Rating Group: Louisiana ACLU

2001 Positions

State Office Name Party Rating
LA U.S. House-1 Steve Scalise R 11%
LA U.S. House-2 Cedric Richmond D 78%
LA Lieutenant Governor Jay Dardenne, Jr. R 50%
LA State Senate-1 A. Crowe, Jr. R 11%
LA State Senate-3 Jean-Paul Morrell D 75%
LA State Senate-4 Edwin Murray D 78%
LA State Senate-5 Karen Peterson D 75%
LA State Senate-8 John Alario, Jr. R 44%
LA State Senate-10 Daniel Martiny R 56%
LA State Senate-12 Ben Nevers, Sr. D 13%
LA State Senate-13 Dale Erdey R 33%
LA State Senate-14 Yvonne Dorsey-Colomb D 88%
LA State Senate-15 Sharon Broome D 22%
LA State Senate-19 Gary Smith, Jr. D 33%
LA State Senate-25 Dan Morrish R 50%
LA State Senate-27 Ronnie Johns R 33%
LA State Senate-28 Eric LaFleur D 88%
LA State Senate-29 Richard Gallot, Jr. D 56%
LA State Senate-30 John Smith R 22%
LA State Senate-33 Michael Walsworth R 22%
LA State Senate-34 Francis Thompson D 44%
LA State Senate-39 Gregory Williams Tarver, Sr. D 43%
LA Secretary of State Tom Schedler, Jr. R 40%
LA Commissioner of Agriculture and Forestry Michael Strain R 38%
LA Mayor-At-Large Mitch Landrieu D 50%
LA Public Service Commissioner Foster Campbell, Jr. D 71%
Ernest Alexander 44%
Rodney Alexander 43%
Glenn Ansardi 56%
Diana Bajoie 100%
Robert Barham 25%
Clara Baudoin 0%
Ernest Baylor, Jr. 86%
Ronald Bean 57%
Lambert Boissiere, Jr. 75%
Shirley Bowler 38%
Beverly Gourdon Bruce 33%
Emile Bruneau 44%
James Cain 25%
Robert Carter 0%
Donald Cazayoux, Jr. 67%
Joel Chaisson II 86%
Jacquelyn Brechtel Clarkson 57%
Carl Crane 33%
Donald Cravins, Sr. 75%
Israel Curtis 71%
N. J. Damico 56%
William Daniel IV 63%
Carla Dartez 38%
Lynn Blackquell Dean 88%
Emma Devillier 57%
Charles DeWitt, Jr. 75%
John Diez 56%
Jean Doerge 44%
Hunt Downer, Jr. 13%
Reggie Dupre, Jr. 25%
Sydnie Mae Durand 33%
Noble Ellington 38%
Rick Farrar 38%
Robert Faucheux, Jr. 44%
Cleo Fields 100%
Wilson Fields 100%
Daniel Thomas Flavin 50%
Heulette Fontenot 0%
Mickey Frith 44%
Gregory Lee Fruge 44%
Mike Futrell 22%
Butch Gautreaux 57%
Cedric Bradford Glover 50%
Kyle Mark Green 89%
Elcie Guillory 63%
John Joseph Hainkel, Jr. 33%
Alexander Heaton 71%
Troy Hebert 14%
Francis Heitmeier 60%
Herman Ray Hill 33%
Donald Hines 67%
Melvin Lee Holden 78%
Ken Hollis 60%
Roy Hopkins 25%
Fred Hoyt 13%
Charles Irvin Hudson 43%
Willie Hunter, Jr. 67%
Nita Hutter 44%
Kay Iles 44%
Paulette Riley Irons 88%
Lydia Jackson 100%
Michael Jackson 57%
Jon Johnson 71%
Bill Jones 57%
Charles Jones 75%
Kay Katz 22%
Donald Kennard 25%
Lelon Kenney 25%
Louis Lambert, Jr. 0%
Charles Lancaster, Jr. 25%
Jerry Luke LeBlanc 33%
Arthur Lentini 0%
Leonard Lucas, Jr. 50%
Max Malone 0%
Robert Marionneaux, Jr. 100%
Jay Bowen McCallum 11%
Charles McDonald 29%
Joe McPherson 40%
Thomas McVea 22%
Michael Michot 0%
Billy Montgomery 67%
Willie Mount 38%
Kenneth Odinet, Sr. 22%
Anthony Richard Perkins 22%
Wilfred Pierre 78%
Gillis Pinac 33%
Loulan Pitre, Jr. 33%
Henry Powell 22%
Renee Gill Pratt 75%
Roy Quezaire, Jr. 63%
Charles Riddle III 33%
Craig Romero 14%
Errol Romero 29%
Joe Salter 33%
Matthew Schneider III 14%
Melinda Schwegmann 67%
B.L. Shaw 22%
Jack Smith 38%
Jane Smith 22%
Kenneth Smith 38%
Jennifer Sneed 33%
Victor Stelly 43%
Patrick Swilling 83%
Gerald Theunissen 0%
Jerry Thomas 25%
Joseph Toomy 44%
Thomas Townsend 57%
Warren Triche, Jr. 20%
Jim Tucker 0%
J. Chris Ullo 38%
Wayne Waddell 22%
Diane Winston 50%
Ernest Wooton 50%
Thomas Wright 50%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.