Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Republican Liberty Caucus

2005 Economic Liberties Score

State Office District Name Party Rating
Neil Abercrombie 5%
Gary Ackerman 10%
Daniel Akaka, Sr. 10%
Todd Akin 95%
Rodney Alexander 80%
Wayne Allard 95%
George Allen 80%
Thomas Allen 10%
Rob Andrews 38%
Joe Baca, Sr. 32%
Spencer Bachus 74%
Brian Baird 21%
Richard Hugh Baker 75%
J. Gresham Barrett 90%
John Barrow 15%
Roscoe Bartlett 78%
Charlie Bass 75%
Max Baucus 32%
Evan Bayh 10%
Melissa Bean 40%
Bob Beauprez 85%
Bob Bennett 84%
Shelley Berkley 21%
Howard Berman 10%
Marion Berry 50%
Judy Biggert 70%
Michael Bilirakis 63%
Jeff Bingaman 20%
Tim Bishop 20%
Sherwood Boehlert 70%
Kit Bond 90%
Henry Bonilla 74%
Jo Bonner, Jr. 90%
Mary Bono Mack 65%
Dan Boren 60%
Leonard Boswell 32%
Rick Boucher 30%
Allen Boyd, Jr. 41%
Henry Brown, Jr. 84%
Ginny Brown-Waite 70%
Jim Bunning 90%
Conrad Burns 85%
Dan Burton 80%
Steve Buyer 85%
Robert Byrd 15%
Dave Camp 71%
Chris Cannon 90%
Eric Cantor 80%
Dennis Cardoza 35%
Russ Carnahan 15%
Julia Carson 25%
Edward Case 30%
Mike Castle 70%
Lincoln Chafee 45%
Saxby Chambliss 90%
Ben Chandler III 35%
Chris Chocola 90%
Hillary Clinton 11%
Howard Coble 78%
Thomas Coburn 95%
Norm Coleman 55%
Kent Conrad 11%
Jerry Costello 25%
Larry Craig 85%
Robert Cramer 58%
Barbara Cubin 74%
Artur Davis 35%
Geoff Davis 70%
James Davis 25%
Jo Ann Davis 61%
Lincoln Davis 40%
Thomas Davis III 53%
Bill Delahunt 13%
Thomas DeLay 68%
James DeMint 95%
Lincoln Diaz-Balart 78%
Norm Dicks 15%
John Dingell 20%
Chris Dodd 10%
Elizabeth Dole 80%
Pete Domenici, Jr. 80%
John Doolittle 74%
Byron Dorgan 5%
Thelma Drake 75%
David Dreier 70%
Chet Edwards 40%
Vern Ehlers 65%
Jo Ann Emerson 74%
Philip English 85%
John Ensign 100%
Bob Etheridge 25%
Lane Evans 5%
Terry Everett 74%
Tom Feeney 90%
Russ Feingold 10%
Michael Ferguson 70%
Bob Filner 20%
Mark Foley 74%
Harold Ford, Jr. 30%
Vito Fossella, Jr. 80%
Barney Frank 15%
William Frist 90%
Elton Gallegly 70%
Jim Gerlach 50%
Jim Gibbons 82%
Wayne Gilchrest 55%
Paul Gillmor 72%
Phil Gingrey 85%
Charlie Gonzalez 30%
Virgil Goode, Jr. 63%
Bart Gordon 45%
Mark Green 75%
Judd Gregg 100%
Gilbert Gutknecht 80%
Charles Hagel 90%
Ralph Hall 70%
Tom Harkin 5%
Jane Harman 33%
Katherine Harris 74%
Melissa Hart 65%
J. Dennis Hastert 100%
Doc Hastings 74%
Robert Hayes 80%
J.D. Hayworth, Jr. 100%
Joel Hefley 79%
Wally Herger, Jr. 80%
Stephanie Herseth Sandlin 37%
Maurice Hinchey 0%
David Lee Hobson 72%
Pete Hoekstra 85%
Thomas Holden 25%
Rush Holt, Jr. 10%
Darlene Hooley 20%
John Nathan Hostettler 80%
Kenny Hulshof 74%
Duncan Hunter 65%
Kay Hutchison 80%
Henry Hyde 80%
Bob Inglis, Sr. 85%
Daniel Inouye 15%
Ernest Istook, Jr. 90%
Jesse Jackson, Jr. 10%
William Jefferson 41%
James Merrill Jeffords 11%
William Lewis Jenkins 80%
Nancy Johnson 50%
Tim Johnson 60%
Timothy Johnson 5%
Paul Kanjorski 25%
Ric Keller 75%
Sue Kelly 63%
Edward Kennedy, Sr. 10%
Mark Kennedy 75%
Patrick Kennedy 5%
Dale Kildee 10%
Carolyn Kilpatrick 15%
Jack Kingston 84%
Joseph Knollenberg 75%
Herb Kohl 10%
James Kolbe 85%
Dennis Kucinich 20%
John Kuhl, Jr. 75%
Jon Kyl 100%
Ray LaHood 67%
Mary Landrieu 25%
Tom Lantos 16%
Tom Latham 65%
Steve LaTourette 59%
Frank Lautenberg 5%
James Leach 67%
Carl Levin 0%
Jerry Lewis 70%
Ron Lewis 70%
Joe Lieberman 6%
Blanche Lincoln 25%
John Linder 95%
Trent Lott, Sr. 100%
Dick Lugar 90%
Dan Lungren 85%
Connie Mack IV 80%
Don Manzullo 90%
Jim Marshall 30%
Melquiades Martinez 85%
Jim Matheson 60%
Carolyn McCarthy 25%
Thaddeus McCotter 60%
James McCrery III 70%
John McHugh 65%
Mike McIntyre 40%
Buck McKeon 70%
Cynthia Ann McKinney 20%
Michael McNulty 5%
Martin Meehan 15%
Kendrick Meek, Sr. 25%
Charlie Melancon, Sr. 47%
Mike Michaud 30%
Juanita Millender-McDonald 11%
Gary Miller 90%
George Miller 16%
Brad Miller 15%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top