or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Louisiana ACLU

1999 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
LA U.S. House 1 Steve Scalise Republican 0%
LA State Senate 3 Jean-Paul Morrell Democratic 44%
LA State Senate 4 Edwin Murray Democratic 38%
LA State Senate 8 John Alario, Jr. Republican 0%
LA State Senate 10 Daniel Martiny Republican 10%
LA State Senate 12 Ben Nevers, Sr. Democratic 0%
LA State Senate 25 Dan Morrish Republican 10%
LA State Senate 27 Ronnie Johns Republican 0%
LA State Senate 30 John Smith Republican 0%
LA State Senate 33 Michael Walsworth Republican 0%
LA State Senate 34 Francis Thompson Democratic 0%
LA State Senate 39 Gregory Williams Tarver, Sr. Democratic 9%
LA Mayor At-Large Mitch Landrieu Democratic 30%
LA Public Service Commissioner Foster Campbell, Jr. Democratic 9%
LA Lieutenant Governor Jay Dardenne, Jr. Republican 9%
LA Insurance Commissioner James Donelon Republican 0%
LA Secretary of State Tom Schedler, Jr. Republican 0%
Rodney Alexander 0%
Glenn Ansardi 10%
Diana Bajoie 25%
Robert Barham 0%
Clara Baudoin 0%
Ernest Baylor, Jr. 11%
Lambert Boissiere, Jr. 20%
Shirley Bowler 10%
Michael Franklin Branch 0%
Beverly Gourdon Bruce 0%
Emile Bruneau 0%
James Cain 9%
Robert Carter 0%
Thomas Casanova III 0%
Joel Chaisson II 10%
Jacquelyn Brechtel Clarkson 11%
James Joseph Cox 11%
Carl Crane 0%
Donald Cravins, Sr. 9%
Israel Curtis 44%
N. J. Damico 0%
William Daniel IV 0%
Lynn Blackquell Dean 25%
John Dirk Deville 0%
Charles DeWitt, Jr. 0%
John Diez 0%
Hunt Downer, Jr. 0%
Reggie Dupre, Jr. 0%
Sydnie Mae Durand 0%
B.G. Dyess 13%
Noble Ellington 8%
Randy Ewing 10%
Robert Faucheux, Jr. 0%
Cleo Fields 17%
Wilson Fields 30%
Daniel Thomas Flavin 0%
Mickey Frith 0%
Gregory Lee Fruge 10%
Butch Gautreaux 10%
Cedric Bradford Glover 20%
Kyle Mark Green 33%
Elcie Guillory 30%
John Joseph Hainkel, Jr. 0%
Alexander Heaton 30%
Troy Hebert 0%
Francis Heitmeier 8%
Herman Ray Hill 10%
Donald Hines 8%
Melvin Lee Holden 33%
Ken Hollis 8%
Roy Hopkins 0%
Charles Irvin Hudson 0%
Willie Hunter, Jr. 44%
Kay Iles 10%
Paulette Riley Irons 33%
Louis Jenkins 0%
Raymond Jetson 33%
Jon Johnson 9%
Charles Jones 13%
Donald Kennard 0%
Lelon Kenney 0%
Louis Lambert, Jr. 11%
Charles Lancaster, Jr. 10%
Jerry Luke LeBlanc 0%
Arthur Lentini 0%
Max Malone 0%
Robert Marionneaux, Jr. 10%
Jay Bowen McCallum 0%
Charles McDonald 0%
F. Charles McMains, Jr. 0%
Michael Michot 10%
Billy Montgomery 0%
Kenneth Odinet, Sr. 10%
Anthony Richard Perkins 0%
Wilfred Pierre 20%
Gillis Pinac 10%
Henry Powell 0%
Renee Gill Pratt 40%
Roy Quezaire, Jr. 30%
Charles Riddle III 20%
Michael Robichaux 9%
Craig Romero 18%
Errol Romero 0%
Joe Salter 11%
Matthew Schneider III 0%
Melinda Schwegmann 20%
B.L. Shaw 0%
John Siracusa 0%
Jack Smith 0%
Kenneth Smith 8%
Jennifer Sneed 13%
Victor Stelly 0%
Gerald Theunissen 8%
Jerry Thomas 8%
Tom Thornhill 0%
Joseph Toomy 0%
John Travis 0%
Warren Triche, Jr. 0%
J. Chris Ullo 0%
Wayne Waddell 10%
Thomas Warner 10%
Sharon Weston 30%
Pinkie Carolyn Wilkerson 30%
Cynthia Willard-Lewis 30%
Stephen Windhorst 0%
Diane Winston 10%
Ernest Wooton 10%
Thomas Wright 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top