| State | Office | District | Name | Party | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MT | U.S. Senate | Jr | Jon Tester | Democratic | 70% |
| MT | State House | 3 | Jerry O'Neil | Republican | 0% |
| MT | State House | 96 | Carolyn Squires | Democratic | 100% |
| MT | State Senate | 2 | Dee Brown | Republican | 9% |
| MT | State Senate | 5 | Verdell Jackson | Republican | 0% |
| MT | State Senate | 9 | Rick Ripley | Republican | 0% |
| MT | State Senate | 15 | Jim Peterson | Republican | 0% |
| MT | State Senate | 16 | Jonathan Windy Boy | Democratic | 100% |
| MT | State Senate | 23 | Alan Olson | Republican | 0% |
| MT | State Senate | 32 | Larry Jent | Democratic | 100% |
| MT | State Senate | 34 | Scott Sales | Republican | 33% |
| MT | State Senate | 36 | Debby Barrett | Republican | 0% |
| MT | State Senate | 38 | Jim Keane | Democratic | 83% |
| MT | State Senate | 41 | Christine Kaufmann | Democratic | 100% |
| MT | State Senate | 42 | Dave Lewis | Republican | 17% |
| MT | State Senate | 48 | Tom Facey | Democratic | 100% |
| MT | State Senate | 49 | David Wanzenried | Democratic | 100% |
| MT | Justice of the Supreme Court | Seat 2 | Mike Wheat | Non-partisan | 100% |
| MT | Auditor | Monica Lindeen | Democratic | 100% | |
| MT | Public Service Commissioner | 4 | Bob Lake | Republican | 8% |
| Joan Andersen | 17% | ||||
| Keith Bales | 10% | ||||
| Joe Balyeat | 17% | ||||
| Gregory Barkus | 10% | ||||
| Arlene Becker | 100% | ||||
| Bob Bergren | 83% | ||||
| Norma Bixby | 100% | ||||
| Jerry Black | 10% | ||||
| Gary Branae | 100% | ||||
| Roy Brown | 0% | ||||
| John Brueggeman | 0% | ||||
| Edward Butcher | 0% | ||||
| Rosalie Buzzas | 92% | ||||
| Terrence Callahan | 100% | ||||
| Paul Clark | 100% | ||||
| John Cobb | 70% | ||||
| Vicki Cocchiarella | 70% | ||||
| Jill Cohenour | 100% | ||||
| Mike Cooney | 100% | ||||
| Brent Cromley | 70% | ||||
| Aubyn Curtiss | 0% | ||||
| Sue Dickenson | 100% | ||||
| Tim Dowell | 100% | ||||
| Jon Ellingson | 100% | ||||
| Jim Elliott | 89% | ||||
| John Esp | 0% | ||||
| George Loren Everett | 0% | ||||
| Eve Franklin | 83% | ||||
| David Gallik | 92% | ||||
| Steven Gallus | 83% | ||||
| Kathleen Galvin-Halcro | 92% | ||||
| Kelly Gebhardt | 0% | ||||
| Kim Gillan | 91% | ||||
| George Golie | 92% | ||||
| Duane Grimes | 20% | ||||
| Gail Gutsche | 100% | ||||
| Kenneth Hansen | 80% | ||||
| Dan Harrington | 88% | ||||
| Christopher Kirk Harris | 92% | ||||
| Ray Hawk | 8% | ||||
| Hal Jacobson | 92% | ||||
| Joey Jayne | 92% | ||||
| Carol Juneau | 92% | ||||
| Bob Keenan | 0% | ||||
| Sam Kitzenberg | 50% | ||||
| Richard Laible | 0% | ||||
| Carol Lambert | 0% | ||||
| Michael Lange | 17% | ||||
| Jesse Laslovich | 83% | ||||
| Ralph Lenhart | 75% | ||||
| Rick Maedje | 0% | ||||
| Bruce Malcolm | 17% | ||||
| Jeff Mangan | 50% | ||||
| Gary Matthews | 33% | ||||
| Daniel McGee | 0% | ||||
| Joe McKenney | 8% | ||||
| Scott Mendenhall | 17% | ||||
| Penny Armstrong Morgan | 0% | ||||
| John Musgrove | 83% | ||||
| Mark Noennig | 45% | ||||
| Bernie Olson | 0% | ||||
| John Parker | 100% | ||||
| Gerald Pease | 78% | ||||
| Gary Perry | 20% | ||||
| Holly Raser | 100% | ||||
| Diane Rice | 0% | ||||
| Donald Roberts | 9% | ||||
| John Ross | 8% | ||||
| Glenn Roush | 56% | ||||
| Don Ryan | 90% | ||||
| Trudi Schmidt | 100% | ||||
| Jim Shockley | 42% | ||||
| John Sinrud | 8% | ||||
| Veronica Small-Eastman | 83% | ||||
| Frank Smith | 66% | ||||
| Corey Stapleton | 10% | ||||
| Donald Steinbeisser | 8% | ||||
| Ronald Stoker | 8% | ||||
| Robert Story, Jr. | 10% | ||||
| Bill Tash | 0% | ||||
| Kenneth Toole, Jr. | 100% | ||||
| Joseph Tropila | 100% | ||||
| Pat Wagman | 8% | ||||
| Karl Waitschies | 0% | ||||
| Bill Wilson | 92% | ||||
| John Witt | 8% |
Issues:
Environment
How to Interpret these Evaluations
Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.
Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.
