State Office Name Party Rating
MS U.S. House-1 Alan Nunnelee R 100%
MS State House-7 Wanda Jennings R 100%
MS State House-10 H. Nolan Mettetal R 86%
MS State House-16 Steve Holland D 93%
MS State House-27 Ferr Smith D 71%
MS State House-29 Linda Coleman D 64%
MS State House-30 Robert Huddleston D 79%
MS State House-31 Sara Thomas D 60%
MS State House-32 Willie Perkins, Sr. D 71%
MS State House-33 Thomas Reynolds II D 79%
MS State House-38 Tyrone Ellis D 69%
MS State House-39 Jeffrey Smith R 100%
MS State House-42 Reecy Dickson D 64%
MS State House-45 Bennett Malone D 86%
MS State House-46 Bobby Howell R 100%
MS State House-49 Willie Bailey D 79%
MS State House-51 Rufus Straughter D 64%
MS State House-53 Robert Moak D 50%
MS State House-57 Edward Blackmon, Jr. D 71%
MS State House-58 Rita Martinson R 93%
MS State House-60 John Moore R 100%
MS State House-61 Ray Rogers R 93%
MS State House-64 William Denny, Jr. R 100%
MS State House-65 Mary Coleman D 77%
MS State House-67 Earle Banks D 54%
MS State House-69 Alyce Clarke D 64%
MS State House-70 James Evans D 71%
MS State House-79 Blaine Eaton II D 93%
MS State House-85 America Middleton D 77%
MS State House-87 Johnny Stringer D 100%
MS State House-89 C. Shows R 93%
MS State House-90 Joseph Warren D 79%
MS State House-94 Robert Johnson III D 77%
MS State House-98 David Myers D 64%
MS State House-103 Percy Watson D 67%
MS State House-106 Herbert Frierson R 93%
MS State House-108 Mark Formby R 100%
MS State House-112 John Read R 100%
MS State Senate-3 Nickey Browning R 86%
MS State Senate-7 Hob Bryan D 79%
MS State Senate-9 Gray Tollison R 79%
MS State Senate-13 Willie Simmons D 77%
MS State Senate-14 Lydia Chassaniol R 100%
MS State Senate-24 David Jordan D 71%
MS State Senate-26 John Horhn D 79%
MS State Senate-27 Hillman Frazier D 79%
MS State Senate-31 Terry Burton R 93%
MS State Senate-32 Sampson Jackson II D 79%
MS State Senate-50 Tommy Gollott R 93%
MS Supervisor-3 Dirk Dedeaux D 86%
MS Public Service Commissioner Lynn Posey R 79%
Lester Barnett, Jr. 100%
Barbara Martin Blackmon 79%
William Bowles 100%
Billy Broomfield 86%
Thomas Cameron III 93%
William Ward Canon 100%
Charles Wilson Capps, Jr. 93%
Neely Carlton 79%
Robert Clark, Jr. 83%
Joseph Compretta 92%
Scottie Cuevas 79%
Ricky Cummings 77%
Lee Jarrell Davis 100%
Bob Dearing 79%
George Dickerson 79%
James Ellington 100%
Joe Ellzey 100%
Ronald David Farris 92%
George Flaggs, Jr. 86%
Jamie Franks, Jr. 86%
Frances Fredericks 57%
Vernon Delma Furniss 79%
Jack Gadd 92%
David Gibbs 64%
Carl Gordon, Jr. 85%
David Green 57%
Joe Grist, Jr. 86%
Daniel Guice, Jr. 93%
Edwin Glenn Hamilton 100%
Frank Hamilton 93%
Alice Harden 79%
Clayton Henderson 86%
William Hewes III 100%
Tommy Horne 86%
Joe Hudson 86%
Roger Ishee 80%
Michael Janus 100%
Timothy Lamar Johnson 100%
Andrew Ketchings 100%
Ezell Lee 86%
Travis Little 100%
R.L. Livingston 79%
Percy Maples 100%
James Markham, Jr. 90%
Warner McBride 86%
William McCoy 93%
William Miles 93%
Thomas Mitchell 86%
T.O. Moffatt 100%
Keith Norris Montgomery, Sr. 93%
Robert Moody 85%
E. Harvey Moss 86%
Clem Mullins Nettles 93%
Diane Peranich 92%
John Raymond Reeves 100%
Thomas Robertson 100%
Valeria Brower Robertson 100%
Eric Robinson 100%
Walter Robinson, Jr. 69%
Charles Ross 100%
Clinton Rotenberry, Jr. 100%
Vincent Scoper, Jr. 100%
Eloise Hale Scott 93%
James Simpson, Jr. 100%
Charles Smith 100%
Robert Harold Smith 79%
Mary Stevens 86%
Joseph Thomas Stogner 92%
Bobby Taylor 79%
Billy Thames 79%
Jimmy Thornton 71%
Bennie Turner 71%
Tom Wallace 86%
Johnnie Walls, Jr. 83%
Carmen Wells-Smith 93%
Phillip West 80%
John Robert White 86%
Richard White 100%
Tommy Woods 93%
Charles Young, Sr. 93%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.