Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP)

1995-1996 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Edmond Spencer Abraham 20%
Gary Ackerman 73%
Daniel Akaka, Sr. 89%
Rob Andrews 64%
Bill Archer 18%
Richard Armey 18%
John Ashcroft 22%
Henry Scott Baesler 55%
Richard Hugh Baker 18%
William Baker 20%
Cass Ballenger 18%
James Barcia 55%
Bob Barr, Jr. 18%
Bill Barrett 18%
Roscoe Bartlett 18%
Charlie Bass 18%
Herbert Bateman 20%
Max Baucus 50%
Anthony Beilenson 70%
Bob Bennett 20%
Kenneth Bentsen, Jr. 55%
Douglas Bereuter 27%
Howard Berman 80%
Tom Bevill 60%
Brian Bilbray 18%
Michael Bilirakis 18%
Jeff Bingaman 70%
Thomas Bliley, Jr. 10%
Peter Blute 40%
Sherwood Boehlert 36%
Kit Bond 30%
Henry Bonilla 18%
David Edward Bonior 91%
Sonny Bono 18%
Robert Borski, Jr. 80%
Rick Boucher 60%
Bill Bradley 80%
John Breaux 60%
Bill Brewster 30%
George Brown, Jr. 91%
Hank Brown 10%
Richard Bryan 60%
Ed Bryant 18%
John Bryant 80%
Dale Bumpers 80%
Jim Bunning 18%
Conrad Burns 20%
Dan Burton 18%
Steve Buyer 18%
Robert Byrd 60%
Herbert Callahan 18%
Ben Campbell 33%
Thomas Campbell 67%
FL Justice of the Supreme Court Charles Canady 18%
Mike Castle 27%
John Chafee 30%
Helen Chenoweth-Hage 27%
Jon Lynn Christensen 18%
William Clay, Sr. 100%
Eva Clayton 100%
Robert Clement 55%
William Clinger 10%
William Cohen 70%
Ronald Coleman 60%
Barbara-Rose Collins 90%
Cardiss Collins 90%
Michael Collins 18%
Larry Combest 18%
Gary Condit 27%
Kent Conrad 70%
Jerry Costello 64%
Paul Coverdell 20%
Christopher Cox 18%
William Coyne 100%
Larry Craig 20%
Robert Cramer 27%
Philip Crane 18%
Barbara Cubin 18%
Randall Cunningham 18%
Alfonse D'Amato 30%
Patsy Ann Danner 36%
Thomas Daschle 70%
Thomas Davis III 18%
E. Kika de la Garza 60%
Thomas DeLay 18%
Ronald Dellums 91%
Peter Deutsch 64%
Lincoln Diaz-Balart 20%
Jay Dickey 18%
Norm Dicks 64%
Julian Dixon 91%
Chris Dodd 60%
Robert Dole 10%
Pete Domenici, Jr. 30%
Calvin Dooley 55%
John Doolittle 27%
Byron Dorgan 60%
Robert Dornan 10%
David Dreier 18%
Jennifer Dunn 18%
Chet Edwards 60%
Vern Ehlers 20%
Bob Ehrlich, Jr. 18%
Bill Emerson 10%
Philip English 20%
John Ensign 18%
Lane Evans 100%
Terry Everett 18%
Thomas Ewing 18%
Jim Exon 80%
Duncan McLauchlin Faircloth 33%
Harris Fawell 18%
Victor Fazio 82%
Russ Feingold 70%
Cleo Fields 100%
Jack Fields, Jr. 10%
Bob Filner 90%
Floyd Flake 90%
Thomas Foglietta 100%
Mark Foley 18%
Michael Patrick Forbes 27%
Wendell Ford 70%
Tillie Fowler 22%
Jon David Fox 27%
Barney Frank 91%
Gary Franks 10%
Robert Franks 27%
William Frist 20%
Jonas Frost III 64%
Elizabeth Furse 80%
Elton Gallegly 20%
John Ganske 18%
Sam Gejdenson 91%
George Gekas 18%
Richard Andrew Gephardt 73%
Pete Geren 30%
Sam Gibbons 70%
Wayne Gilchrest 27%
Paul Gillmor 18%
Benjamin Gilman 27%
Newt Gingrich 0%
John Glenn 60%
Henry Gonzalez 70%
William Goodling 18%
Bart Gordon 36%
Slade Gorton 20%
Porter Goss 18%
Daniel Graham 67%
William Phillip Gramm 25%
Rodney Grams 20%
James Greenwood 27%
Judd Gregg 20%
Steven Gunderson 30%
Gilbert Gutknecht 18%
Tony Hall 70%
Lee Hamilton 45%
Melton Hancock 10%
James Hansen 18%
Jane Harman 44%
J. Dennis Hastert 18%
Mark Hatfield 70%
J.D. Hayworth, Jr. 18%
Joel Hefley 27%
W.G. Hefner 55%
Jesse Helms 20%
Wally Herger, Jr. 18%
Van Hilleary 18%
Earl Hilliard, Jr. 100%
Maurice Hinchey 82%
David Lee Hobson 18%
Pete Hoekstra 18%
Martin Hoke 30%
Thomas Holden 55%
Ernest Hollings 70%
Stephen Horn 27%
John Nathan Hostettler 27%
Amory Houghton, Jr. 27%
Duncan Hunter 18%
Kay Hutchison 33%
Henry Hyde 18%
Bob Inglis, Sr. 18%
Daniel Inouye 75%
Ernest Istook, Jr. 18%
Jesse Jackson, Jr. 100%
Andrew Jacobs, Jr. 90%
William Jefferson 100%
James Merrill Jeffords 30%
Nancy Johnson 45%
Harry Johnston 70%
J. Bennett Johnston 40%
Paul Kanjorski 73%
Nancy Landon Kassebaum 30%
Sue Kelly 27%
Dirk Kempthorne 20%
Edward Kennedy, Sr. 80%
Joseph Kennedy II 73%
Patrick Kennedy 82%
Barbara Bailey Kennelly 73%
Bob Kerrey 67%
Dale Kildee 73%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top