| State | Office | District | Name | Party | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LA | State Senate | 3 | Jean-Paul Morrell | Democratic | 88% |
| LA | State Senate | 5 | Karen Peterson | Democratic | 86% |
| Cedric Bradford Glover | 83% | ||||
| Elcie Guillory | 75% | ||||
| Willie Hunter, Jr. | 75% | ||||
| Wilfred Pierre | 75% | ||||
| Ernest Baylor, Jr. | 71% | ||||
| Roy Quezaire, Jr. | 71% | ||||
| Diana Bajoie | 67% | ||||
| LA | State Senate | 28 | Eric LaFleur | Democratic | 67% |
| Carla Dartez | 63% | ||||
| LA | State Senate | 29 | Richard Gallot, Jr. | Democratic | 63% |
| Alexander Heaton | 63% | ||||
| Avon Honey | 63% | ||||
| Michael Jackson | 63% | ||||
| William Daniel IV | 57% | ||||
| Cleo Fields | 57% | ||||
| Lydia Jackson | 57% | ||||
| LA | State Senate | 8 | John Alario, Jr. | Republican | 50% |
| LA | State House | 102 | Jeffery Arnold | Democratic | 50% |
| Shirley Bowler | 50% | ||||
| Charles DeWitt, Jr. | 50% | ||||
| Charles Jones | 50% | ||||
| Kenneth Odinet, Sr. | 50% | ||||
| LA | U.S. House | 2 | Cedric Richmond | Democratic | 50% |
| Errol Romero | 50% | ||||
| Monica Walker | 50% | ||||
| Joel Chaisson II | 44% | ||||
| Donald Cravins, Sr. | 44% | ||||
| Israel Curtis | 43% | ||||
| Herman Ray Hill | 43% | ||||
| Donald Hines | 43% | ||||
| Billy Montgomery | 43% | ||||
| Thomas Townsend | 43% | ||||
| Thomas Wright | 43% | ||||
| Ernest Wooton | 40% | ||||
| N. J. Damico | 38% | ||||
| Rick Farrar | 38% | ||||
| Butch Gautreaux | 38% | ||||
| Troy Hebert | 38% | ||||
| Jack Smith | 38% | ||||
| LA | State Senate | 34 | Francis Thompson | Democratic | 38% |
| Kay Katz | 37% | ||||
| Gillis Pinac | 37% | ||||
| Craig Romero | 36% | ||||
| J. Chris Ullo | 36% | ||||
| Jean Doerge | 33% | ||||
| Sydnie Mae Durand | 33% | ||||
| LA | State Senate | 36 | Robert Adley | Republican | 30% |
| LA | Lieutenant Governor | Jay Dardenne, Jr. | Republican | 30% | |
| Heulette Fontenot | 30% | ||||
| Ken Hollis | 30% | ||||
| Robert Carter | 29% | ||||
| Roy Hopkins | 29% | ||||
| LA | State Senate | 10 | Daniel Martiny | Republican | 29% |
| Charles McDonald | 29% | ||||
| LA | State Senate | 25 | Dan Morrish | Republican | 29% |
| Robert Barham | 27% | ||||
| Arthur Lentini | 27% | ||||
| Michael Michot | 27% | ||||
| Willie Mount | 27% | ||||
| Gerald Theunissen | 27% | ||||
| Ernest Alexander | 25% | ||||
| Damon Baldone | 25% | ||||
| Hollis Downs | 25% | ||||
| Robert Faucheux, Jr. | 25% | ||||
| Lelon Kenney | 25% | ||||
| Robert Marionneaux, Jr. | 25% | ||||
| LA | State Senate | 19 | Gary Smith, Jr. | Democratic | 25% |
| Jane Smith | 25% | ||||
| Wayne Waddell | 25% | ||||
| Joe McPherson | 22% | ||||
| LA | Secretary of State | Tom Schedler, Jr. | Republican | 22% | |
| James Cain | 18% | ||||
| Francis Heitmeier | 18% | ||||
| Max Malone | 18% | ||||
| Kenneth Smith | 18% | ||||
| Clara Baudoin | 17% | ||||
| Glenn Ansardi | 14% | ||||
| Donald Cazayoux, Jr. | 14% | ||||
| Carl Crane | 14% | ||||
| LA | State Senate | 1 | A. Crowe, Jr. | Republican | 14% |
| LA | State Senate | 13 | Dale Erdey | Republican | 14% |
| Thomas McVea | 14% | ||||
| Joseph Toomy | 14% | ||||
| Gary Beard | 13% | ||||
| Mickey Frith | 13% | ||||
| LA | State Senate | 27 | Ronnie Johns | Republican | 13% |
| Loulan Pitre, Jr. | 13% | ||||
| Joe Salter | 13% | ||||
| LA | U.S. House | 1 | Steve Scalise | Republican | 13% |
| Jim Tucker | 13% | ||||
| Reggie Dupre, Jr. | 11% | ||||
| Noble Ellington | 11% | ||||
| Beverly Gourdon Bruce | 0% | ||||
| Emile Bruneau | 0% | ||||
| LA | State House | 13 | James Fannin | Democratic | 0% |
| Nita Hutter | 0% | ||||
| Donald Kennard | 0% | ||||
| Charles Lancaster, Jr. | 0% | ||||
| Henry Powell | 0% | ||||
| Matthew Schneider III | 0% | ||||
| LA | State Senate | 30 | John Smith | Republican | 0% |
| LA | Commissioner of Agriculture and Forestry | Michael Strain | Republican | 0% | |
| Warren Triche, Jr. | 0% | ||||
| LA | State Senate | 33 | Michael Walsworth | Republican | 0% |
| Diane Winston | 0% |
Issues:
Civil Liberties and Civil Rights
How to Interpret these Evaluations
Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.
Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.
