Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Maine League of Conservation Voters

2007-2008 Positions

Issues: Environment
State Office District Name Party Rating
ME State House 13 George Hogan Democratic 80%
ME State House 14 Barry Hobbins Democratic 83%
ME State House 21 James Campbell, Sr. Republican 80%
ME State House 24 Mark Bryant Democratic 100%
ME State House 59 Margaret Rotundo Democratic 100%
ME State House 67 Susan Austin Republican 80%
ME State House 121 Robert Duchesne Democratic 100%
ME State House 144 Roger Sherman Republican 67%
ME State House 151 John Martin Democratic 100%
ME State Senate 1 Peter Edgecomb Republican 70%
ME State Senate 6 David Burns Republican 100%
ME State Senate 8 Kim Rosen Republican 80%
ME State Senate 11 Mike Thibodeau Republican 60%
ME State Senate 14 Earle McCormick Republican 83%
ME State Senate 17 Thomas Saviello Republican 78%
ME State Senate 19 James Hamper Republican 70%
ME State Senate 26 Bill Diamond Democratic 83%
ME State Senate 27 Douglas Thomas Republican 50%
ME State Senate 28 Anne Haskell Democratic 60%
ME State Senate 31 Linda Valentino Democratic 90%
ME State Senate 35 Dawn Hill Democratic 90%
ME Commissioner of Administrative and Financial Services Richard Rosen No Party Affiliation 67%
ME Councilor At-Large Jon Hinck Democratic 100%
Herbert Adams 90%
Bernard Ayotte 30%
Philip Bartlett II 83%
Stephen Beaudette 90%
Paulette Beaudoin 90%
Michael Beaulieu 90%
Seth Berry 90%
Richard Blanchard 70%
Andrea Boland 90%
Peter Bowman 83%
Joseph Brannigan 67%
Sheryl Briggs 100%
William Browne 80%
Bruce Bryant 83%
Emily Ann Cain 90%
Michael Carey 100%
Alan Casavant 90%
Richard Cebra 70%
Kathleen Chase 60%
Herbert Clark 60%
Richard Cleary 80%
Gary Connor 60%
H. David Cotta 60%
Jonathan Courtney 67%
Dean Cray 60%
Philip Curtis 40%
Dennis Damon 83%
Cynthia Dill 60%
Timothy Driscoll 100%
Robert Eaton 100%
Jane Eberle 100%
Edward Finch 90%
Stacey Fitts 70%
Kenneth Fletcher 80%
Patrick Flood 70%
Patsy Garside Crockett 90%
Jeffery Gifford 30%
Jayne Crosby Giles 70%
Walter Gooley 83%
Christian Greeley 70%
Stephen Hanley 90%
Charles Harlow 90%
David Hastings III 67%
Teresea Hayes 90%
Peter Johnson 40%
Patricia Jones 100%
Henry Joy 20%
Bryan Kaenrath 70%
L. Gary Knight 60%
Sarah Lewin 70%
W. Bruce MacDonald 90%
Lisa Marraché 83%
Edward Mazurek 80%
Howard McFadden 30%
Jonathan McKane 80%
Everett McLeod, Sr. 30%
Elizabeth Miller 100%
Sawin Millett, Jr. 80%
S. Peter Mills 100%
Elizabeth Mitchell 100%
Joan Nass 70%
Richard Nass 67%
John Nutting VII 83%
Peggy Pendleton 80%
Ann Peoples 90%
Leila Percy 90%
Anne Perry 90%
Joseph Perry 83%
Wendy Pieh 90%
Donald Pilon 90%
Wright Pinkham, Sr. 70%
John Piotti 100%
Debra Plowman 83%
Gary Plummer 80%
Benjamin Pratt 60%
Kerri Prescott 80%
Charles Priest 100%
Kevin Raye 83%
David Richardson 90%
Wesley Richardson 90%
John Robinson 50%
Ralph Sarty, Jr. 80%
M. Schatz 100%
Elizabeth Schneider 83%
Larry Sirois 90%
Douglas Smith 50%
Nancy Smith 80%
Meredith Strang Burgess 80%
Nancy Sullivan 83%
Patricia Sutherland 100%
Richard Sykes 80%
Joshua Tardy 70%
Charles Theriault 80%
Sharon Treat 100%
Pamela Trinward 80%
John Tuttle, Jr. 90%
Richard Wagner 100%
Thomas Watson 80%
Windol Weaver 80%
David Webster 90%
Carol Weston 83%
Walter Wheeler, Sr. 90%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top