Search Form
Now choose a category »

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Montana Conservation Voters

2005 Positions

Issues: Environment
State Office District Name Party Rating
MT U.S. Senate Sr Jon Tester Democratic 92%
MT State House 3 Jerry O'Neil Republican 8%
MT State House 96 Carolyn Squires Democratic 100%
MT State Senate 2 Dee Brown Republican 25%
MT State Senate 4 Jon Sonju Republican 25%
MT State Senate 5 Verdell Jackson Republican 0%
MT State Senate 6 Janna Taylor Republican 25%
MT State Senate 9 Rick Ripley Republican 17%
MT State Senate 14 Llewelyn Jones Republican 25%
MT State Senate 15 Jim Peterson Republican 25%
MT State Senate 16 Jonathan Windy Boy Democratic 92%
MT State Senate 23 Alan Olson Republican 17%
MT State Senate 26 Robyn Driscoll Democratic 100%
MT State Senate 27 Elsie Arntzen Republican 25%
MT State Senate 28 Jeffrey Essmann Republican 33%
MT State Senate 32 Larry Jent Democratic 92%
MT State Senate 34 Scott Sales Republican 8%
MT State Senate 36 Debby Barrett Republican 17%
MT State Senate 37 Jon Sesso Democratic 92%
MT State Senate 38 Jim Keane Democratic 67%
MT State Senate 40 Mary Caferro Democratic 100%
MT State Senate 41 Christine Kaufmann Democratic 100%
MT State Senate 42 Dave Lewis Republican 25%
MT State Senate 48 Tom Facey Democratic 100%
MT State Senate 49 David Wanzenried Democratic 100%
MT Justice of the Supreme Court Seat 2 Mike Wheat Non-partisan 100%
MT Auditor Monica Lindeen Democratic 75%
MT Budget Director Dan Villa Democratic 100%
MT Council Member Ward 1 Brent Cromley Democratic 100%
MT Public Service Commissioner 3 Roger Koopman Republican 0%
MT Public Service Commission Vice Chair Bob Lake Republican 8%
Joan Andersen 25%
Keith Bales 0%
Joe Balyeat 8%
John Balyeat 8%
Gregory Barkus 8%
Arlene Becker 100%
Bob Bergren 92%
Norma Bixby 100%
Jerry Black 17%
Gary Branae 100%
Roy Brown 17%
John Brueggeman 25%
Edward Butcher 17%
Rosalie Buzzas 100%
Terrence Callahan 100%
Margarett Campbell 100%
Paul Clark 100%
John Cobb 50%
Vicki Cocchiarella 75%
Jill Cohenour 100%
Mike Cooney 100%
Aubyn Curtiss 8%
Sue Dickenson 100%
Tim Dowell 100%
Emelie Kay Eaton 100%
Jon Ellingson 100%
Jim Elliott 83%
John Esp 8%
George Loren Everett 8%
Eve Franklin 100%
Kevin Furey 100%
David Gallik 100%
Steven Gallus 92%
Kathleen Galvin-Halcro 92%
Kelly Gebhardt 17%
Kim Gillan 83%
William Glaser 33%
George Golie 92%
Duane Grimes 8%
Wanda Grinde 100%
George Groesbeck 92%
Gail Gutsche 100%
Robin Hamilton 100%
Kenneth Hansen 100%
Dan Harrington 100%
Christopher Kirk Harris 100%
Ray Hawk 0%
Robert Hawks 100%
Ralph Heinert, Jr. 25%
Gordon Hendrick 25%
Teresa Henry 100%
Dennis Himmelberger 8%
Cynthia Hiner 92%
Hal Jacobson 100%
Joey Jayne 100%
Bill Jones 25%
Mike Jopek 100%
Carol Juneau 100%
Bob Keenan 8%
Sam Kitzenberg 75%
Harry Klock 36%
Richard Laible 25%
Carol Lambert 25%
Michael Lange 25%
Lane Larson 92%
Jesse Laslovich 92%
Ralph Lenhart 92%
Greg Lind 100%
Gary MacLaren 50%
Rick Maedje 17%
Bruce Malcolm 25%
Jeff Mangan 83%
Gary Matthews 75%
Dave McAlpin 100%
Daniel McGee 0%
Tom McGillvray 25%
Joe McKenney 42%
Walter McNutt 25%
Scott Mendenhall 8%
Mike Milburn 33%
Penny Armstrong Morgan 9%
Lynda Moss 100%
John Musgrove 100%
Mark Noennig 58%
Art Noonan 100%
Bernie Olson 33%
John Parker 100%
Gerald Pease 100%
Gary Perry 33%
Holly Raser 100%
Diane Rice 17%
Donald Roberts 42%
John Ross 17%
Glenn Roush 83%
Don Ryan 100%
Trudi Schmidt 92%
Jim Shockley 42%
John Sinrud 8%
Veronica Small-Eastman 100%
Frank Smith 83%
Wayne Stahl 42%
Corey Stapleton 27%
Donald Steinbeisser 0%
Ronald Stoker 17%
Robert Story, Jr. 8%
Bill Tash 8%
Kenneth Toole, Jr. 100%
Joseph Tropila 100%
Pat Wagman 17%
Karl Waitschies 25%
John Ward 33%
Bill Warden 33%
Dan Weinberg 100%
Jack Wells 17%
Carol Williams 100%
Bill Wilson 92%
Jeanne Windham 100%
Brady Wiseman 100%
John Witt 17%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top