Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Missouri Progressive Vote Coalition

2006 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
MO U.S. House 8 Jason Smith Republican 0%
MO State Senate 8 Will Kraus Republican 20%
MO State Senate 13 Gina Walsh Democratic 88%
MO State Senate 14 Maria Chappelle-Nadal Democratic 100%
MO State Senate 17 Ryan Silvey Republican 40%
MO State Senate 18 Brian Munzlinger Republican 10%
MO State Senate 20 Jay Wasson Republican 14%
MO State Senate 21 David Pearce Republican 30%
MO State Senate 23 Tom Dempsey Republican 10%
MO State Senate 28 Mike Parson Republican 0%
MO State Senate 29 David Sater Republican 0%
MO State Senate 30 Bob Dixon Republican 10%
MO State Senate 31 Edgar Emery Republican 0%
MO State Senate 32 Ron Richard Republican 10%
MO State Senate 33 Mike Cunningham Republican 10%
MO State Senate 34 Robert Schaaf Republican 11%
MO Alderman Ward 11 Thomas Villa 90%
MO Council Member 2 Curt Dougherty 88%
MO Commissioner At-Large Steve Hobbs 20%
MO Commissioner At-Large Jerry Nolte 20%
MO Commissioner At-Large Rodney Schad 0%
MO Commissioner At-Large Raymond Weter 10%
MO Commissioner At-Large Dennis Wood 10%
MO Treasurer Clint Zweifel Democratic 100%
MO County Council 2 Sam Page 100%
Joe Aull 90%
James Avery, Jr. 33%
Brian Baker 20%
Judy Baker 100%
Carl Bearden 0%
Robert Behnen 10%
Walter Bivins, Jr. 10%
Lanie Black III 33%
Craig Bland 100%
Jane Bogetto 100%
John Bowman, Sr. 100%
Amber Boykins 100%
Rachel Bringer 70%
Sharon Sanders Brooks 100%
Michael Brown 89%
Mark Bruns 0%
John Patrick Burnett 100%
Ron Casey 70%
Kathy Chinn 0%
Nathan Cooper 20%
Robert Wayne Cooper 0%
Shannon Cooper 20%
Michael Corcoran 90%
Jane Cunningham 0%
Melba Curls 100%
Charles Dake 67%
Bruce David Darrough 100%
Michael Daus 100%
Cynthia Davis 10%
David Day 0%
Bill Deeken 20%
Charles Denison 0%
Mike Dethrow 0%
Margaret Donnelly 100%
Gary Dusenberg 20%
Yaphett El-Amin 100%
Douglas Ervin 0%
Sally Faith 0%
Kathlyn Fares 50%
Barney Fisher 10%
Timothy Flook 10%
Michael Frame 100%
Ward Franz 11%
Barbara Fraser 100%
Thomas George 88%
Jim Guest 40%
Belinda Harris 70%
Robert Harris 100%
Esther Hill Haywood 100%
Wayne Henke 70%
Theodore Hoskins 67%
Rodney Hubbard 44%
Leonard Hughes IV 100%
Steve Hunter 0%
Allen Icet 0%
Jack Jackson 0%
Rodney Jetton 0%
Connie Johnson 100%
Richard Johnson 100%
Robert Thane Johnson 90%
Cathy Jolly 100%
Kenny Jones 10%
Van Kelly 22%
Gayle Kingery 10%
Fred Kratky 89%
J.C. Kuessner 80%
Brad Lager 20%
Sara Lampe 90%
Jim Lembke 30%
Paul LeVota 100%
Albert Joseph Liese 70%
Scott Lipke 10%
Tom Loehner 11%
Beth Low 100%
Jenee Lowe 100%
B. J. Marsh 0%
Bob May 0%
Mike McGhee 40%
Timothy Meadows 67%
Kate Meiners 89%
Danielle Moore 11%
JMO Mott Oxford 100%
T. Scott Muschany 0%
Peter Myers, Jr. 0%
Bob Nance 10%
Brian Nieves 0%
Sherman Parker 67%
Susan Phillips 0%
Darrell Pollock 0%
Charles Portwood 10%
Bryan Pratt 10%
John Quinn 10%
Rex Rector 0%
Bradley Roark 0%
Edward Robb 30%
Brad Robinson 90%
Jeff Roorda 88%
Martin Rucker 88%
Marilyn Ruestman 0%
Ray Salva 75%
Therese Sander 11%
Dwight Scharnhorst 0%
Charles Schlottach 20%
Vicki Schneider 63%
Sue Schoemehl 80%
Tom Self 0%
Wes Shoemyer 70%
Trent Skaggs 100%
Joseph Smith 10%
Todd Smith 0%
Michael Spreng 80%
Bryan Stevenson 0%
Neal St. Onge 10%
Rachel Storch 100%
Mike Sutherland 10%
Terry Swinger 57%
Kevin Threlkeld 10%
Steven Tilley 10%
James Viebrock 0%
Michael Vogt 89%
Wes Wagner 89%
Maynard Wallace 40%
Juanita Walton 100%
Don Wells 0%
James Whorton 80%
H. Edward Wildberger 90%
Kevin Wilson 10%
Larry Wilson 0%
Terry Witte 90%
Billy Pat Wright 0%
Mark Wright 20%
Robin Wright-Jones 100%
Patricia Yaeger 80%
Brian David Yates 20%
Terry Young 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top