Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: United States Chamber of Commerce

2004 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Neil Abercrombie 32%
Gary Ackerman 41%
Daniel Akaka, Sr. 29%
Todd Akin 95%
Rodney Alexander 70%
Wayne Allard 94%
George Allen 100%
Thomas Allen 38%
Rob Andrews 24%
Joe Baca, Sr. 43%
Spencer Bachus 100%
Brian Baird 53%
Richard Hugh Baker 100%
J. Gresham Barrett 100%
Roscoe Bartlett 90%
Charlie Bass 86%
Max Baucus 71%
Evan Bayh 65%
Bob Beauprez 100%
Bob Bennett 100%
Shelley Berkley 60%
Howard Berman 29%
Marion Berry 45%
Judy Biggert 100%
Michael Bilirakis 100%
Jeff Bingaman 71%
Tim Bishop 48%
Sherwood Boehlert 84%
Kit Bond 100%
Henry Bonilla 100%
Jo Bonner, Jr. 100%
Mary Bono Mack 100%
Leonard Boswell 55%
Rick Boucher 67%
Allen Boyd, Jr. 75%
Henry Brown, Jr. 100%
Ginny Brown-Waite 100%
Jim Bunning 100%
Conrad Burns 100%
Dan Burton 95%
Steve Buyer 100%
Robert Byrd 38%
Dave Camp 100%
Chris Cannon 100%
Eric Cantor 100%
Dennis Cardoza 65%
Julia Carson 29%
Edward Case 50%
Mike Castle 85%
Lincoln Chafee 82%
Saxby Chambliss 93%
Ben Chandler III 55%
Chris Chocola 100%
Hillary Clinton 50%
Howard Coble 95%
Norm Coleman 100%
Kent Conrad 53%
Jon Corzine 47%
Jerry Costello 38%
Christopher Cox 95%
Larry Craig 88%
Robert Cramer 86%
Barbara Cubin 100%
Randall Cunningham 100%
Artur Davis 71%
James Davis 48%
Jo Ann Davis 90%
Lincoln Davis 86%
Thomas Davis III 100%
Bill Delahunt 33%
Thomas DeLay 100%
James DeMint 92%
Lincoln Diaz-Balart 84%
Norm Dicks 48%
John Dingell 33%
Chris Dodd 41%
Elizabeth Dole 100%
Pete Domenici, Jr. 100%
John Doolittle 90%
Byron Dorgan 50%
David Dreier 100%
Chet Edwards 81%
Vern Ehlers 100%
Jo Ann Emerson 86%
Philip English 90%
John Ensign 75%
Bob Etheridge 52%
Lane Evans 38%
Terry Everett 100%
Tom Feeney 100%
Russ Feingold 35%
Michael Ferguson 95%
Bob Filner 22%
Mark Foley 100%
Harold Ford, Jr. 55%
Vito Fossella, Jr. 90%
Barney Frank 20%
William Frist 100%
Elton Gallegly 100%
Jim Gerlach 100%
Jim Gibbons 95%
Wayne Gilchrest 95%
Paul Gillmor 100%
Phil Gingrey 100%
Charlie Gonzalez 62%
Virgil Goode, Jr. 90%
Bart Gordon 75%
Mark Green 86%
Judd Gregg 88%
Gilbert Gutknecht 90%
Charles Hagel 93%
Ralph Hall 100%
Tom Harkin 59%
Jane Harman 55%
Katherine Harris 100%
Melissa Hart 100%
J. Dennis Hastert 100%
Doc Hastings 100%
Robert Hayes 95%
J.D. Hayworth, Jr. 100%
Joel Hefley 90%
Wally Herger, Jr. 100%
Stephanie Herseth Sandlin 50%
Maurice Hinchey 25%
David Lee Hobson 100%
Pete Hoekstra 95%
Thomas Holden 67%
Rush Holt, Jr. 19%
Darlene Hooley 60%
John Nathan Hostettler 81%
Kenny Hulshof 100%
Duncan Hunter 95%
Kay Hutchison 94%
Henry Hyde 95%
Daniel Inouye 50%
Ernest Istook, Jr. 94%
Jesse Jackson, Jr. 14%
William Jefferson 57%
James Merrill Jeffords 59%
William Lewis Jenkins 95%
Nancy Johnson 100%
Tim Johnson 86%
Timothy Johnson 59%
Paul Kanjorski 30%
Ric Keller 100%
Sue Kelly 86%
Edward Kennedy, Sr. 31%
Mark Kennedy 100%
Patrick Kennedy 40%
Dale Kildee 38%
Carolyn Kilpatrick 29%
Jack Kingston 100%
Joseph Knollenberg 100%
Herb Kohl 44%
James Kolbe 100%
Dennis Kucinich 6%
Jon Kyl 88%
Ray LaHood 85%
Mary Landrieu 71%
Tom Lantos 37%
Tom Latham 100%
Steve LaTourette 86%
Frank Lautenberg 38%
James Leach 94%
Carl Levin 41%
Jerry Lewis 100%
Ron Lewis 95%
Joe Lieberman 79%
Blanche Lincoln 71%
John Linder 100%
Trent Lott, Sr. 100%
Dick Lugar 100%
Don Manzullo 100%
Jim Marshall 55%
Jim Matheson 86%
Carolyn McCarthy 45%
Thaddeus McCotter 95%
James McCrery III 100%
John McHugh 90%
Mike McIntyre 60%
Buck McKeon 100%
Michael McNulty 33%
Martin Meehan 22%
Kendrick Meek, Sr. 45%
Mike Michaud 48%
Juanita Millender-McDonald 35%
Gary Miller 100%
George Miller 21%
Brad Miller 43%
Alan Mollohan 37%
Dennis Moore 62%
Jim Moran, Jr. 67%
Jack Murtha 48%
Marilyn Musgrave 100%
Sue Myrick 95%
Ben Nelson 81%
Robert William Ney 100%
Anne Northup 100%
Charles Norwood, Jr. 100%
James Nussle 95%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top