Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Teamsters Local 190

2003 Positions

Issues: Labor Unions
State Office District Name Party Rating
MT U.S. Senate Sr Jon Tester Democratic 100%
MT State House 3 Jerry O'Neil Republican 33%
MT State House 96 Carolyn Squires Democratic 100%
MT State Senate 2 Dee Brown Republican 15%
MT State Senate 5 Verdell Jackson Republican 8%
MT State Senate 9 Rick Ripley Republican 8%
MT State Senate 15 Jim Peterson Republican 8%
MT State Senate 16 Jonathan Windy Boy Democratic 85%
MT State Senate 23 Alan Olson Republican 15%
MT State Senate 32 Larry Jent Democratic 100%
MT State Senate 34 Scott Sales Republican 23%
MT State Senate 36 Debby Barrett Republican 8%
MT State Senate 38 Jim Keane Democratic 83%
MT State Senate 41 Christine Kaufmann Democratic 100%
MT State Senate 42 Dave Lewis Republican 8%
MT State Senate 45 Fred Thomas Republican 8%
MT State Senate 48 Tom Facey Democratic 100%
MT State Senate 49 David Wanzenried Democratic 92%
MT Justice of the Supreme Court Seat 2 Mike Wheat Non-partisan 92%
MT Auditor Monica Lindeen Democratic 92%
MT Council Member Ward 1 Brent Cromley Democratic 92%
MT Public Service Commission Vice Chair Bob Lake Republican 8%
Joan Andersen 15%
Sherm Anderson 0%
Keith Bales 8%
Norman Ballantyne 92%
Joe Balyeat 25%
Gregory Barkus 8%
Arlene Becker 100%
Bob Bergren 77%
Rodney Bitney 0%
Norma Bixby 100%
Jerry Black 17%
John Bohlinger 58%
Sylvia Bookout-Reinicke 27%
Gary Branae 100%
Roy Brown 0%
John Brueggeman 8%
Edward Butcher 27%
Rosalie Buzzas 100%
Terrence Callahan 100%
Eileen Carney 92%
Edith Clark 8%
Paul Clark 100%
John Cobb 82%
Vicki Cocchiarella 75%
Jill Cohenour 92%
Mike Cooney 100%
Aubyn Curtiss 25%
Larry Cyr 92%
Robert DePratu 25%
Ronald Devlin 8%
Sue Dickenson 100%
Tim Dowell 92%
Jon Ellingson 92%
Jim Elliott 100%
Ron Erickson 100%
John Esp 8%
George Loren Everett 8%
Stanley Fisher 15%
Gary Forrester 38%
Eve Franklin 100%
Nancy Rice Fritz 100%
Daniel Clint Fuchs 0%
David Gallik 100%
Steven Gallus 85%
Kathleen Galvin-Halcro 100%
Kelly Gebhardt 18%
Carol Gibson 100%
Kim Gillan 100%
William Glaser 17%
George Golie 100%
Duane Grimes 17%
Gail Gutsche 100%
Richard Haines 23%
Kenneth Hansen 100%
Dan Harrington 100%
Christopher Kirk Harris 100%
Ray Hawk 8%
Donald Hedges 8%
Daniel Hurwitz 15%
Hal Jacobson 100%
Joey Jayne 92%
Royal Johnson 42%
Carol Juneau 100%
Dave Kasten 15%
Bob Keenan 0%
Sam Kitzenberg 75%
Richard Laible 8%
Carol Lambert 23%
Michael Lange 31%
Jesse Laslovich 77%
Jeff Laszloffy 8%
Bob Lawson 38%
Larry Lehman 8%
Ralph Lenhart 69%
Rick Maedje 23%
Dale Mahlum 17%
Bruce Malcolm 31%
Jeff Mangan 75%
Gary Matthews 31%
Bea McCarthy 75%
Daniel McGee 0%
Joe McKenney 0%
Walter McNutt 25%
Scott Mendenhall 0%
Doug Mood 0%
Penny Armstrong Morgan 0%
John Musgrove 100%
Linda Nelson 82%
Brad Newman 85%
Mark Noennig 15%
Bernie Olson 23%
John Parker 100%
Jeffrey Pattison 8%
Gerald Pease 83%
Gary Perry 25%
Holly Raser 100%
Diane Rice 8%
Donald Roberts 8%
N. Allen Rome 15%
John Ross 15%
Glenn Roush 92%
Brennan Ryan 85%
Don Ryan 100%
Trudi Schmidt 100%
Clarice Schrumpf 8%
Debbie Bowman Shea 75%
Jim Shockley 31%
John Sinrud 8%
Veronica Small-Eastman 92%
Frank Smith 92%
Mike Sprague 27%
Corey Stapleton 0%
Donald Steinbeisser 15%
Ronald Stoker 8%
Emily Stonington 73%
Robert Story, Jr. 17%
Bill Tash 8%
Mike Taylor 17%
William Thomas 8%
Kenneth Toole, Jr. 100%
Joseph Tropila 92%
Pat Wagman 8%
Karl Waitschies 8%
Sandy Weiss 100%
Bill Wilson 92%
John Witt 15%
Cindy Younkin 8%
Tom Zook 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top