Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: National Federation of Federal Employees

1989-1990 Positions

Issues: Labor Unions
State Office District Name Party Rating
FL U.S. House 27 Ileana Ros-Lehtinen Republican 53%
Toby Roth 15%
William Roth, Jr. 0%
Marge Roukema 44%
Martin Olav Sabo 100%
Paul Sarbanes 100%
Jim Saxton 43%
Daniel Schaefer 21%
Steven Schiff 64%
Pat Schroeder 93%
NY U.S. Senate Sr Chuck Schumer Democratic 86%
WI U.S. House 5 Jim Sensenbrenner, Jr. Republican 0%
NY U.S. House 15 José Serrano Democratic, Working Families 90%
E. Clay Shaw, Jr. 16%
Christopher Shays 43%
AL U.S. Senate Sr Richard Shelby Republican 75%
Paul Simon 88%
Alan Simpson 50%
Norman Sisisky 86%
David Skaggs 100%
Joseph Skeen 43%
Ike Skelton 62%
NY U.S. House 25 Louise Slaughter Democratic 100%
NJ U.S. House 4 Chris Smith Republican 57%
TX U.S. House 21 Lamar Smith Republican 29%
Gerald B.H. Solomon 36%
Arlen Specter 88%
Pete Stark 86%
Cliff Stearns 21%
Charles Stenholm 57%
Ted Stevens 36%
Gerry Studds 93%
Bob Stump 0%
Gene Taylor 43%
Craig Thomas 29%
William Thomas 21%
Strom Thurmond 50%
Esteban Edward Torres 100%
Robert Torricelli 91%
Ed Towns 73%
MI U.S. House 6 Fred Upton Republican 29%
Bruce Vento 93%
IN U.S. House 1 Pete Visclosky Democratic 100%
Harold Volkmer 93%
Barbara Vucanovich 29%
James Walsh 62%
John Warner 63%
Henry Waxman 86%
Pat Williams 71%
Charles Wilson 77%
Bob Wise, Jr. 100%
Frank Wolf 43%
Sidney Yates 85%
Bill Young 43%
AK U.S. House At-Large Don Young Republican 43%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top