Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: American Land Rights Association (formerly League of Private Property Voters)

2001 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Jeff Bingaman 14%
Rod Blagojevich 10%
Sherwood Boehlert 10%
Kit Bond 100%
Henry Bonilla 100%
David Edward Bonior 0%
Mary Bono Mack 70%
Robert Borski, Jr. 0%
Leonard Boswell 20%
Rick Boucher 10%
Allen Boyd, Jr. 60%
John Breaux 86%
Henry Brown, Jr. 90%
Ed Bryant 100%
Jim Bunning 100%
Conrad Burns 100%
Dan Burton 90%
Steve Buyer 100%
Robert Byrd 29%
Herbert Callahan 50%
Dave Camp 60%
Ben Campbell 100%
Chris Cannon 70%
Eric Cantor 100%
Jean Carnahan 43%
Brad Carson 40%
Julia Carson 0%
Mike Castle 30%
Lincoln Chafee 43%
Saxby Chambliss 70%
Eva Clayton 10%
Joseph Maxwell Cleland 29%
Robert Clement 20%
Hillary Clinton 0%
Howard Coble 70%
Michael Collins 90%
Larry Combest 100%
Gary Condit 50%
Kent Conrad 29%
John Cooksey 70%
Jon Corzine 0%
Jerry Costello 20%
Christopher Cox 80%
William Coyne 0%
Larry Craig 100%
Robert Cramer 60%
Philip Crane 70%
Barbara Cubin 80%
Randall Cunningham 100%
Thomas Daschle 14%
James Davis 30%
Jo Ann Davis 80%
Thomas Davis III 40%
Bill Delahunt 0%
Thomas DeLay 100%
James DeMint 100%
Peter Deutsch 0%
Lincoln Diaz-Balart 60%
Norm Dicks 30%
John Dingell 0%
Chris Dodd 14%
Pete Domenici, Jr. 71%
Calvin Dooley 30%
John Doolittle 100%
Byron Dorgan 0%
David Dreier 100%
Jennifer Dunn 90%
John Edwards 14%
Chet Edwards 60%
Vern Ehlers 20%
Bob Ehrlich, Jr. 50%
Philip English 50%
John Ensign 100%
Bob Etheridge 20%
Lane Evans 10%
Terry Everett 50%
Russ Feingold 29%
Michael Ferguson 50%
Bob Filner 0%
Peter Fitzgerald 57%
Ernest Fletcher 60%
Mark Foley 50%
Harold Ford, Jr. 20%
Vito Fossella, Jr. 70%
Barney Frank 0%
William Frist 86%
Jonas Frost III 10%
Elton Gallegly 70%
John Ganske 60%
George Gekas 70%
Richard Andrew Gephardt 30%
Jim Gibbons 90%
Wayne Gilchrest 40%
Paul Gillmor 50%
Benjamin Gilman 20%
Charlie Gonzalez 10%
Virgil Goode, Jr. 100%
Bart Gordon 20%
Porter Goss 50%
Daniel Graham 29%
William Phillip Gramm 100%
Mark Green 50%
James Greenwood 20%
Judd Gregg 86%
Felix Grucci, Jr. 50%
Gilbert Gutknecht 60%
Charles Hagel 100%
Ralph Hall 90%
Tony Hall 40%
James Hansen 70%
Tom Harkin 0%
Jane Harman 10%
Melissa Hart 60%
Doc Hastings 100%
Robert Hayes 70%
J.D. Hayworth, Jr. 100%
Joel Hefley 70%
Jesse Helms 86%
Wally Herger, Jr. 100%
Baron Hill 10%
Van Hilleary 90%
Earl Hilliard, Jr. 50%
Maurice Hinchey 30%
David Lee Hobson 100%
Joseph Hoeffel 0%
Pete Hoekstra 80%
Thomas Holden 10%
Ernest Hollings 29%
Rush Holt, Jr. 10%
Darlene Hooley 10%
Stephen Horn 40%
John Nathan Hostettler 100%
Amory Houghton, Jr. 10%
Kenny Hulshof 100%
Duncan Hunter 100%
Y. Tim Hutchinson 100%
Kay Hutchison 100%
Henry Hyde 80%
Daniel Inouye 14%
Ernest Istook, Jr. 100%
Jesse Jackson, Jr. 30%
William Jefferson 30%
James Merrill Jeffords 43%
William Lewis Jenkins 100%
Christopher John 60%
Nancy Johnson 20%
Tim Johnson 30%
Timothy Johnson 29%
Paul Kanjorski 40%
Ric Keller 100%
Sue Kelly 20%
Edward Kennedy, Sr. 0%
Mark Kennedy 70%
Patrick Kennedy 0%
Brian Kerns 100%
Dale Kildee 0%
Carolyn Kilpatrick 30%
Jack Kingston 100%
Gerald Kleczka 0%
Joseph Knollenberg 100%
Herb Kohl 14%
James Kolbe 90%
Dennis Kucinich 0%
Jon Kyl 100%
John LaFalce 30%
Ray LaHood 40%
Nicholas Lampson 30%
Mary Landrieu 71%
Tom Lantos 0%
Tom Latham 80%
Steve LaTourette 80%
James Leach 20%
Carl Levin 14%
Jerry Lewis 100%
Ron Lewis 100%
Joe Lieberman 0%
Blanche Lincoln 43%
John Linder 100%
William Lipinski 20%
Trent Lott, Sr. 100%
Ken Lucas 40%
Dick Lugar 86%
William Luther 0%
James Maloney 10%
Don Manzullo 100%
Frank Mascara 20%
Jim Matheson 20%
Robert Matsui 0%
Carolyn McCarthy 10%
Karen McCarthy 0%
James McCrery III 70%
John McHugh 70%
Mike McIntyre 20%
Buck McKeon 100%
Cynthia Ann McKinney 10%
Michael McNulty 0%
Martin Meehan 0%
Carrie Meek 10%
Juanita Millender-McDonald 30%
Dan Miller 90%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top