Rating Group: Missouri Family Network

1996 Positions

State Office Name Party Rating
MO U.S. House-1 Lacy Clay, Jr. D 30%
MO U.S. House-4 Vicky Hartzler R 100%
MO U.S. House-6 Sam Graves R 85%
MO Lieutenant Governor Peter Kinder R 100%
MO Commissioner-At-Large John Griesheimer R 84%
Todd Akin Other 100%
Bill Alter Other 100%
Ron Auer Other 44%
Gracia Yancey Backer Other 44%
Lana Ladd Baker Other 48%
Charlie Ballard Other 100%
Rex Barnett Other 100%
Joan Barry Other 80%
Linda Bartelsmeyer Other 100%
Jon Bennett Other 100%
Roseann Bentley Other 80%
Mary Groves Bland Other 32%
Matt Boatright Other 100%
Dennis James Bonner Other 68%
Bill Boucher Other 52%
Joan Bray Other 28%
Gary Burton Other 100%
Paula Carter Other 28%
Harold Caskey Other 85%
Norma Champion Other 100%
Doyle Childers Other 100%
Rich Chrismer Other 100%
Connie Cierpiot Other 100%
Robert Morrison Clayton III Other 32%
Wayne Crump Other 52%
Dorathea Davis Other 24%
Rita Heard Days Other 28%
Ronnie DePasco Other 60%
Patrick Dougherty Other 52%
Steven Ehlmann Other 100%
T. Mark Elliott Other 100%
Catherine Enz Other 100%
Brent Evans Other 100%
Ted Farnen Other 60%
Rodger Fitzwater Other 40%
Francis Flotron, Jr. Other 100%
James Michael Foley Other 72%
Louis Ford Other 36%
Bill Foster Other 100%
Richard Franklin Other 52%
James Froelker Other 100%
Sam Gaskill Other 100%
Steve Gaw Other 48%
Michael Gibbons Other 100%
Wayne Goode Other 60%
James Graham Other 92%
William Gratz Other 68%
Timothy Green Other 52%
Charles Gross Other 100%
Russell Gunn Other 28%
Mary Hagan-Harrell Other 40%
Timothy Cochran Harlan Other 20%
Edwin Hartzler Other 96%
Daniel Jay Hegeman Other 100%
Carl Hendrickson Other 100%
John Hickey Other 48%
Martin Hohulin Other 100%
Thomas Hoppe Other 68%
William Craig Hosmer Other 56%
Ted Clint House Other 90%
Jerry Howard Other 60%
James Howerton Other 100%
Kenneth Jacob Other 24%
Sidney Johnson Other 60%
Mary Kasten Other 100%
Patrick Kelley Other 100%
Glenda Kelly Other 36%
William Patrick Kenney Other 100%
Don Kissell Other 76%
David Klarich Other 100%
Don Koller Other 60%
Jim Kreider Other 60%
Scott Lakin Other 48%
Sam Dean Leake Other 60%
Kenneth Legan Other 100%
David Levin Other 100%
topher A. Liese Other 72%
William Carl Linton Other 100%
Don Lograsso Other 100%
Beth Long Other 100%
John William Loudon Other 100%
William Luetkenhaus Other 88%
Gary Marble Other 100%
James Mathewson Other 60%
Joseph Maxwell Other 65%
Brian May Other 48%
Carol Jean Mays Other 40%
Jerry McBride Other 56%
Emmy Lou McClelland Other 76%
Steve Paul McLuckie Other 32%
Ralph Monaco II Other 70%
Walter Mueller, Jr. Other 90%
Jim Murphy Other 100%
Dana Murray Other 56%
Patrick Naeger Other 100%
Charles Nordwald Other 84%
Patrick O'Connor Other 56%
Cindy Ostmann Other 72%
James O'Toole Other 60%
Francis Overschmidt Other 72%
Fredrick Pouche Other 100%
Charles Pryor Other 100%
Edward Quick Other 55%
Randall Relford Other 48%
David Lawrence Reynolds Other 44%
Mark Richardson Other 100%
Luann Ridgeway Other 100%
Henry Rizzo Other 64%
Estel Boyd Robirds Other 100%
Larry Rohrbach Other 100%
Carson Ross Other 100%
John Russell Other 100%
Mary Lou Sallee Other 100%
May Scheve Other 44%
Mike Schilling Other 36%
John Durbin Schneider Other 55%
David Schwab Other 100%
Delbert Scott Other 100%
John Scott Other 35%
Patricia Secrest Other 100%
O.L. Shelton Other 32%
Charles Shields Other 88%
Betty Sims Other 70%
Marvin Singleton Other 100%
Bill Skaggs Other 44%
Philip Smith Other 52%
Danny Staples Other 60%
Stephen Stoll Other 60%
Donald William Summers Other 100%
Chuck Surface Other 100%
Joseph Treadway Other 64%
Charles Quincy Troupe Other 32%
Tim Van Zandt Other 32%
Carl Vogel Other 100%
Morris Westfall Other 100%
Gary Wiggins Other 48%
Harry Wiggins Other 65%
Deleta Williams Other 52%
Marilyn Taylor Williams Other 56%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.