| State | Office | District | Name | Party | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MI | State Senate | 6 | Glenn Anderson | Democratic | 88% |
| MI | State Senate | 23 | Gretchen Whitmer | Democratic | 88% |
| MI | Mayor | At-Large | Paula Zelenko | 100% | |
| MI | Council Member | At-Large | Laura M. Toy | 50% | |
| MI | Commissioner | 7 | Burton Leland | 89% | |
| MI | Commissioner | 13 | Robert Gosselin | Republican | 38% |
| Stephen Adamini | 75% | ||||
| Jason Allen | 50% | ||||
| Raymond Basham | 75% | ||||
| Virg Bernero | 100% | ||||
| Patricia Birkholz | 50% | ||||
| Michael Bishop | 50% | ||||
| Cameron Brown | 38% | ||||
| Rich Brown | 88% | ||||
| Nancy Cassis | 50% | ||||
| Irma Clark-Coleman | 100% | ||||
| Hansen Clarke | 88% | ||||
| Leon Drolet | 25% | ||||
| Valdemar Garcia | 50% | ||||
| Tom George | 50% | ||||
| Judson Gilbert II | 50% | ||||
| Michael Goschka | 67% | ||||
| Beverly Hammerstrom | 44% | ||||
| Scott Hummel | 25% | ||||
| Gilda Jacobs | 100% | ||||
| Ron Jelinek | 50% | ||||
| R. Shirley Johnson | 44% | ||||
| Chris Kolb | 100% | ||||
| Jerry O. Kooiman | 50% | ||||
| Wayne Kuipers | 25% | ||||
| LaMar Lemmons, Jr. | 75% | ||||
| Alexander Lipsey | 88% | ||||
| Bill McConico | 100% | ||||
| Tom Meyer | 50% | ||||
| Michael Murphy | 75% | ||||
| Gary Newell | 38% | ||||
| Brian Palmer | 33% | ||||
| Bruce Patterson | 50% | ||||
| Jim Plakas | 63% | ||||
| Alan Sanborn | 75% | ||||
| Mark Schauer | 100% | ||||
| Martha Scott | 80% | ||||
| Kenneth Sikkema | 33% | ||||
| Dudley Spade | 88% | ||||
| Tony Stamas | 50% | ||||
| John Stewart | 50% | ||||
| Mickey Switalski | 100% | ||||
| Samuel Thomas III | 75% | ||||
| Barb Vander Veen | 50% | ||||
| Gerald Van Woerkom | 63% | ||||
| Mary Waters | 100% | ||||
| Carl Williams | 100% |
Issues:
Environment
How to Interpret these Evaluations
Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.
Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.
