Rating Group: Wyoming AFL-CIO

2003 Positions

Issues: Labor Unions
State Office Name Party Rating
WY U.S. Senate-Jr John Barrasso R 80%
WY State House-1 Mark Semlek R 70%
WY State House-26 Elaine Harvey R 90%
WY State House-37 Steve Harshman R 89%
WY State House-51 Rosie Berger R 80%
WY State House-55 David Miller R 80%
WY State House-57 Thomas Lockhart R 80%
WY State Senate-2 James Anderson R 80%
WY State Senate-3 Curt Meier R 78%
WY State Senate-8 Floyd Esquibel D 90%
WY State Senate-18 Henry Coe R 80%
WY State Senate-20 Gerald Geis R 30%
WY State Senate-21 Bruce Burns R 90%
WY State Senate-23 John Hines R 70%
WY State Senate-25 Cale Case R 40%
WY State Senate-30 Charles Scott R 80%
Deborah Alden 80%
Rodney Anderson 90%
George Bagby 90%
Tex Boggs 100%
Bob Brechtel 60%
Ed Buchanan 90%
Kurt Bucholz 80%
Charles Childers 89%
Roy Cohee 80%
Ken Decaria 90%
Ross Diercks 80%
David Edwards 90%
Mary Meyer Gilmore 90%
James Hageman 90%
John Hanes 80%
Bill Hawks 70%
Becket Hinckley 90%
Jerry Iekel 78%
Pete Illoway 90%
Rae Lynn Job 100%
Alan Jones 60%
Peter Jorgensen 90%
Jack Landon, Jr. 80%
Grant Larson 60%
Frank Latta 60%
Randall Luthi 90%
Marty Martin 100%
Mike Massie 80%
Del McOmie 70%
R. Larry Meuli 90%
E. Jayne Mockler 70%
Layton Morgan 90%
Monte Olsen 70%
Douglas Osborn 70%
Robert Peck 80%
Owen Petersen 80%
Frank Philp 67%
Mick Powers 80%
Paul Wayne Reese 70%
Ann Robinson 100%
John Schiffer 70%
Kathryn Sessions 90%
Colin Simpson 90%
James Slater 90%
Bill Thompson 90%
Bill Vasey 90%
Tom Walsh 90%
Jane Warren 90%
Jeff Wasserburger 88%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.