or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Americans for Prosperity - Kansas Chapter

1996 Positions on Conservative Issues

Issues: Conservative
State Office District Name Party Rating
KS State House 6 Jene Vickrey Republican 99%
KS State House 35 Broderick Henderson Democratic 0%
KS State House 44 Barbara Ballard Democratic 22%
KS State House 45 Thomas Sloan Republican 62%
KS State House 63 Jerry Henry Democratic 11%
KS State House 95 Tom Sawyer Democratic 21%
KS State House 102 Janice Pauls Democratic 44%
KS State House 112 John Edmonds Republican 100%
KS State Senate 4 David Haley Democratic 44%
KS State Senate 19 Anthony Hensley Democratic 44%
KS State Senate 27 Les Donovan, Sr. Republican 110%
KS State Senate 30 Susan Wagle Republican 110%
KS Insurance Commissioner Sandy Praeger Republican 22%
KS Secretary of Revenue Nick Jordan Republican 56%
KS Secretary of Wildlife and Parks Robin Jennison Republican 99%
KS State Board of Education 6 Deena Horst Republican 77%
David Adkins 43%
Richard Alldritt 32%
Barbara Allen 44%
Clay Aurand 110%
John Dennis Ballou 110%
Carol Edward Beggs 66%
Lisa Benlon 33%
Richard Bond 33%
Garry Boston 67%
Thomas Scott Bradley 88%
Tim Carmody 89%
Stan Clark 89%
Mary Compton 89%
David Corbin 56%
Vernon Correll 22%
Ray Cox 62%
George Dean 22%
Herman Dillon 43%
Christine Downey 33%
Tim Emert 33%
Cindy Empson 56%
Mike Farmer 110%
Paul Feleciano, Jr. 44%
Bill Feuerborn 33%
Troy Findley 33%
Geraldine Flaharty 11%
Vaughn Flora 33%
Joann Flower 78%
Cliff Franklin 100%
Joann Lee Freeborn 89%
Jim Garner 33%
Gerald Geringer 88%
Ruby Gilbert 11%
Phyllis Lee Gilmore 89%
Kent Glasscock 43%
U. L. Gooch 44%
Greta Goodwin 22%
Janice Hardenburger 89%
Nancey Harrington 78%
Michael Harris 100%
Gary Hayzlett 78%
Henry Helgerson, Jr. 43%
Carl Holmes 89%
Andrew Howell 88%
Joe Humerickhouse 98%
Becky Hutchins 89%
Sherman Jones 11%
Gerald Lee Karr 44%
Joe Kejr 89%
Dave Kerr 56%
Nancy Allison Kirk 33%
Phill Kline 33%
Robert Krehbiel 11%
Brenda Landwehr 78%
Al Lane 50%
Audrey Hansen Langworthy 33%
Bruce Larkin 11%
Barbara Lawrence 56%
Janis Lee 56%
Steven Wayne Lloyd 67%
Jim Long 43%
William Mason 110%
Carlos Mayans 75%
Doug Mays 88%
Laura Lee McClure 22%
Ed McKechnie 33%
Dennis McKinney 43%
Melvin Minor 44%
Gayle Mollenkamp 89%
Stephen Morris 78%
James Morrison 100%
Don Myers 78%
Melvin Neufeld 89%
Rocky Nichols 44%
Kay O'Connor 88%
Lana Oleen 22%
Michael O'Neal 71%
Greg Packer 88%
Marge Petty 44%
Joann Pottorff 88%
Anthony Powell 110%
Ted Powers 67%
Terry Presta 100%
Edward Pugh 78%
Pat Ranson 56%
William Reardon 11%
Richard Reinhardt 22%
L. Candy Ruff 22%
Alicia Salisbury 78%
Don Sallee 78%
Ellen Banmar Samuelson 56%
Tim Shallenburger 88%
Eugene Shore 89%
Doug Spangler 29%
Don Steffes 44%
Dale Swenson 77%
Ralph Tanner 89%
Daniel Thimesch 44%
Dixie Toelkes 32%
Robert Marky Tomlinson 22%
John Toplikar 110%
Ben Vidricksen 56%
Sharon Jean Weber 89%
Galen Weiland 33%
Jonathan Wells 11%
Gwen Welshimer 33%
Jack Wempe 22%
Kenny Wilk 32%
Dennis Wilson 63%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top