Search Form
Now choose a category »

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: AIDS Project Los Angeles

2000 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
CA U.S. House 14 Jackie Speier Democratic 83
CA U.S. House 16 Jim Costa Democratic 83
CA U.S. House 29 Tony Cárdenas Democratic 100
CA U.S. House 47 Alan Lowenthal Democratic 100
CA State Assembly 2 Wesley Chesbro Democratic 100
CA State Senate 6 Darrell Steinberg Democratic 100
CA State Senate 10 Ellen Corbett Democratic 100
CA State Senate 19 Hannah-Beth Jackson Democratic 100
CA State Senate 34 Lou Correa Democratic 86
CA State Senate 35 Roderick Wright Democratic 100
CA Secretary of State Debra Bowen Democratic 100
CA Supervisor 4 Dick Monteith 83
CA Supervisor 5 Bruce McPherson 83
CA Council Member 1 Gilbert Cedillo Democratic 100
Samuel Aanestad 86
Richard Alarcón 100
Deirdre Alpert 67
Elaine Alquist 100
Dion Aroner 86
Roy Ashburn 57
Pat Bates 100
Mike Briggs 71
James Brulte 83
John Burton 100
Thomas Calderon 100
Bill Campbell 86
Dennis Cardoza 100
Dave Cox 86
Richard Dickerson 86
Joseph Dunn 100
John Anthony Dutra 100
Martha Escutia 100
Liz Figueroa 100
Marco Antonio Firebaugh 71
Dean Florez 86
Sally Havice 100
Robert Hertzberg 100
K. Maurice Johannessen 83
Ross Johnson 33
Betty Karnette 100
Fred Keeley 100
William Knight 50
Bill Leonard 57
Sally Lieber endorse
John Longville 100
Ken Maddox 86
Abel Maldonado 86
Carole Migden 100
William Phillip Morrow 50
Kevin Murray 100
George Nakano 86
Fabian Núñez endorse
Jack O'Connell 100
Deborah Ortiz 100
Robert Pacheco 86
Rod Pacheco 57
Louis Papan 100
Steve Peace 67
Don Perata 100
Anthony Pescetti 86
Richard Polanco 83
Charles Poochigian 83
Sarah Reyes 100
Gloria Romero 100
George Runner, Jr. 71
Kevin Shelley 100
Byron Sher 100
Nell Soto 100
Tony Strickland 71
Virginia Strom-Martin 100
Helen Thomson 100
John Vasconcellos 100
Carl Washington 100
Howard Wayne 100
Herb Wesson, Jr. 100
Patricia Wiggins 86
Charlene Zettel 86

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top