Rating Group: Michigan League of Conservation Voters

2009-2010 Lifetime Score

Issues: Environment
State Office Name Party Rating
MI U.S. House-3 Justin Amash R 0%
MI Lieutenant Governor Brian Calley R 30%
MI State House-5 Fred Durhal, Jr. D 94%
MI State House-6 Rashida Tlaib D 94%
MI State House-8 David Nathan D 94%
MI State House-12 Douglas Geiss D 100%
MI State House-13 Andrew Kandrevas D 89%
MI State House-18 Sarah Roberts D 100%
MI State House-19 John Walsh R 28%
MI State House-21 Dian Slavens D 100%
MI State House-22 Harold Haugh D 94%
MI State House-27 Ellen Lipton D 100%
MI State House-28 Jonathan Switalski D 100%
MI State House-34 Woodrow Stanley D 100%
MI State House-36 Pete Lund R 6%
MI State House-37 Vicki Barnett D 100%
MI State House-38 Hugh Crawford R 17%
MI State House-43 Gail Haines R 89%
MI State House-44 Eileen Kowall R 33%
MI State House-45 Tom McMillin R 0%
MI State House-47 Cynthia Denby R 22%
MI State House-58 Kenneth Kurtz R 6%
MI State House-59 Matt Lori R 17%
MI State House-62 Kate Segal D 100%
MI State House-63 Jase Bolger R 39%
MI State House-80 Bob Genetski R 0%
MI State House-82 Kevin Daley R 17%
MI State House-84 Terry Brown D 79%
MI State House-90 Joseph Haveman R 17%
MI State House-98 Jim Stamas R 17%
MI State House-104 Wayne Schmidt R 33%
MI State Senate-1 Coleman Young II D 97%
MI State Senate-2 Bert Johnson D 95%
MI State Senate-5 Tupac Hunter D 100%
MI State Senate-6 Glenn Anderson D 100%
MI State Senate-10 Tory Rocca R 69%
MI State Senate-12 James Marleau R 36%
MI State Senate-13 John Pappageorge R 21%
MI State Senate-14 Vincent Gregory D 100%
MI State Senate-17 Randy Richardville R 27%
MI State Senate-18 Rebekah Warren D 100%
MI State Senate-19 Michael Nofs R 0%
MI State Senate-21 John Proos IV R 33%
MI State Senate-23 Gretchen Whitmer D 95%
MI State Senate-24 Rick Jones R 37%
MI State Senate-25 Phil Pavlov R 21%
MI State Senate-28 Mark Jansen R 16%
MI State Senate-29 Dave Hildenbrand R 33%
MI State Senate-30 Arlan Meekhof R 26%
MI State Senate-32 Roger Kahn R 17%
MI State Senate-34 Goeff Hansen R 43%
MI State Senate-35 Darwin Booher R 22%
MI Commissioner-3 Martha Scott D 84%
MI Commissioner-5 Irma Clark-Coleman D 87%
MI Commissioner-9 Fred Miller D 100%
MI Commissioner-12 Richard LeBlanc D 78%
MI Commissioner-14 Raymond Basham D 94%
Dave Agema 9%
Jason Allen 25%
Kathy Angerer 100%
Richard Ball 52%
James Barcia 63%
Joan Bauer 100%
Douglas Bennett 77%
Patricia Birkholz 30%
Michael Bishop 20%
Timothy Bledsoe 100%
Elizabeth Brater 93%
Cameron Brown 23%
Lisa Brown 100%
Pam Byrnes 96%
Barbara Byrum 93%
Nancy Cassis 25%
Bill Caul 24%
Deborah Cherry 89%
Hansen Clarke 93%
Ed Clemente 80%
Bob Constan 100%
Marc Corriveau 100%
Andrew Coulouris 97%
Alan Cropsey 21%
George Cushingberry, Jr. 87%
Robert Dean 100%
Larry DeShazor 94%
Andy Dillon 76%
Marie Donigan 83%
Kate Ebli 97%
Kevin Elsenheimer 23%
John Espinoza 77%
Valdemar Garcia 26%
Tom George 28%
Judson Gilbert II 20%
John Gleason 85%
Lee Gonzales 84%
Kevin Green 30%
Martin Griffin 57%
Jennifer Haase 100%
Richard Hammel 84%
Bill Hardiman 25%
Kenneth Horn 30%
Michael Huckleberry 94%
Shanelle Jackson 72%
Gilda Jacobs 93%
Ron Jelinek 30%
Robert Jones 100%
Deb Kennedy 100%
Martin Knollenberg 29%
Wayne Kuipers 19%
Michael Lahti 94%
Gabriel Leland 96%
LaMar Lemmons, Jr. 90%
Steven Lindberg 100%
Lesia Liss 100%
Jeff Mayes 76%
Gary McDowell 92%
Michelle McManus 20%
Mark Meadows 100%
Tim Melton 100%
Kim Meltzer 29%
Tim Moore 26%
Chuck Moss 36%
Judy Nerat 89%
Andy Neumann 83%
Dennis Olshove 91%
Paul Opsommer 38%
Bruce Patterson 42%
Thomas Pearce 22%
Gino Polidori 90%
Michael Prusi 92%
Bill Rogers 33%
Alan Sanborn 28%
Roy Schmidt 94%
Tonya Schuitmaker 37%
Bettie Scott 85%
Paul Scott 72%
Daniel Collins Scripps 100%
Joel Sheltrown 74%
Jim Slezak 100%
Alma Smith 98%
Dudley Spade 64%
Tony Stamas 21%
Mickey Switalski 83%
Samuel Thomas III 88%
Sharon Tyler 50%
Mary Valentine 100%
Gerald Van Woerkom 23%
Jimmy Womack 94%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.