Rating Group: Sierra Club - John Muir Chapter

2003-2004 Positions

Issues: Environment
State Office Name Party Rating
WI U.S. House-2 Mark Pocan D 100%
WI U.S. House-4 Gwen Moore D 92%
WI State Assembly-1 Garey Bies R 13%
WI State Assembly-3 Alvin Ott R 20%
WI State Assembly-9 Josh Zepnick D 80%
WI State Assembly-16 Leon Young D 87%
WI State Assembly-19 Jon Richards D 100%
WI State Assembly-20 Christine Sinicki D 73%
WI State Assembly-27 Steven Kestell R 13%
WI State Assembly-33 Stephen Nass R 14%
WI State Assembly-55 Dean Kaufert R 20%
WI State Assembly-59 Daniel LeMahieu R 13%
WI State Assembly-61 Samantha Kerkman R 13%
WI State Assembly-70 Amy Vruwink D 60%
WI State Assembly-77 Terese Berceau D 100%
WI State Assembly-80 Sondy Pope D 93%
WI State Assembly-87 Mary Williams R 7%
WI State Senate-1 Frank Lasee R 15%
WI State Senate-2 Robert Cowles R 8%
WI State Senate-3 Timothy Carpenter D 100%
WI State Senate-4 Lena Taylor D 73%
WI State Senate-5 Leah Vukmir R 13%
WI State Senate-8 Alberta Darling R 8%
WI State Senate-9 Joseph Leibham R 8%
WI State Senate-10 Sheila Harsdorf R 8%
WI State Senate-13 Scott Fitzgerald R 8%
WI State Senate-14 Luther Olsen R 13%
WI State Senate-16 Mark Miller D 100%
WI State Senate-17 Dale Schultz R 8%
WI State Senate-19 Michael Ellis R 8%
WI State Senate-20 Glenn Grothman R 13%
WI State Senate-21 John Lehman D 87%
WI State Senate-22 Robert Wirch D 83%
WI State Senate-24 Julie Lassa D 58%
WI State Senate-25 Robert Jauch D 75%
WI State Senate-26 Fred Risser D 100%
WI State Senate-27 Jon Erpenbach D 92%
WI State Senate-28 Mary Lazich R 8%
WI State Senate-29 Jerry Petrowski R 7%
WI State Senate-30 Dave Hansen D 83%
WI State Senate-32 Jennifer Shilling D 83%
WI Supervisor-10 John Ainsworth 13%
WI Supervisor-13 Joe Plouff 92%
WI Public Service Commission Chair Phil Montgomery 20%
WI Railroad Commissioner Jeffrey Plale D 50%
WI Secretary of Transportation Mark Gottlieb R 27%
Sheryl Albers 13%
Larry Balow 57%
Spencer Black 100%
Frank Boyle 87%
Roger Breske 50%
Ron Brown 8%
Charles Chvala 100%
G. Spencer Coggs 83%
Pedro Colon 80%
David Cullen 100%
Russell Decker 91%
Jeff Fitzgerald 13%
Steven Foti 13%
Stephen Freese 20%
Donald Friske 13%
John Gard 14%
Curt Gielow 20%
Barbara Gronemus 14%
Scott Gunderson 13%
Mark Gundrum 15%
Eugene Hahn 13%
Tom Hebl 80%
J.A. Hines 20%
Mark Honadel 8%
Gregory Huber 87%
Mary Hubler 47%
Michael Huebsch 14%
Jean Hundertmark 20%
Scott Richard Jensen 13%
Suzanne Jeskewitz 13%
DuWayne Johnsrud 13%
Theodore Kanavas 8%
Neal Kedzie 8%
Judy Krawczyk 13%
Robin Kreibich 17%
James Kreuser 73%
Shirley Krug 100%
Margaret Krusick 67%
Bonnie Ladwig 13%
Alan Lasee 8%
Michael Lehman 13%
Gabe Loeffelholz 13%
Thomas Lothian 15%
Terri McCormick 14%
Dan Meyer 7%
Mark Meyer 75%
Louis Molepske, Jr. 83%
Johnnie Morris 87%
Terry Musser 13%
Ann Nischke 13%
Carol Owens 13%
Mary Panzer 8%
Mark Pettis 13%
Michael Powers 14%
Tom Reynolds 8%
Kitty Rhoades 13%
Judith Robson 83%
Carol Roessler 8%
Marlin Schneider 93%
Dan Schooff 79%
Lorraine Seratti 14%
Gary Sherman 67%
Tony Staskunas 60%
John Steinbrink 60%
Cathy Stepp 8%
Jeffrey Stone 13%
Scott Suder 7%
Barbara Toles 83%
Debra Towns 13%
John Townsend 13%
David Travis 93%
Robert Turner 87%
Gregg Underheim 13%
Terry Van Akkeren 60%
Karl Van Roy 13%
Daniel Vrakas 13%
David Ward 7%
Sheldon Wasserman 87%
Becky Weber 13%
Robert Welch 0%
Steve Wieckert 13%
Annette Williams 100%
Jeffrey Wood 13%
Wayne Wood 62%
Robert Ziegelbauer 33%
David Zien 8%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.