Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Concord Coalition

1995 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Michael Collins 52%
Larry Combest 50%
Gary Condit 55%
Kent Conrad 52%
Wes Cooley 50%
Jerry Costello 36%
Paul Coverdell 44%
Christopher Cox 50%
William Coyne 32%
Larry Craig 44%
Robert Cramer 41%
Philip Crane 48%
Frank Arnold Cremeans 59%
Barbara Cubin 48%
Randall Cunningham 45%
Alfonse D'Amato 44%
Patsy Ann Danner 41%
Thomas Daschle 32%
Thomas Davis III 68%
E. Kika de la Garza 41%
Thomas DeLay 45%
Ronald Dellums 32%
Peter Deutsch 41%
Lincoln Diaz-Balart 45%
Jay Dickey 50%
Norm Dicks 36%
Julian Dixon 24%
Chris Dodd 40%
Robert Dole 48%
Pete Domenici, Jr. 52%
Calvin Dooley 52%
John Doolittle 50%
Byron Dorgan 40%
Robert Dornan 45%
David Dreier 48%
Jennifer Dunn 50%
Chet Edwards 23%
Vern Ehlers 50%
Bob Ehrlich, Jr. 45%
Bill Emerson 45%
Philip English 55%
John Ensign 59%
Lane Evans 27%
Terry Everett 50%
Thomas Ewing 48%
Jim Exon 44%
Duncan McLauchlin Faircloth 48%
Harris Fawell 50%
Victor Fazio 32%
Russ Feingold 52%
Cleo Fields 22%
Jack Fields, Jr. 50%
Bob Filner 29%
Floyd Flake 32%
Michael Patrick Flanagan 45%
Thomas Foglietta 29%
Mark Foley 55%
Michael Patrick Forbes 45%
Harold Ford, Sr. 33%
Wendell Ford 24%
Tillie Fowler 45%
Jon David Fox 50%
Barney Frank 32%
Gary Franks 41%
Robert Franks 59%
Dan Frisa 50%
William Frist 44%
Jonas Frost III 23%
David Funderburk 50%
Elizabeth Furse 50%
Elton Gallegly 48%
John Ganske 57%
Sam Gejdenson 23%
George Gekas 45%
Richard Andrew Gephardt 20%
Pete Geren 64%
Sam Gibbons 48%
Wayne Gilchrest 45%
Paul Gillmor 48%
Benjamin Gilman 50%
John Glenn 36%
Henry Gonzalez 18%
William Goodling 57%
Bart Gordon 32%
Slade Gorton 52%
Porter Goss 50%
Daniel Graham 44%
William Phillip Gramm 54%
Rodney Grams 56%
Enid Greene 50%
James Greenwood 55%
Judd Gregg 54%
Steven Gunderson 68%
Gilbert Gutknecht 55%
Tony Hall 43%
Lee Hamilton 59%
Melton Hancock 50%
James Hansen 48%
Jane Harman 50%
J. Dennis Hastert 45%
Mark Hatfield 45%
James Hayes 45%
J.D. Hayworth, Jr. 50%
Joel Hefley 50%
W.G. Hefner 32%
Fredrick Kenneth Fred' Heineman 50%
Jesse Helms 44%
Wally Herger, Jr. 55%
Van Hilleary 55%
Earl Hilliard, Jr. 26%
Maurice Hinchey 23%
David Lee Hobson 45%
Pete Hoekstra 64%
Martin Hoke 50%
Thomas Holden 27%
Ernest Hollings 40%
Stephen Horn 59%
John Nathan Hostettler 41%
Amory Houghton, Jr. 52%
Duncan Hunter 36%
Y. Tim Hutchinson 55%
Kay Hutchison 48%
Henry Hyde 45%
Bob Inglis, Sr. 59%
Daniel Inouye 28%
Ernest Istook, Jr. 57%
Andrew Jacobs, Jr. 59%
William Jefferson 25%
James Merrill Jeffords 56%
Nancy Johnson 59%
Harry Johnston 33%
J. Bennett Johnston 42%
Paul Kanjorski 32%
Nancy Landon Kassebaum 50%
Sue Kelly 50%
Dirk Kempthorne 44%
Edward Kennedy, Sr. 40%
Joseph Kennedy II 50%
Patrick Kennedy 23%
Barbara Bailey Kennelly 32%
Bob Kerrey 60%
Dale Kildee 36%
Jay Kim 45%
Gerald Kleczka 41%
Ronald Klink 32%
Scott Klug 100%
Joseph Knollenberg 45%
Herb Kohl 56%
James Kolbe 55%
Jon Kyl 44%
John LaFalce 48%
Ray LaHood 41%
Tom Lantos 27%
Stephen Largent 62%
Steve LaTourette 41%
Greg Laughlin 59%
Frank Lautenberg 48%
Rick Lazio 59%
James Leach 59%
Jerry Lewis 45%
Ron Lewis 45%
Joe Lieberman 32%
Jim Lightfoot 45%
Blanche Lincoln 57%
John Linder 45%
William Lipinski 41%
Robert Livingston 45%
James Longley, Jr. 59%
Trent Lott, Sr. 44%
Dick Lugar 52%
William Luther 68%
Connie Mack 44%
Thomas Manton 5%
Don Manzullo 50%
Matthew Martinez 40%
Bill Martini 59%
Frank Mascara 36%
Robert Matsui 27%
Karen McCarthy 59%
Bill McCollum 45%
James McCrery III 45%
Joseph McDade 45%
Paul McHale 59%
John McHugh 41%
Scott McInnis 55%
David McIntosh 55%
Cynthia Ann McKinney 26%
Michael McNulty 60%
Martin Meehan 64%
Carrie Meek 27%
Jack Metcalf 50%
Jan Meyers 55%
Dan Miller 59%
David Minge 73%
Patsy Takemoto Mink 32%
John Moakley 18%
Susan Molinari 50%
Alan Mollohan 18%
G.V. Montgomery 68%
Carlos Moorhead 45%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top