Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Family Research Council

2005 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Gary Ackerman 0%
Todd Akin 100%
Rodney Alexander 92%
Thomas Allen 0%
Rob Andrews 8%
Joe Baca, Sr. 23%
Brian Baird 15%
Richard Hugh Baker 92%
J. Gresham Barrett 100%
Roscoe Bartlett 100%
Charlie Bass 54%
Melissa Bean 23%
Bob Beauprez 92%
Shelley Berkley 31%
Howard Berman 0%
Marion Berry 69%
Judy Biggert 54%
Michael Bilirakis 92%
Sherwood Boehlert 25%
Henry Bonilla 92%
Jo Bonner, Jr. 92%
Mary Bono Mack 42%
Dan Boren 69%
Leonard Boswell 33%
Rick Boucher 8%
Allen Boyd, Jr. 25%
Henry Brown, Jr. 83%
Ginny Brown-Waite 85%
Dan Burton 100%
Steve Buyer 92%
Chris Cannon 100%
Eric Cantor 92%
Dennis Cardoza 33%
Russ Carnahan 8%
Julia Carson 0%
Edward Case 0%
Mike Castle 23%
Ben Chandler III 54%
Chris Chocola 92%
Jerry Costello 77%
Robert Cramer 46%
Barbara Cubin 100%
Randall Cunningham 83%
Artur Davis 8%
Geoff Davis 92%
James Davis 8%
Jo Ann Davis 100%
Lincoln Davis 85%
Thomas Davis III 62%
Bill Delahunt 8%
Thomas DeLay 100%
Lincoln Diaz-Balart 85%
Norm Dicks 0%
John Doolittle 100%
Thelma Drake 92%
David Dreier 77%
Chet Edwards 31%
Vern Ehlers 77%
Jo Ann Emerson 85%
Philip English 85%
Bob Etheridge 31%
Lane Evans 0%
Terry Everett 92%
Tom Feeney 100%
Michael Ferguson 92%
Bob Filner 8%
Mark Foley 69%
Harold Ford, Jr. 23%
Vito Fossella, Jr. 85%
Barney Frank 0%
Elton Gallegly 100%
Jim Gibbons 92%
Wayne Gilchrest 38%
Paul Gillmor 69%
Charlie Gonzalez 0%
Virgil Goode, Jr. 92%
Bart Gordon 50%
Mark Green 100%
Gilbert Gutknecht 100%
Jane Harman 8%
Katherine Harris 85%
Melissa Hart 92%
J. Dennis Hastert 100%
Robert Hayes 92%
J.D. Hayworth, Jr. 100%
Joel Hefley 100%
Wally Herger, Jr. 92%
Stephanie Herseth Sandlin 31%
Maurice Hinchey 8%
David Lee Hobson 85%
Pete Hoekstra 83%
Thomas Holden 46%
Darlene Hooley 17%
John Nathan Hostettler 100%
Kenny Hulshof 100%
Duncan Hunter 100%
Henry Hyde 83%
Bob Inglis, Sr. 85%
Ernest Istook, Jr. 100%
Jesse Jackson, Jr. 8%
William Jefferson 17%
William Lewis Jenkins 100%
Nancy Johnson 42%
Tim Johnson 92%
Paul Kanjorski 38%
Ric Keller 92%
Sue Kelly 62%
Mark Kennedy 92%
Patrick Kennedy 0%
Dale Kildee 46%
Carolyn Kilpatrick 0%
Joseph Knollenberg 75%
James Kolbe 33%
Dennis Kucinich 0%
John Kuhl, Jr. 100%
Ray LaHood 85%
Tom Lantos 8%
Steve LaTourette 75%
James Leach 38%
Jerry Lewis 69%
Ron Lewis 100%
John Linder 100%
Dan Lungren 92%
Connie Mack IV 92%
Don Manzullo 100%
Jim Marshall 77%
Thaddeus McCotter 85%
James McCrery III 92%
John McHugh 85%
Cynthia Ann McKinney 0%
Michael McNulty 38%
Martin Meehan 0%
Kendrick Meek, Sr. 8%
Charlie Melancon, Sr. 62%
Juanita Millender-McDonald 0%
Brad Miller 0%
Alan Mollohan 69%
Dennis Moore 8%
Jack Murtha 31%
Marilyn Musgrave 100%
Sue Myrick 100%
Robert William Ney 85%
Anne Northup 92%
Charles Norwood, Jr. 100%
James Nussle 92%
Jim Oberstar 31%
Dave Obey 17%
John Olver 0%
Solomon Ortiz, Sr. 42%
Thomas William Osborne 92%
Major Owens 0%
Michael Oxley 75%
Ron Paul 75%
Donald Payne 0%
John Peterson 85%
Charles Pickering, Jr. 92%
Todd Platts 77%
Richard Pombo 100%
Earl Pomeroy 38%
Jon Porter, Sr. 85%
Deborah Pryce 77%
George Radanovich 100%
James Ramstad 69%
Ralph Regula 77%
Denny Rehberg 92%
Richard Renzi 92%
Silvestre Reyes 25%
Thomas Reynolds 75%
Mike Ross 54%
Steve Rothman 0%
Jim Ryun 100%
Martin Olav Sabo 0%
Jim Saxton 85%
Jean Schmidt 100%
John Schwarz 62%
John Shadegg 92%
E. Clay Shaw, Jr. 75%
Christopher Shays 8%
Donald Sherwood 85%
Robert Ruhl Simmons 33%
Ike Skelton 69%
Vic Snyder 15%
Mike Sodrel 92%
Hilda Solis 0%
Mark Souder 92%
John Spratt, Jr. 15%
Pete Stark 0%
Cliff Stearns 92%
Ted Strickland 15%
Bart Stupak 46%
John Sullivan 92%
John Sweeney 75%
Tom Tancredo 92%
John Tanner 46%
Ellen Tauscher 8%
Charles Taylor 92%
Gene Taylor 92%
William Thomas 50%
Todd Tiahrt 92%
Ed Towns 17%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top