Rating Group: Virginia Christian Coalition

1999 Positions

Issues: Conservative
State Office Name Party Rating
VA U.S. House-4 Randy Forbes R 100%
VA U.S. House-9 Morgan Griffith R 77%
VA State House-1 Terry Kilgore R 69%
VA State House-13 Bob Marshall R 92%
VA State House-22 Kathy Byron R 92%
VA State House-25 Steve Landes R 85%
VA State House-28 William Howell R 92%
VA State House-36 Ken Plum D 0%
VA State House-39 Vivian Watts D 8%
VA State House-42 David Albo R 62%
VA State House-54 Bobby Orrock, Sr. R 62%
VA State House-62 Riley Ingram R 85%
VA State House-65 Lee Ware, Jr. R 100%
VA State House-66 Kirk Cox R 100%
VA State House-76 Chris Jones R 100%
VA State House-77 Lionell Spruill, Sr. D 0%
VA State House-79 Johnny Joannou D 38%
VA State Senate-3 Thomas Norment, Jr. R 80%
VA State Senate-7 Frank Wagner R 77%
VA State Senate-9 Aston McEachin D 46%
VA State Senate-10 John Watkins R 58%
VA State Senate-11 Stephen Martin R 100%
VA State Senate-12 Walter Stosch R 100%
VA State Senate-13 Richard Hayden Black R 92%
VA State Senate-15 Frank Ruff, Jr. R 92%
VA State Senate-18 Louise Lucas D 13%
VA State Senate-21 John Edwards D 13%
VA State Senate-23 Stephen Newman R 93%
VA State Senate-24 Emmett Hanger, Jr. R 100%
VA State Senate-25 Creigh Deeds D 23%
VA State Senate-29 Charles Colgan, Sr. D 47%
VA State Senate-32 Janet Howell D 7%
VA State Senate-35 Dick Saslaw D 14%
VA State Senate-36 Toddy Puller D 15%
VA Justice of the Supreme Court Bill Mims 83%
VA Mayor-At-Large Dwight Jones D 31%
Watkins Abbitt, Jr. 38%
James Frederick Almand 0%
Ward Armstrong 31%
Thomas Graham Baker, Jr. 67%
William Barlow 23%
Warren Barry 71%
Viola Osborne Baskerville 0%
Irving Vincent Behm, Jr. 31%
William Welden Bennett, Jr. 31%
Harry Blevins 69%
Robert Bloxom 23%
Bill Bolling 100%
Robert Brink 0%
L. Bryant, Jr. 92%
Vince Callahan, Jr. 54%
Eric Cantor 92%
John Chichester 64%
Mary Taylor Christian 8%
Whittington Whiteside Clement 23%
J. Paul Councill, Jr. 25%
Emily Couric 20%
Charles Cranwell 8%
Flora Davis Crittenden 8%
Glenn Croshaw 23%
L. Karen Darner 0%
Butch Davies III 46%
Jo Ann Davis 100%
Barnie Day 31%
Jay Wayne DeBoer 23%
Jeannemarie Devolites Davis 69%
Alan Arnold Diamonstein 23%
Vivian Earl Dickinson 38%
James Hardy Dillard II 8%
Thelma Drake 85%
Allen Wayne Dudley 77%
Joseph Gartlan, Jr. 27%
George Wallace Grayson 23%
Andy Guest, Jr. 58%
Franklin Hall 17%
Phillip Hamilton 62%
Frank Hargrove, Sr. 67%
Paul Clinton Harris, Sr. 92%
Charles Hawkins 80%
Richard Joyner Holland 36%
Edd Houck 27%
Robert Hull 8%
Thomas Micajah Jackson, Jr. 38%
Joseph Johnson, Jr. 62%
Jerrauld Corey Jones 0%
Jay Kenneth Katzen 92%
Gladys Brown Keating 25%
Benjamin Joseph Lambert III 20%
Henry Marsh III 7%
Madison Ellis Marye 13%
W. Henry Maxwell 29%
Joe May 85%
Roger John McClure 92%
Bob McDonnell 92%
Michéle McQuigg 92%
Kenneth Melvin 25%
Kevin Grey Miller 93%
Yvonne Miller 21%
Brian Moran 15%
Harvey Morgan 58%
Thomas Warren Moss, Jr. 0%
William Tayloe Murphy, Jr. 27%
Samuel Nixon, Jr. 100%
Harry Parrish 67%
Clarence Phillips 31%
Harry Potts, Jr. 57%
Phillip Puckett 33%
Bob Purkey 67%
Lacey Putney 83%
Frederick Quayle 60%
John Spence Reid 85%
William Reynolds 43%
Anne Gregory Rhodes 22%
William Peters Robinson, Jr. 23%
John Adams Rollison III 67%
John Howson Rust, Jr. 67%
Edward Schrock 93%
James Scott 0%
Beverly Sherwood 77%
James Shuler 15%
Kenneth Stolle 93%
Jackie Thomas Stump 42%
Robert Tata 58%
John Harvey Tate, Jr. 31%
Alfred Victor Thomas 50%
Patricia Ticer 0%
Malfourd Trumbo 47%
Marian Amelia Van Landingham 0%
Mitchell Van Yahres 8%
Stanley Clay Walker 20%
William Wampler, Jr. 73%
Leo Wardrup, Jr. 91%
Glenn Weatherholtz 92%
S. Vance Wilkins, Jr. 92%
Donald Williams 23%
Clifton Alexander Woodrum 8%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.