Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Americans for Tax Reform

2000 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Robert Clement 40%
Howard Coble 90%
Michael Collins 87.5%
Larry Combest 95%
Gary Condit 50%
Kent Conrad 10%
John Cooksey 90%
Jerry Costello 20%
Christopher Cox 95%
William Coyne 5%
Larry Craig 95%
Robert Cramer 55%
Philip Crane 95%
Barbara Cubin 90%
Randall Cunningham 90%
Thomas Daschle 10%
James Davis 13%
Thomas Davis III 97.5%
Bill Delahunt 7.5%
Thomas DeLay 100%
James DeMint 97.5%
Peter Deutsch 27.5%
Lincoln Diaz-Balart 80%
Norm Dicks 10%
John Dingell 0%
Chris Dodd 10%
Pete Domenici, Jr. 70%
Calvin Dooley 20%
John Doolittle 85%
Byron Dorgan 10%
David Dreier 85%
Jennifer Dunn 87.5%
John Edwards 5%
Chet Edwards 15%
Vern Ehlers 75%
Bob Ehrlich, Jr. 95%
Jo Ann Emerson 75%
Philip English 100%
Bob Etheridge 40%
Lane Evans 5%
Terry Everett 80%
Russ Feingold 15%
Bob Filner 0%
Peter Fitzgerald 95%
Ernest Fletcher 85%
Mark Foley 85%
Harold Ford, Jr. 20%
Vito Fossella, Jr. 97.5%
Barney Frank 7.5%
William Frist 90%
Jonas Frost III 10%
Elton Gallegly 85%
John Ganske 83%
George Gekas 95%
Richard Andrew Gephardt 0%
Jim Gibbons 90%
Wayne Gilchrest 80%
Paul Gillmor 65%
Benjamin Gilman 65%
Charlie Gonzalez 10%
Virgil Goode, Jr. 85%
Bart Gordon 40%
Porter Goss 97.5%
Daniel Graham 15%
William Phillip Gramm 100%
Mark Green 97.5%
James Greenwood 77.5%
Judd Gregg 95%
Charles Hagel 90%
Ralph Hall 85%
Tony Hall 10%
James Hansen 85%
Tom Harkin 10%
J. Dennis Hastert 100%
Doc Hastings 90%
Robert Hayes 75%
J.D. Hayworth, Jr. 95%
Joel Hefley 95%
Jesse Helms 85%
Wally Herger, Jr. 97.5%
Baron Hill 20%
Van Hilleary 87.5%
Earl Hilliard, Jr. 10%
Maurice Hinchey 5%
David Lee Hobson 85%
Joseph Hoeffel 13%
Pete Hoekstra 90%
Thomas Holden 5%
Rush Holt, Jr. 30%
Darlene Hooley 40%
Stephen Horn 85%
John Nathan Hostettler 70%
Amory Houghton, Jr. 63%
Kenny Hulshof 93%
Duncan Hunter 80%
Y. Tim Hutchinson 85%
Kay Hutchison 95%
Henry Hyde 77.5%
Daniel Inouye 10%
Ernest Istook, Jr. 75%
Jesse Jackson, Jr. 0%
William Jefferson 20%
James Merrill Jeffords 55%
William Lewis Jenkins 75%
Christopher John 45%
Nancy Johnson 63%
Timothy Johnson 15%
Paul Kanjorski 5%
Sue Kelly 95%
Edward Kennedy, Sr. 10%
Patrick Kennedy 0%
Dale Kildee 3%
Carolyn Kilpatrick 5%
Jack Kingston 80%
Gerald Kleczka 13%
Joseph Knollenberg 87.5%
Herb Kohl 25%
James Kolbe 93%
Dennis Kucinich 5%
Jon Kyl 100%
John LaFalce 13%
Ray LaHood 90%
Nicholas Lampson 15%
Mary Landrieu 20%
Tom Lantos 5%
Stephen Largent 73%
Tom Latham 85%
Steve LaTourette 73%
James Leach 75%
Carl Levin 10%
Jerry Lewis 80%
Ron Lewis 85%
Joe Lieberman 15%
Blanche Lincoln 15%
John Linder 95%
William Lipinski 33%
Trent Lott, Sr. 95%
Ken Lucas 70%
Dick Lugar 90%
William Luther 25%
James Maloney 57.5%
Don Manzullo 95%
Frank Mascara 10%
Robert Matsui 10%
Carolyn McCarthy 40%
Karen McCarthy 10%
James McCrery III 87.5%
John McHugh 70%
Mike McIntyre 40%
Buck McKeon 90%
Cynthia Ann McKinney 20%
Michael McNulty 10%
Martin Meehan 25%
Carrie Meek 5%
Juanita Millender-McDonald 5%
Dan Miller 100%
Gary Miller 100%
George Miller 7.5%
Zell Bryan Miller 33%
Patsy Takemoto Mink 15%
John Moakley 3%
Alan Mollohan 20%
Dennis Moore 35%
Jim Moran, Jr. 23%
Constance Morella 50%
Frank Murkowski 95%
Jack Murtha 5%
Sue Myrick 95%
George Nethercutt, Jr. 85%
Robert William Ney 75%
Don Nickles 100%
Anne Northup 93%
Charles Norwood, Jr. 80%
James Nussle 85%
Jim Oberstar 0%
Dave Obey 0%
John Olver 7.5%
Solomon Ortiz, Sr. 10%
Doug Ose 85%
Major Owens 5%
Michael Oxley 93%
Ed Pastor 5%
Ron Paul 75%
Donald Payne 5%
John Peterson 90%
Tom Petri 90%
David Phelps 30%
Charles Pickering, Jr. 95%
Richard Pombo 80%
Earl Pomeroy 10%
Deborah Pryce 87.5%
Jack Quinn 75%
George Radanovich 95%
Nick Rahall II 5%
James Ramstad 90%
Ralph Regula 75%
Silvestre Reyes 10%
Thomas Reynolds 90%
Bob Riley 85%
Lynn Nancy Rivers 15%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top