Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Delaware State Education Association

1997 Positions

Issues: Education
State Office District Name Party Rating
DE State House 3 Helene Keeley Democratic 75%
DE State House 12 Deborah Hudson Republican 83%
DE State Senate 1 Harris McDowell III Democratic 100%
DE State Senate 2 Margaret Henry Democratic 100%
DE State Senate 3 Robert Marshall Democratic 100%
DE State Senate 7 Patti Blevins Democratic 100%
DE State Senate 8 David Sokola Democratic 100%
DE State Senate 13 David McBride Democratic 81%
DE State Senate 14 Bruce Ennis Democratic 91%
DE State Senate 16 Colin Bonini Republican 54%
DE State Senate 21 Robert Venables, Sr. Democratic 100%
Thurman Adams, Jr. 100%
Steven Amick 81%
Myrna Bair 72%
Oakley Banning, Jr. 100%
Timothy Boulden 83%
David Brady 91%
Gerald Allen Buckworth 100%
George Bunting, Jr. 100%
V. George Carey 91%
G. Wallace Caulk, Jr. 75%
Philip Cloutier 100%
Robert Connor 77%
Nancy Cook 100%
Richard Davis 100%
Richard DiLiberto, Jr. 91%
Joseph Di Pinto 91%
David Ennis 100%
J. Benjamin Ewing, Jr. 100%
Evelyn Fallon 100%
Robert Gilligan 91%
Richard Hauge 72%
William Houghton 91%
Clifford Lee 100%
Vincent Lofink 91%
Jeffrey Mack 100%
Pamela Maier 83%
Jane Perkins Maroney 91%
William Oberle, Jr. 100%
Joseph Petrilli 91%
Al Plant, Sr. 83%
Shirley Price 91%
George Robert Quillen 100%
Donna Reed 63%
Bruce Reynolds 100%
Roger Roy 91%
John Schroeder 91%
Arthur Scott 83%
Thomas Sharp 81%
Wayne Smith 100%
Liane Sorenson 72%
Terry Spence 100%
John Still III 63%
Donna Stone 100%
Stephanie Ulbrich 91%
John Van Sant III 100%
James Vaughn 90%
Robert Voshell 100%
Nancy Hughes Wagner 100%
Charles Welch III 100%
Charles West 83%
Dennis Williams 75%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top