Rating Group: AACF-Kids Count-Fairness Issues

2003 Fairness Score

Issues: Marriage, Family, and Children
How to Interpret these Evaluations
State Office Name Party Rating
AR State House-17 Henry Wilkins IV D 60%
AR State House-76 Denny Altes R 60%
AR State Senate-3 Cecile Bledsoe R 33%
AR State Senate-16 Michael Lamoureux R 33%
AR State Senate-17 Johnny Key R 50%
AR State Senate-21 Paul Bookout D 33%
AR State Senate-30 Linda Chesterfield D 67%
AR State Senate-31 Joyce Elliott D 50%
AR State Senate-33 Jeremy Hutchinson R 33%
AR Insurance Commissioner Jay Bradford D 33%
AR County Judge-At-Large Preston Scroggin Other 67%
Bob Adams Other 50%
Sarah Agee Other 67%
Keven Anderson Other 50%
James Argue, Jr. Other 40%
Gilbert Baker Other 40%
Russell Bennett Other 33%
Stan Berry Other 50%
Gary Biggs Other 33%
David Bisbee Other 20%
Buddy Blair Other 67%
Johnnie Bolin Other 50%
Will Bond Other 50%
Jerry Bookout Other 40%
Shirley Borhauer Other 33%
Travis Boyd Other 33%
Stephen Bright Other 33%
Shane Broadway Other 40%
Irma Brown Other 60%
Steve Bryles Other 40%
John Paul Capps Other 20%
Marvin Childers Other 50%
Booker Clemons Other 67%
Herschel Cleveland Other 50%
Kenneth Wayne Cowling Other 33%
Mike Creekmore Other 33%
Jack Critcher Other 60%
Leroy Dangeau Other 33%
Joyce Dees Other 50%
Tommy Dickinson Other 33%
Roosevelt Dwayne Dobbins Other 33%
John Eason Other 50%
Marilyn Edwards Other 50%
A. David Evans Other 33%
Lenville Evans, Sr. Other 33%
Steve Faris Other 60%
Danny Ferguson Other 33%
Dwight Fite Other 67%
Jeff Gillespie Other 33%
Billy Gipson Other 50%
Bobby Glover Other 20%
Kevin Goss Other 33%
Mary Beth Green Other 33%
Brenda Gullett Other 60%
David Haak Other 33%
Horace Hardwick Other 33%
Eric Harris Other 33%
Mike Hathorn Other 33%
Kim Hendren Other 20%
Boyd Hickinbotham Other 33%
Stephen W. Higginbothom, Sr. Other 40%
Jim Hill Other 40%
Jim Holt Other 40%
Barbara Horn Other 40%
Don House Other 33%
Phillip Jackson Other 33%
Phillip Truman Jacobs Other 50%
Gene Jeffress Other 60%
Jimmy Jeffress Other 60%
Robert Jeffrey Other 50%
Bob Johnson Other 60%
Calvin Johnson Other 33%
Janet Johnson Other 67%
Steven Jones Other 50%
Janice Ann Judy Other 50%
Mike Kenney Other 33%
Barbara Jean King Other 33%
Randy Laverty Other 60%
Sam Ledbetter Other 50%
Jim Lendall Other 50%
John Lewellen Other 50%
James Luker Other 40%
Dewayne Mack Other 33%
Sue Madison Other 40%
Jodie Mahony Other 50%
W. Percy Malone Other 40%
Jay Martin Other 50%
Douglas Matayo Other 50%
Bob Mathis Other 67%
Jim Medley Other 50%
Paul Miller Other 40%
Jimmy Milligan Other 67%
Thomas Moore Other 50%
Steve Napper Other 33%
William Wayne Nichols Other 50%
James Norton Other 50%
James Oglesby Other 50%
Charles Ormond Other 33%
Daryl Pace Other 50%
Marvin Parks Other 33%
Mark Pate Other 50%
Kevin Penix Other 33%
Benny Petrus Other 67%
Betty Pickett Other 50%
Larry Prater Other 50%
Sandra Prater Other 33%
Bill Pritchard Other 33%
Randy Morton Rankin Other 33%
Tommy Roebuck Other 33%
Sid Rosenbaum Other 33%
Mary Salmon Other 40%
Susan Schulte Other 50%
Bill Scrimshire Other 50%
Harmon Seawel Other 50%
M. Roger Smith Other 33%
William Smith Other 60%
Tracy Steele Other 40%
Bill Stovall III Other 50%
Scott Sullivan Other 33%
Denny Sumpter Other 50%
Chaney Taylor, Jr. Other 50%
Jerry Taylor Other 50%
Lindbergh Howard Thomas Other 50%
Chris Thomason Other 67%
Chris Thyer Other 50%
Sharon Trusty Other 20%
John Paul Verkamp Other 50%
Shirley Walters Other 50%
Paul Weaver Other 67%
Ruth Whitaker Other 60%
Robert White Other 33%
James Wilkinson Other 40%
Shawn Womack Other 80%
Jeff Wood Other 33%
Tim Wooldridge Other 40%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.