Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: American Lands Alliance

2003-2004 Positions

Issues: Environment
State Office District Name Party Rating
Gary Ackerman 100%
Daniel Akaka, Sr. 89%
Todd Akin 0%
Rodney Alexander 0%
Wayne Allard 0%
George Allen 0%
Thomas Allen 100%
Rob Andrews 100%
Joe Baca, Sr. 40%
Brian Baird 70%
Richard Hugh Baker 0%
J. Gresham Barrett 0%
Roscoe Bartlett 10%
Charlie Bass 40%
Max Baucus 22%
Evan Bayh 100%
Bob Beauprez 0%
Bob Bennett 0%
Shelley Berkley 80%
Howard Berman 83%
Marion Berry 0%
Judy Biggert 20%
Michael Bilirakis 10%
Jeff Bingaman 89%
Sherwood Boehlert 50%
Kit Bond 0%
Henry Bonilla 0%
Jo Bonner, Jr. 0%
Mary Bono Mack 10%
Leonard Boswell 38%
Rick Boucher 90%
Allen Boyd, Jr. 10%
Henry Brown, Jr. 0%
Ginny Brown-Waite 0%
Jim Bunning 0%
Conrad Burns 0%
Dan Burton 0%
Steve Buyer 10%
Robert Byrd 78%
Chris Cannon 0%
Eric Cantor 0%
Dennis Cardoza 30%
Julia Carson 100%
Edward Case 100%
Mike Castle 50%
Ben Chandler III 100%
Chris Chocola 0%
Hillary Clinton 100%
Norm Coleman 0%
Kent Conrad 78%
Jon Corzine 89%
Jerry Costello 80%
Christopher Cox 0%
Larry Craig 0%
Robert Cramer 20%
Barbara Cubin 0%
Randall Cunningham 0%
Artur Davis 50%
James Davis 100%
Jo Ann Davis 0%
Lincoln Davis 44%
Thomas Davis III 33%
Bill Delahunt 100%
Thomas DeLay 0%
James DeMint 0%
Lincoln Diaz-Balart 10%
Norm Dicks 70%
Chris Dodd 100%
Elizabeth Dole 0%
Pete Domenici, Jr. 0%
John Doolittle 0%
Byron Dorgan 67%
David Dreier 0%
Chet Edwards 10%
Vern Ehlers 50%
Jo Ann Emerson 10%
Philip English 20%
John Ensign 0%
Bob Etheridge 60%
Lane Evans 100%
Terry Everett 0%
Tom Feeney 0%
Russ Feingold 78%
Michael Ferguson 100%
Bob Filner 100%
Mark Foley 0%
Harold Ford, Jr. 90%
Vito Fossella, Jr. 0%
Barney Frank 90%
William Frist 0%
Elton Gallegly 10%
Jim Gibbons 0%
Wayne Gilchrest 20%
Paul Gillmor 0%
Charlie Gonzalez 100%
Virgil Goode, Jr. 10%
Bart Gordon 78%
Mark Green 20%
Judd Gregg 22%
Gilbert Gutknecht 0%
Jane Harman 90%
Katherine Harris 0%
Melissa Hart 10%
Robert Hayes 0%
J.D. Hayworth, Jr. 10%
Joel Hefley 0%
Wally Herger, Jr. 0%
Stephanie Herseth Sandlin 50%
Maurice Hinchey 100%
David Lee Hobson 0%
Pete Hoekstra 0%
Thomas Holden 70%
Darlene Hooley 90%
John Nathan Hostettler 10%
Kenny Hulshof 10%
Duncan Hunter 0%
Kay Hutchison 0%
Henry Hyde 0%
Daniel Inouye 78%
Ernest Istook, Jr. 0%
Jesse Jackson, Jr. 100%
William Jefferson 100%
James Merrill Jeffords 100%
William Lewis Jenkins 0%
Nancy Johnson 50%
Tim Johnson 100%
Paul Kanjorski 70%
Ric Keller 0%
Sue Kelly 80%
Edward Kennedy, Sr. 100%
Mark Kennedy 0%
Patrick Kennedy 100%
Dale Kildee 100%
Carolyn Kilpatrick 90%
Joseph Knollenberg 0%
Herb Kohl 75%
James Kolbe 0%
Dennis Kucinich 100%
Jon Kyl 0%
Ray LaHood 0%
Tom Lantos 100%
Steve LaTourette 0%
Frank Lautenberg 89%
James Leach 90%
Jerry Lewis 0%
Ron Lewis 0%
Blanche Lincoln 11%
John Linder 0%
Trent Lott, Sr. 0%
Dick Lugar 0%
Don Manzullo 0%
Jim Marshall 30%
Robert Matsui 90%
Thaddeus McCotter 0%
James McCrery III 0%
John McHugh 0%
Michael McNulty 100%
Martin Meehan 90%
Kendrick Meek, Sr. 100%
Juanita Millender-McDonald 100%
Brad Miller 100%
Alan Mollohan 20%
Dennis Moore 90%
Jack Murtha 50%
Marilyn Musgrave 10%
Sue Myrick 0%
Ben Nelson 0%
Robert William Ney 0%
Anne Northup 0%
Charles Norwood, Jr. 0%
James Nussle 0%
Jim Oberstar 30%
Dave Obey 80%
John Olver 90%
Solomon Ortiz, Sr. 40%
Thomas William Osborne 0%
Major Owens 90%
Michael Oxley 0%
Ron Paul 40%
Donald Payne 100%
John Peterson 0%
Charles Pickering, Jr. 0%
Todd Platts 20%
Richard Pombo 0%
Earl Pomeroy 40%
Jon Porter, Sr. 10%
Deborah Pryce 20%
George Radanovich 0%
James Ramstad 90%
Ralph Regula 0%
Denny Rehberg 0%
Richard Renzi 10%
Silvestre Reyes 50%
Thomas Reynolds 0%
Mike Ross 10%
Steve Rothman 100%
Jim Ryun 0%
Martin Olav Sabo 90%
Rick Santorum 0%
Paul Sarbanes 89%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top