Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Bread for the World

1998 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Richard Bryan 67%
Ed Bryant 100%
Jim Bunning 100%
Conrad Burns 67%
Dan Burton 100%
Steve Buyer 67%
Robert Byrd 100%
Herbert Callahan 100%
Ben Campbell 33%
Thomas Campbell 100%
Chris Cannon 33%
Julia Carson 100%
Mike Castle 100%
John Chafee 33%
Helen Chenoweth-Hage 100%
William Clay, Sr. 100%
Eva Clayton 100%
Joseph Maxwell Cleland 100%
Robert Clement 100%
Michael Collins 33%
Larry Combest 100%
Gary Condit 100%
Kent Conrad 100%
Merrill Cook 100%
John Cooksey 100%
Jerry Costello 100%
Paul Coverdell 33%
Christopher Cox 67%
William Coyne 100%
Larry Craig 67%
Robert Cramer 100%
Philip Crane 33%
Barbara Cubin 67%
Randall Cunningham 67%
Patsy Ann Danner 100%
Thomas Daschle 100%
James Davis 100%
Thomas Davis III 100%
Bill Delahunt 100%
Thomas DeLay 33%
Peter Deutsch 100%
Lincoln Diaz-Balart 100%
Jay Dickey 100%
Norm Dicks 100%
Julian Dixon 100%
Chris Dodd 100%
Pete Domenici, Jr. 67%
Calvin Dooley 100%
John Doolittle 33%
Byron Dorgan 100%
David Dreier 67%
Jennifer Dunn 67%
Chet Edwards 100%
Vern Ehlers 100%
Bob Ehrlich, Jr. 50%
Jo Ann Emerson 67%
Philip English 67%
Bob Etheridge 100%
Lane Evans 100%
Terry Everett 100%
Thomas Ewing 100%
Russ Feingold 100%
Bob Filner 100%
Mark Foley 100%
Michael Patrick Forbes 100%
Harold Ford, Jr. 100%
Vito Fossella, Jr. 100%
Tillie Fowler 67%
Barney Frank 100%
Robert Franks 100%
William Frist 33%
Jonas Frost III 100%
Elton Gallegly 67%
John Ganske 100%
Sam Gejdenson 100%
George Gekas 67%
Richard Andrew Gephardt 100%
Jim Gibbons 67%
Wayne Gilchrest 100%
Paul Gillmor 100%
Benjamin Gilman 100%
Virgil Goode, Jr. 33%
William Goodling 67%
Bart Gordon 100%
Slade Gorton 67%
Porter Goss 33%
Daniel Graham 33%
William Phillip Gramm 0%
Rodney Grams 67%
James Greenwood 33%
Judd Gregg 0%
Gilbert Gutknecht 100%
Tony Hall 100%
James Hansen 100%
J. Dennis Hastert 67%
Robert Hayes 100%
J.D. Hayworth, Jr. 100%
Joel Hefley 33%
Jesse Helms 0%
Wally Herger, Jr. 33%
Rick Hill 100%
Van Hilleary 50%
Earl Hilliard, Jr. 100%
Maurice Hinchey 100%
David Lee Hobson 67%
Pete Hoekstra 67%
Thomas Holden 100%
Ernest Hollings 33%
Darlene Hooley 100%
Stephen Horn 100%
John Nathan Hostettler 33%
Amory Houghton, Jr. 67%
Kenny Hulshof 67%
Duncan Hunter 33%
Asa Hutchinson 100%
Y. Tim Hutchinson 33%
Kay Hutchison 67%
Henry Hyde 100%
Daniel Inouye 100%
Ernest Istook, Jr. 33%
Jesse Jackson, Jr. 100%
William Jefferson 100%
James Merrill Jeffords 67%
William Lewis Jenkins 67%
Christopher John 100%
Nancy Johnson 100%
Paul Kanjorski 100%
Sue Kelly 100%
Edward Kennedy, Sr. 100%
Patrick Kennedy 100%
Bob Kerrey 100%
Dale Kildee 100%
Carolyn Kilpatrick 100%
Gerald Kleczka 100%
Ronald Klink 100%
Joseph Knollenberg 67%
Herb Kohl 67%
James Kolbe 67%
Dennis Kucinich 100%
Jon Kyl 0%
John LaFalce 100%
Ray LaHood 100%
Nicholas Lampson 100%
Tom Lantos 100%
Stephen Largent 33%
Steve LaTourette 100%
Frank Lautenberg 67%
Rick Lazio 100%
James Leach 100%
Jerry Lewis 100%
Ron Lewis 67%
Joe Lieberman 67%
John Linder 67%
William Lipinski 100%
Trent Lott, Sr. 33%
Dick Lugar 67%
William Luther 100%
Connie Mack 33%
James Maloney 100%
Don Manzullo 33%
Matthew Martinez 100%
Frank Mascara 100%
Robert Matsui 100%
Karen McCarthy 100%
Bill McCollum 67%
James McCrery III 67%
John McHugh 100%
Scott McInnis 67%
David McIntosh 67%
Cynthia Ann McKinney 100%
Michael McNulty 100%
Martin Meehan 100%
Carrie Meek 100%
Jack Metcalf 67%
Juanita Millender-McDonald 100%
Dan Miller 33%
David Minge 100%
Patsy Takemoto Mink 100%
John Moakley 100%
Alan Mollohan 100%
Constance Morella 100%
Patrick Moynihan 100%
Frank Murkowski 33%
Jack Murtha 100%
Sue Myrick 50%
George Nethercutt, Jr. 100%
Robert William Ney 100%
Don Nickles 33%
Anne Northup 100%
Charles Norwood, Jr. 50%
James Nussle 100%
Jim Oberstar 100%
Dave Obey 100%
John Olver 100%
Solomon Ortiz, Sr. 100%
Major Owens 100%
Michael Oxley 100%
Ronald Packard 67%
Ron Paul 0%
Donald Payne 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top