Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: The Partnership for the Homeless

2003-2004 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Gary Ackerman 67%
Daniel Akaka, Sr. 100%
Todd Akin 0%
Rodney Alexander 100%
Wayne Allard 100%
George Allen 100%
Thomas Allen 33%
Rob Andrews 100%
Joe Baca, Sr. 100%
Brian Baird 67%
Richard Hugh Baker 0%
J. Gresham Barrett 33%
Roscoe Bartlett 0%
Charlie Bass 33%
Max Baucus 100%
Evan Bayh 100%
Bob Beauprez 33%
Bob Bennett 100%
Shelley Berkley 100%
Howard Berman 100%
Marion Berry 100%
Judy Biggert 33%
Michael Bilirakis 33%
Jeff Bingaman 0%
Sherwood Boehlert 33%
Kit Bond 100%
Henry Bonilla 33%
Jo Bonner, Jr. 33%
Mary Bono Mack 33%
Leonard Boswell 100%
Rick Boucher 100%
Allen Boyd, Jr. 67%
Henry Brown, Jr. 33%
Ginny Brown-Waite 33%
Jim Bunning 100%
Conrad Burns 100%
Dan Burton 33%
Steve Buyer 33%
Robert Byrd 100%
Chris Cannon 0%
Eric Cantor 33%
Dennis Cardoza 100%
Julia Carson 100%
Edward Case 100%
Mike Castle 33%
Chris Chocola 33%
Hillary Clinton 100%
Norm Coleman 100%
Kent Conrad 0%
Jon Corzine 0%
Jerry Costello 67%
Christopher Cox 0%
Larry Craig 100%
Robert Cramer 67%
Barbara Cubin 0%
Randall Cunningham 33%
Artur Davis 100%
James Davis 100%
Jo Ann Davis 33%
Lincoln Davis 100%
Thomas Davis III 33%
Bill Delahunt 33%
Thomas DeLay 33%
James DeMint 33%
Lincoln Diaz-Balart 33%
Norm Dicks 100%
Chris Dodd 0%
Elizabeth Dole 100%
Pete Domenici, Jr. 100%
John Doolittle 33%
Byron Dorgan 100%
David Dreier 33%
Chet Edwards 67%
Vern Ehlers 33%
Jo Ann Emerson 33%
Philip English 33%
John Ensign 100%
Bob Etheridge 67%
Lane Evans 67%
Terry Everett 0%
Tom Feeney 33%
Russ Feingold 0%
Michael Ferguson 0%
Bob Filner 67%
Mark Foley 33%
Harold Ford, Jr. 100%
Vito Fossella, Jr. 33%
Barney Frank 67%
William Frist 100%
Elton Gallegly 33%
Jim Gibbons 0%
Wayne Gilchrest 33%
Paul Gillmor 33%
Charlie Gonzalez 100%
Virgil Goode, Jr. 33%
Bart Gordon 100%
Mark Green 0%
Judd Gregg 100%
Gilbert Gutknecht 0%
Jane Harman 100%
Katherine Harris 33%
Melissa Hart 33%
J. Dennis Hastert 50%
Robert Hayes 33%
J.D. Hayworth, Jr. 33%
Joel Hefley 0%
Wally Herger, Jr. 33%
Maurice Hinchey 67%
David Lee Hobson 33%
Pete Hoekstra 0%
Thomas Holden 67%
Darlene Hooley 100%
John Nathan Hostettler 33%
Kenny Hulshof 33%
Duncan Hunter 33%
Kay Hutchison 100%
Henry Hyde 33%
Daniel Inouye 100%
Ernest Istook, Jr. 33%
Jesse Jackson, Jr. 67%
William Jefferson 67%
James Merrill Jeffords 0%
William Lewis Jenkins 33%
Nancy Johnson 33%
Tim Johnson 33%
Paul Kanjorski 100%
Ric Keller 33%
Sue Kelly 33%
Edward Kennedy, Sr. 0%
Mark Kennedy 33%
Patrick Kennedy 100%
Dale Kildee 100%
Carolyn Kilpatrick 67%
Joseph Knollenberg 33%
Herb Kohl 100%
James Kolbe 33%
Dennis Kucinich 67%
Jon Kyl 100%
Ray LaHood 33%
Tom Lantos 100%
Steve LaTourette 33%
Frank Lautenberg 0%
James Leach 33%
Jerry Lewis 33%
Ron Lewis 33%
Joe Lieberman 0%
Blanche Lincoln 100%
John Linder 0%
Trent Lott, Sr. 100%
Dick Lugar 100%
Don Manzullo 33%
Jim Marshall 67%
Robert Matsui 100%
Thaddeus McCotter 33%
James McCrery III 33%
John McHugh 33%
Michael McNulty 100%
Martin Meehan 100%
Kendrick Meek, Sr. 100%
Juanita Millender-McDonald 100%
Brad Miller 100%
Alan Mollohan 100%
Dennis Moore 100%
Jack Murtha 100%
Marilyn Musgrave 0%
Sue Myrick 33%
Ben Nelson 100%
Robert William Ney 33%
Anne Northup 33%
Charles Norwood, Jr. 33%
James Nussle 33%
Jim Oberstar 100%
Dave Obey 100%
John Olver 100%
Solomon Ortiz, Sr. 100%
Thomas William Osborne 33%
Major Owens 100%
Michael Oxley 0%
Ron Paul 33%
Donald Payne 33%
John Peterson 33%
Charles Pickering, Jr. 33%
Todd Platts 33%
Richard Pombo 33%
Earl Pomeroy 67%
Jon Porter, Sr. 33%
Deborah Pryce 33%
George Radanovich 33%
James Ramstad 0%
Ralph Regula 33%
Denny Rehberg 33%
Richard Renzi 33%
Silvestre Reyes 100%
Thomas Reynolds 33%
Mike Ross 100%
Steve Rothman 100%
Jim Ryun 0%
Martin Olav Sabo 100%
Rick Santorum 100%
Paul Sarbanes 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top