Notice

Due to some issues we are having, our site has been put into read only mode. Some functionality may not work. Sorry for the inconvenience.

Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Teamsters Local 190

2005 Positions

Issues: Labor Unions
State Office District Name Party Rating
MT U.S. Senate Sr Jon Tester Democratic 92%
MT Lieutenant Governor Mike Cooney Democratic 100%
MT State House 32 Jonathan Windy Boy Democratic 100%
MT State House 54 Jeffrey Essmann Republican 17%
MT State House 73 Jim Keane Democratic 100%
MT State Senate 2 Dee Brown Republican 17%
MT State Senate 5 Bob Keenan Republican 17%
MT State Senate 9 Llewelyn Jones Republican 25%
MT State Senate 16 Frank Smith Democratic 100%
MT State Senate 35 Scott Sales Republican 0%
MT State Senate 37 Jon Sesso Democratic 100%
MT State Senate 41 Mary Caferro Democratic 100%
MT State Senate 42 Jill Cohenour Democratic 100%
MT State Senate 50 Tom Facey Democratic 100%
MT Secretary of State Corey Stapleton Republican 55%
MT Justice of the Supreme Court Seat 2 Mike Wheat Non-partisan 100%
MT Budget Director Dan Villa Democratic 100%
MT Council Member Ward 1 Brent Cromley 92%
MT Commissioner 1 Ray Hawk 0%
MT Superintendent of Public Instruction Elsie Arntzen Republican 50%
Joan Andersen 8%
Keith Bales 8%
Joe Balyeat 8%
John Balyeat 0%
Gregory Barkus 8%
Debby Barrett 0%
Arlene Becker 100%
Bob Bergren 100%
Norma Bixby 100%
Jerry Black 8%
Gary Branae 100%
Roy Brown 33%
John Brueggeman 42%
Edward Butcher 8%
Rosalie Buzzas 100%
Terrence Callahan 100%
Margarett Campbell 100%
Paul Clark 100%
John Cobb 83%
Vicki Cocchiarella 92%
Aubyn Curtiss 17%
Sue Dickenson 100%
Tim Dowell 100%
Robyn Driscoll 100%
Emelie Kay Eaton 100%
Jon Ellingson 100%
Jim Elliott 100%
John Esp 17%
George Loren Everett 0%
Eve Franklin 100%
Kevin Furey 100%
David Gallik 100%
Steven Gallus 100%
Kathleen Galvin-Halcro 100%
Kelly Gebhardt 33%
Kim Gillan 100%
William Glaser 25%
George Golie 100%
Duane Grimes 17%
Wanda Grinde 100%
George Groesbeck 100%
Gail Gutsche 100%
Robin Hamilton 100%
Kenneth Hansen 100%
Dan Harrington 100%
Christopher Kirk Harris 100%
Robert Hawks 100%
Ralph Heinert, Jr. 0%
Gordon Hendrick 42%
Teresa Henry 100%
Dennis Himmelberger 17%
Cynthia Hiner 100%
Verdell Jackson 0%
Hal Jacobson 100%
Joey Jayne 100%
Larry Jent 100%
Bill Jones 17%
Mike Jopek 100%
Carol Juneau 100%
Christine Kaufmann 100%
Sam Kitzenberg 92%
Harry Klock 25%
Roger Koopman 0%
Richard Laible 17%
Bob Lake 0%
Carol Lambert 25%
Michael Lange 58%
Lane Larson 100%
Jesse Laslovich 100%
Ralph Lenhart 58%
Dave Lewis 58%
Greg Lind 100%
Monica Lindeen 100%
Gary MacLaren 17%
Rick Maedje 17%
Bruce Malcolm 8%
Jeff Mangan 92%
Gary Matthews 75%
Dave McAlpin 100%
Daniel McGee 8%
Tom McGillvray 25%
Joe McKenney 8%
Walter McNutt 8%
Scott Mendenhall 0%
Mike Milburn 17%
Penny Armstrong Morgan 17%
Lynda Moss 92%
John Musgrove 100%
Mark Noennig 42%
Art Noonan 100%
Alan Olson 42%
Bernie Olson 58%
Jerry O'Neil 8%
John Parker 100%
Gerald Pease 91%
Gary Perry 25%
Jim Peterson 8%
Holly Raser 100%
Diane Rice 0%
Rick Ripley 0%
Donald Roberts 17%
John Ross 33%
Glenn Roush 100%
Don Ryan 100%
Trudi Schmidt 100%
Jim Shockley 58%
John Sinrud 8%
Veronica Small-Eastman 100%
Jon Sonju 17%
Carolyn Squires 100%
Wayne Stahl 50%
Donald Steinbeisser 8%
Ronald Stoker 25%
Robert Story, Jr. 17%
Bill Tash 25%
Janna Taylor 8%
Kenneth Toole, Jr. 100%
Joseph Tropila 92%
Pat Wagman 17%
Karl Waitschies 25%
David Wanzenried 100%
John Ward 42%
Bill Warden 33%
Dan Weinberg 92%
Jack Wells 8%
Carol Williams 100%
Bill Wilson 100%
Jeanne Windham 100%
Brady Wiseman 100%
John Witt 8%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top

Help us stay free for all your Fellow Americans

Just $5 from everyone reading this would do it.

Back to top