Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Bread for the World

2001-2002 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Gary Ackerman 100%
Daniel Akaka, Sr. 100%
Todd Akin 33%
Wayne Allard 100%
George Allen 100%
Thomas Allen 100%
Rob Andrews 100%
Joe Baca, Sr. 100%
Brian Baird 100%
Richard Hugh Baker 33%
Cass Ballenger 33%
Roscoe Bartlett 33%
Charlie Bass 33%
Max Baucus 100%
Evan Bayh 100%
Bob Bennett 100%
Douglas Bereuter 33%
Shelley Berkley 100%
Howard Berman 100%
Marion Berry 67%
Judy Biggert 67%
Michael Bilirakis 33%
Jeff Bingaman 100%
Sherwood Boehlert 67%
Kit Bond 100%
Henry Bonilla 0%
Mary Bono Mack 67%
Leonard Boswell 100%
Rick Boucher 100%
Allen Boyd, Jr. 67%
John Breaux 100%
Henry Brown, Jr. 33%
Jim Bunning 100%
Conrad Burns 100%
Dan Burton 33%
Steve Buyer 50%
Robert Byrd 100%
Ben Campbell 100%
Chris Cannon 33%
Eric Cantor 33%
Brad Carson 100%
Julia Carson 100%
Mike Castle 67%
Hillary Clinton 100%
Michael Collins 0%
Larry Combest 50%
Kent Conrad 100%
Jon Corzine 100%
Jerry Costello 100%
Christopher Cox 33%
Larry Craig 100%
Robert Cramer 33%
Philip Crane 50%
Barbara Cubin 0%
Randall Cunningham 33%
Thomas Daschle 100%
James Davis 100%
Jo Ann Davis 33%
Thomas Davis III 67%
Bill Delahunt 100%
Thomas DeLay 33%
James DeMint 33%
Peter Deutsch 100%
Lincoln Diaz-Balart 67%
Norm Dicks 100%
Chris Dodd 100%
Calvin Dooley 100%
John Doolittle 33%
Byron Dorgan 100%
David Dreier 67%
Jennifer Dunn 33%
John Edwards 100%
Chet Edwards 67%
Vern Ehlers 67%
Jo Ann Emerson 50%
Philip English 33%
John Ensign 100%
Bob Etheridge 100%
Lane Evans 100%
Terry Everett 33%
Russ Feingold 100%
Michael Ferguson 67%
Bob Filner 100%
Peter Fitzgerald 100%
Ernest Fletcher 33%
Mark Foley 50%
Harold Ford, Jr. 100%
Vito Fossella, Jr. 33%
Barney Frank 100%
William Frist 100%
Jonas Frost III 100%
Elton Gallegly 33%
Richard Andrew Gephardt 100%
Jim Gibbons 33%
Wayne Gilchrest 50%
Paul Gillmor 67%
Charlie Gonzalez 100%
Virgil Goode, Jr. 0%
Bart Gordon 100%
Porter Goss 33%
Daniel Graham 100%
Mark Green 33%
James Greenwood 33%
Judd Gregg 100%
Gilbert Gutknecht 33%
Jane Harman 100%
Melissa Hart 33%
J. Dennis Hastert 0%
Robert Hayes 33%
J.D. Hayworth, Jr. 33%
Joel Hefley 33%
Wally Herger, Jr. 0%
Baron Hill 100%
Maurice Hinchey 100%
David Lee Hobson 33%
PA Commissioner At-Large Joseph Hoeffel 100%
Pete Hoekstra 33%
Thomas Holden 67%
Ernest Hollings 100%
Darlene Hooley 100%
John Nathan Hostettler 50%
Amory Houghton, Jr. 50%
Kenny Hulshof 67%
Duncan Hunter 33%
Kay Hutchison 100%
Henry Hyde 33%
Daniel Inouye 100%
Ernest Istook, Jr. 33%
Jesse Jackson, Jr. 100%
William Jefferson 100%
James Merrill Jeffords 100%
William Lewis Jenkins 33%
Christopher John 100%
Nancy Johnson 67%
Tim Johnson 67%
Paul Kanjorski 100%
Ric Keller 33%
Sue Kelly 67%
Edward Kennedy, Sr. 100%
Mark Kennedy 33%
Patrick Kennedy 100%
Dale Kildee 100%
Carolyn Kilpatrick 100%
Gerald Kleczka 100%
Joseph Knollenberg 33%
Herb Kohl 100%
James Kolbe 67%
Dennis Kucinich 100%
Jon Kyl 100%
Ray LaHood 33%
Nicholas Lampson 100%
Tom Lantos 100%
Steve LaTourette 0%
James Leach 67%
Jerry Lewis 67%
Ron Lewis 33%
Joe Lieberman 100%
Blanche Lincoln 100%
John Linder 33%
William Lipinski 100%
Trent Lott, Sr. 100%
Ken Lucas 33%
Dick Lugar 100%
Don Manzullo 33%
Robert Matsui 100%
Karen McCarthy 100%
James McCrery III 33%
John McHugh 67%
Scott McInnis 33%
Michael McNulty 100%
Martin Meehan 100%
Juanita Millender-McDonald 100%
Zell Bryan Miller 100%
Alan Mollohan 100%
Dennis Moore 100%
Jack Murtha 100%
Sue Myrick 33%
Ben Nelson 100%
George Nethercutt, Jr. 33%
Robert William Ney 0%
Don Nickles 100%
Anne Northup 33%
Charles Norwood, Jr. 33%
James Nussle 33%
Jim Oberstar 100%
Dave Obey 100%
John Olver 100%
Solomon Ortiz, Sr. 100%
Thomas William Osborne 67%
Doug Ose 67%
Major Owens 100%
Michael Oxley 33%
Ron Paul 33%
Donald Payne 100%
John Peterson 33%
Charles Pickering, Jr. 33%
Todd Platts 33%
Richard Pombo 50%
Earl Pomeroy 67%
Deborah Pryce 50%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top