Peoples 85%
Donald Pilon 85%
Debra Plowman 34%
Gary Plummer 51%
Kerri Prescott 55%
Charles Priest 94%
Helen Rankin 100%
Kevin Raye 61%
Christopher Rector 70%
David Richardson 58%
Wesley Richardson 57%
Margaret Rotundo 100%
Linda Sanborn 100%
Ralph Sarty, Jr. 55%
Elizabeth Schneider 82%
Michael Shaw 80%
Lois Snowe-Mello 28%
Sara Stevens 90%
Peter Stuckey 90%
Nancy Sullivan 88%
Charles Theriault 90%
Douglas Thomas 20%
Dianne Tilton 40%
A. David Trahan 39%
Sharon Treat 99%
John Tuttle, Jr. 70%
Linda Valentino 91%
Richard Wagner 100%
G. Paul Waterhouse 13%
Windol Weaver 55%
David Webster 91%
Joan Welsh 100%
Michael Willette 70%
Richard Woodbury 83%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top