Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Transportation Communications Union

2001 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Marion Berry 100%
Judy Biggert 43%
Michael Bilirakis 57%
Jeff Bingaman 100%
Rod Blagojevich 100%
Sherwood Boehlert 71%
Kit Bond 9%
Henry Bonilla 43%
David Edward Bonior 100%
Mary Bono Mack 50%
Robert Borski, Jr. 100%
Leonard Boswell 100%
Rick Boucher 100%
Allen Boyd, Jr. 71%
John Breaux 91%
Henry Brown, Jr. 43%
Ed Bryant 43%
Jim Bunning 0%
Conrad Burns 9%
Dan Burton 40%
Steve Buyer 57%
Robert Byrd 100%
Herbert Callahan 43%
Dave Camp 57%
Ben Campbell 27%
Chris Cannon 43%
Eric Cantor 43%
Jean Carnahan 100%
Brad Carson 86%
Julia Carson 100%
Mike Castle 57%
Lincoln Chafee 91%
Saxby Chambliss 57%
Eva Clayton 100%
Joseph Maxwell Cleland 100%
Robert Clement 71%
Hillary Clinton 100%
Howard Coble 43%
Michael Collins 57%
Larry Combest 57%
Gary Condit 100%
Kent Conrad 91%
John Cooksey 33%
Jon Corzine 100%
Jerry Costello 100%
Christopher Cox 14%
William Coyne 100%
Larry Craig 27%
Robert Cramer 67%
Philip Crane 43%
Barbara Cubin 25%
Randall Cunningham 57%
Thomas Daschle 100%
James Davis 86%
Jo Ann Davis 57%
Thomas Davis III 33%
Bill Delahunt 100%
Thomas DeLay 14%
James DeMint 14%
Peter Deutsch 100%
Lincoln Diaz-Balart 43%
Norm Dicks 100%
John Dingell 100%
Chris Dodd 100%
Pete Domenici, Jr. 40%
Calvin Dooley 50%
John Doolittle 57%
Byron Dorgan 100%
David Dreier 43%
Jennifer Dunn 43%
John Edwards 100%
Chet Edwards 100%
Vern Ehlers 43%
Bob Ehrlich, Jr. 33%
Jo Ann Emerson 43%
Philip English 57%
John Ensign 18%
Bob Etheridge 100%
Lane Evans 100%
Terry Everett 43%
Russ Feingold 91%
Michael Ferguson 71%
Bob Filner 100%
Peter Fitzgerald 45%
Ernest Fletcher 43%
Mark Foley 50%
Harold Ford, Jr. 100%
Vito Fossella, Jr. 40%
Barney Frank 100%
William Frist 0%
Jonas Frost III 100%
Elton Gallegly 57%
John Ganske 83%
George Gekas 43%
Richard Andrew Gephardt 100%
Jim Gibbons 43%
Wayne Gilchrest 33%
Paul Gillmor 43%
Benjamin Gilman 71%
Charlie Gonzalez 83%
Virgil Goode, Jr. 57%
Bart Gordon 86%
Porter Goss 43%
Daniel Graham 100%
William Phillip Gramm 0%
Mark Green 57%
James Greenwood 43%
Judd Gregg 0%
Felix Grucci, Jr. 71%
Gilbert Gutknecht 57%
Charles Hagel 45%
Ralph Hall 71%
Tony Hall 100%
James Hansen 43%
Tom Harkin 100%
Jane Harman 100%
Melissa Hart 57%
J. Dennis Hastert 0%
Doc Hastings 43%
Robert Hayes 43%
J.D. Hayworth, Jr. 43%
Joel Hefley 29%
Jesse Helms 0%
Wally Herger, Jr. 14%
Baron Hill 86%
Van Hilleary 57%
Earl Hilliard, Jr. 100%
Maurice Hinchey 100%
David Lee Hobson 43%
Joseph Hoeffel 100%
Pete Hoekstra 29%
Thomas Holden 100%
Ernest Hollings 91%
Rush Holt, Jr. 100%
Darlene Hooley 100%
Stephen Horn 71%
John Nathan Hostettler 33%
Amory Houghton, Jr. 43%
Kenny Hulshof 43%
Duncan Hunter 57%
Y. Tim Hutchinson 45%
Kay Hutchison 25%
Henry Hyde 50%
Daniel Inouye 100%
Ernest Istook, Jr. 33%
Jesse Jackson, Jr. 100%
William Jefferson 100%
James Merrill Jeffords 91%
William Lewis Jenkins 43%
Christopher John 71%
Nancy Johnson 43%
Tim Johnson 71%
Timothy Johnson 100%
Paul Kanjorski 100%
Ric Keller 50%
Sue Kelly 57%
Edward Kennedy, Sr. 100%
Mark Kennedy 43%
Patrick Kennedy 100%
Brian Kerns 43%
Dale Kildee 100%
Carolyn Kilpatrick 100%
Jack Kingston 43%
Gerald Kleczka 100%
Joseph Knollenberg 43%
Herb Kohl 100%
James Kolbe 14%
Dennis Kucinich 100%
Jon Kyl 0%
John LaFalce 100%
Ray LaHood 57%
Nicholas Lampson 100%
Mary Landrieu 90%
Tom Lantos 100%
Tom Latham 43%
Steve LaTourette 50%
James Leach 67%
Carl Levin 91%
Jerry Lewis 33%
Ron Lewis 43%
Joe Lieberman 100%
Blanche Lincoln 91%
John Linder 43%
William Lipinski 100%
Trent Lott, Sr. 0%
Ken Lucas 71%
Dick Lugar 0%
William Luther 100%
James Maloney 100%
Don Manzullo 57%
Frank Mascara 100%
Jim Matheson 86%
Robert Matsui 100%
Carolyn McCarthy 100%
Karen McCarthy 100%
James McCrery III 43%
John McHugh 71%
Mike McIntyre 86%
Buck McKeon 43%
Cynthia Ann McKinney 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top