Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Concord Coalition

2000 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Joseph Maxwell Cleland 27%
Robert Clement 20%
Howard Coble 27%
Michael Collins 45%
Larry Combest 31%
Gary Condit 29%
Kent Conrad 22%
John Cooksey 23%
Jerry Costello 28%
Christopher Cox 58%
William Coyne 36%
Larry Craig 32%
Robert Cramer 10%
Philip Crane 63%
Barbara Cubin 28%
Randall Cunningham 23%
Thomas Daschle 38%
James Davis 45%
Thomas Davis III 28%
Bill Delahunt 43%
Thomas DeLay 50%
James DeMint 47%
Peter Deutsch 25%
Lincoln Diaz-Balart 17%
Norm Dicks 41%
John Dingell 33%
Chris Dodd 38%
Pete Domenici, Jr. 35%
Calvin Dooley 21%
John Doolittle 19%
Byron Dorgan 22%
David Dreier 30%
Jennifer Dunn 35%
John Edwards 43%
Chet Edwards 40%
Vern Ehlers 28%
Bob Ehrlich, Jr. 39%
Jo Ann Emerson 27%
Philip English 25%
Bob Etheridge 20%
Lane Evans 32%
Terry Everett 20%
Russ Feingold 63%
Bob Filner 42%
Peter Fitzgerald 34%
Ernest Fletcher 16%
Mark Foley 33%
Harold Ford, Jr. 28%
Vito Fossella, Jr. 43%
Barney Frank 45%
William Frist 34%
Jonas Frost III 33%
Elton Gallegly 21%
John Ganske 38%
George Gekas 31%
Richard Andrew Gephardt 21%
Jim Gibbons 32%
Wayne Gilchrest 16%
Paul Gillmor 24%
Benjamin Gilman 17%
Charlie Gonzalez 35%
Virgil Goode, Jr. 39%
Bart Gordon 10%
Porter Goss 36%
Daniel Graham 50%
William Phillip Gramm 49%
Mark Green 42%
James Greenwood 22%
Judd Gregg 49%
Gilbert Gutknecht 42%
Charles Hagel 24%
Ralph Hall 42%
Tony Hall 44%
James Hansen 24%
Tom Harkin 31%
Doc Hastings 25%
Robert Hayes 24%
J.D. Hayworth, Jr. 52%
Joel Hefley 53%
Jesse Helms 24%
Wally Herger, Jr. 49%
Baron Hill 57%
Van Hilleary 26%
Earl Hilliard, Sr. 25%
Maurice Hinchey 46%
David Lee Hobson 22%
Joseph Hoeffel 29%
Pete Hoekstra 51%
Thomas Holden 48%
Ernest Hollings 29%
Rush Holt, Jr. 32%
Darlene Hooley 15%
Stephen Horn 21%
John Nathan Hostettler 55%
Amory Houghton, Jr. 36%
Kenny Hulshof 43%
Duncan Hunter 28%
Y. Tim Hutchinson 15%
Kay Hutchison 20%
Henry Hyde 27%
Daniel Inouye 35%
Ernest Istook, Jr. 15%
Jesse Jackson, Jr. 42%
William Jefferson 32%
James Merrill Jeffords 21%
William Lewis Jenkins 27%
Christopher John 18%
Nancy Johnson 21%
Timothy Johnson 22%
Paul Kanjorski 33%
Sue Kelly 19%
Edward Kennedy, Sr. 39%
Patrick Kennedy 32%
Dale Kildee 29%
Carolyn Kilpatrick 40%
Jack Kingston 40%
Gerald Kleczka 49%
Joseph Knollenberg 17%
Herb Kohl 33%
James Kolbe 31%
Dennis Kucinich 35%
Jon Kyl 34%
John LaFalce 39%
Ray LaHood 42%
Nicholas Lampson 20%
Mary Landrieu 23%
Tom Lantos 30%
Stephen Largent 56%
Tom Latham 32%
Steve LaTourette 29%
James Leach 20%
Carl Levin 35%
Jerry Lewis 21%
Ron Lewis 15%
Joe Lieberman 41%
Blanche Lincoln 27%
John Linder 32%
William Lipinski 26%
Trent Lott, Sr. 20%
Ken Lucas 24%
Dick Lugar 22%
William Luther 64%
James Maloney 8%
Don Manzullo 46%
Frank Mascara 28%
Robert Matsui 34%
Carolyn McCarthy 10%
Karen McCarthy 38%
James McCrery III 10%
John McHugh 21%
Mike McIntyre 27%
Buck McKeon 24%
Cynthia Ann McKinney 38%
Michael McNulty 26%
Martin Meehan 66%
Carrie Meek 35%
Juanita Millender-McDonald 36%
Dan Miller 41%
Gary Miller 41%
George Miller 57%
Patsy Takemoto Mink 26%
John Moakley 41%
Alan Mollohan 21%
Dennis Moore 23%
Jim Moran, Jr. 36%
Constance Morella 42%
Frank Murkowski 20%
Jack Murtha 33%
Sue Myrick 44%
George Nethercutt, Jr. 37%
Robert William Ney 20%
Don Nickles 49%
Anne Northup 22%
Charles Norwood, Jr. 45%
James Nussle 33%
Jim Oberstar 39%
Dave Obey 45%
John Olver 43%
Solomon Ortiz, Sr. 38%
Doug Ose 18%
Major Owens 45%
Michael Oxley 27%
Ed Pastor 40%
Ron Paul 57%
Donald Payne 38%
John Peterson 32%
Tom Petri 40%
David Phelps 36%
Charles Pickering, Jr. 40%
Richard Pombo 31%
Earl Pomeroy 40%
Deborah Pryce 37%
Jack Quinn 9%
George Radanovich 39%
Nick Rahall II 20%
James Ramstad 48%
Ralph Regula 25%
Silvestre Reyes 35%
Thomas Reynolds 23%
Bob Riley 33%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top