or Login to see your representatives.

Access Candidates' and Representatives' Biographies, Voting Records, Interest Group Ratings, Issue Positions, Public Statements, and Campaign Finances

Simply enter your zip code above to get to all of your candidates and representatives, or enter a name. Then, just click on the person you are interested in, and you can navigate to the categories of information we track for them.

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Missouri Family Network

1995 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
MO U.S. House 1 Lacy Clay, Jr. Democratic 12%
MO U.S. House 4 Vicky Hartzler Republican 100%
MO U.S. House 6 Sam Graves Republican 100%
MO Lieutenant Governor Peter Kinder Republican 96%
MO Commissioner At-Large John Griesheimer Republican 90%
Todd Akin 100%
Bill Alter 100%
Ron Auer 40%
Gracia Yancey Backer 46%
Lana Ladd Baker 40%
Charlie Ballard 100%
Rex Barnett 100%
Linda Bartelsmeyer 100%
Jon Bennett 100%
Roseann Bentley 52%
Mary Groves Bland 10%
Matt Boatright 100%
Dennis James Bonner 80%
Bill Boucher 46%
Joan Bray 16%
Gary Burton 100%
Paula Carter 25%
Harold Caskey 72%
Norma Champion 100%
Doyle Childers 100%
Rich Chrismer 100%
Connie Cierpiot 100%
Robert Morrison Clayton III 25%
Wayne Crump 50%
Dorathea Davis 29%
Rita Heard Days 10%
Ronnie DePasco 44%
Patrick Dougherty 37%
Steven Ehlmann 100%
T. Mark Elliott 87%
Catherine Enz 100%
Brent Evans 100%
Ted Farnen 57%
Rodger Fitzwater 30%
Francis Flotron, Jr. 100%
James Michael Foley 65%
Louis Ford 36%
Bill Foster 100%
Richard Franklin 45%
James Froelker 100%
Sam Gaskill 95%
Steve Gaw 42%
Michael Gibbons 75%
Wayne Goode 12%
James Graham 100%
William Gratz 70%
Timothy Green 42%
Charles Gross 100%
Russell Gunn 21%
Mary Hagan-Harrell 35%
Timothy Cochran Harlan 10%
Edwin Hartzler 95%
Daniel Jay Hegeman 100%
Carl Hendrickson 90%
John Hickey 54%
Martin Hohulin 100%
Thomas Hoppe 64%
William Craig Hosmer 40%
Ted Clint House 68%
Jerry Howard 48%
James Howerton 100%
Kenneth Jacob 11%
Sidney Johnson 48%
Mary Kasten 100%
Patrick Kelley 100%
Glenda Kelly 30%
William Patrick Kenney 100%
Don Kissell 70%
David Klarich 100%
Don Koller 53%
Jim Kreider 45%
Scott Lakin 50%
Sam Dean Leake 70%
Kenneth Legan 100%
David Levin 100%
topher A. Liese 65%
William Carl Linton 100%
Don Lograsso 100%
Beth Long 100%
John William Loudon 100%
William Luetkenhaus 70%
Gary Marble 100%
James Mathewson 28%
Joseph Maxwell 60%
Brian May 40%
Carol Jean Mays 30%
Jerry McBride 46%
Emmy Lou McClelland 67%
Steve Paul McLuckie 30%
Walter Mueller, Jr. 44%
Jim Murphy 95%
Dana Murray 49%
Patrick Naeger 100%
Charles Nordwald 98%
Patrick O'Connor 60%
Cindy Ostmann 66%
James O'Toole 55%
Francis Overschmidt 75%
Fredrick Pouche 100%
Chuck Pryor 100%
Edward Quick 20%
David Lawrence Reynolds 50%
Mark Richardson 100%
Luann Ridgeway 85%
Henry Rizzo 55%
Estel Boyd Robirds 100%
Larry Rohrbach 100%
Carson Ross 95%
John Russell 100%
Mary Lou Sallee 100%
May Scheve 30%
Mike Schilling 45%
John Durbin Schneider 60%
David Schwab 100%
Delbert Scott 100%
John Scott 52%
Patricia Secrest 99%
O.L. Shelton 10%
Charles Shields 66%
Betty Sims 40%
Marvin Singleton 92%
Bill Skaggs 50%
Philip Smith 60%
Danny Staples 52%
Stephen Stoll 75%
Donald William Summers 100%
Chuck Surface 100%
Joseph Treadway 65%
Charles Quincy Troupe 32%
Tim Van Zandt 16%
Carl Vogel 80%
Morris Westfall 100%
Gary Wiggins 55%
Harry Wiggins 52%
Deleta Williams 40%
Marilyn Taylor Williams 46%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Back to top