Search Form
Now choose a category »

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Jericho

2005 Positions

Issues: Social
State Office District Name Party Rating
CA U.S. House 1 Doug LaMalfa Republican 33%
CA U.S. House 4 Tom McClintock Republican 11%
CA U.S. House 10 Jeff Denham Republican 33%
CA U.S. House 14 Jackie Speier Democratic 89%
CA U.S. House 23 Kevin McCarthy Republican 44%
CA U.S. House 27 Judy Chu Democratic 100%
CA U.S. House 35 Gloria Negrete McLeod Democratic 100%
CA U.S. House 37 Karen Bass Democratic 100%
CA U.S. House 45 John Campbell III Republican 22%
CA U.S. House 47 Alan Lowenthal Democratic 100%
CA U.S. House 51 Juan Vargas Democratic 100%
CA State Assembly 2 Wesley Chesbro Democratic 89%
CA State Senate 2 Noreen Evans Democratic 100%
CA State Senate 3 Lois Wolk Democratic 100%
CA State Senate 8 Leland Yee Democratic 100%
CA State Senate 9 Loni Hancock Democratic 100%
CA State Senate 11 Mark Leno Democratic 100%
CA State Senate 25 Carol Liu Democratic 100%
CA State Senate 27 Fran Pavley Democratic 100%
CA State Senate 29 Robert Huff Republican 44%
CA State Senate 30 Ron Calderon Democratic 100%
CA State Senate 37 Mimi Walters Republican 33%
CA State Senate 38 Mark Wyland Republican 33%
CA Secretary of State Debra Bowen Democratic 100%
CA Insurance Commissioner Dave Jones Democratic 100%
CA Supervisor 2 Mark Ridley-Thomas Democratic 100%
CA Supervisor 3 Wilma Chan Democratic 100%
CA Supervisor 3 Todd Spitzer Republican 44%
CA Supervisor 4 John Benoit 44%
CA Supervisor 5 Saren Simitian Democratic 100%
CA Council Member 1 Gilbert Cedillo Democratic 100%
CA Council Member 5 Paul Koretz Democratic 100%
CA Council Member 6 David Cogdill Republican 44%
CA Council Member At-Large Joe Baca, Jr. 100%
CA Council Member At-Large Alan Nakanishi 56%
CA Superintendent of Public Instruction Tom Torlakson Democratic 100%
Samuel Aanestad 44%
Richard Ackerman 33%
Gregory Aghazarian 44%
Richard Alarcón 100%
Elaine Alquist 100%
Juan Arambula 100%
Roy Ashburn 33%
James Battin 22%
Patty Berg 100%
Rudy Bermúdez 100%
Sam Blakeslee 44%
Russell Bogh 44%
Joseph Canciamilla 78%
Edward Chavez 100%
Rebecca Cohn 100%
Joe Coto 100%
Dave Cox 44%
Lynn Daucher 56%
Hector De La Torre 100%
Charles DeVore 33%
Denise Ducheny 89%
Joseph Dunn 100%
Robert Dutton 44%
Mervyn Dymally 100%
Bill Emmerson 56%
Martha Escutia 78%
Liz Figueroa 100%
Dean Florez 89%
Dario Frommer 89%
Bonnie Garcia 78%
Jackie Goldberg 100%
Tom Harman 44%
Ray Haynes, Jr. 33%
Dennis Hollingsworth 22%
Jerome Horton 89%
Shirley Horton 78%
Guy Houston 44%
Betty Karnette 89%
Richard Keene 44%
Christine Kehoe 100%
Johan Klehs 100%
Sheila Kuehl 100%
John Laird 100%
Jay La Suer 33%
Robert Leslie 44%
Lloyd Levine 100%
Sally Lieber 100%
Michael Machado 78%
Abel Maldonado 78%
Bob Margett 33%
Barbara Matthews 89%
Bill Maze 44%
Carole Migden 89%
Cindy Montañez 100%
William Phillip Morrow 22%
Dennis Lee Mountjoy 44%
Eugene Mullin 100%
Kevin Murray 44%
Joseph Nation 100%
Pedro Nava 89%
Roger Niello 44%
Fabian Núñez 100%
Jenny Oropeza 100%
Deborah Ortiz 100%
Nicole Parra 100%
Don Perata 100%
George Plescia 44%
Charles Poochigian 44%
Keith Stuart Richman 56%
Gloria Romero 100%
George Runner, Jr. 33%
Sharon Runner 44%
Ira Ruskin 100%
Lori Saldaña 100%
Simón Salinas 100%
Jack Scott 100%
Nell Soto 100%
Audra Strickland 44%
Alberto Torrico 100%
Van Tran 56%
Thomas Umberg 89%
Mike Villines 44%
Edward Vincent 67%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top