State Office Name Party Rating
MS State House-7 Wanda Jennings R 30%
MS State House-10 Nolan Mettetal R 63%
MS State House-16 Stephen Holland D 70%
MS State House-27 Ferr Smith D 90%
MS State House-29 Linda Coleman D 88%
MS State House-30 Robert Huddleston D 100%
MS State House-31 Sara Thomas D 90%
MS State House-32 Willie Perkins, Sr. D 100%
MS State House-33 Thomas Reynolds II D 89%
MS State House-38 Tyrone Ellis D 100%
MS State House-39 Jeffrey Smith R 20%
MS State House-42 Reecy Dickson D 90%
MS State House-46 Bobby Howell R 30%
MS State House-49 Willie Bailey D 90%
MS State House-51 Rufus Straughter D 89%
MS State House-53 Robert Moak D 100%
MS State House-57 Edward Blackmon, Jr. D 100%
MS State House-58 Rita Martinson R 10%
MS State House-60 John Moore R 20%
MS State House-61 Ray Rogers R 60%
MS State House-62 Tom Weathersby, Sr. R 50%
MS State House-64 Bill Denny, Jr. R 0%
MS State House-65 Mary Coleman D 90%
MS State House-67 Earle Banks D 80%
MS State House-69 Alyce Clarke D 100%
MS State House-70 James Evans D 90%
MS State House-79 Blaine Eaton II D 50%
MS State House-85 America Middleton D 90%
MS State House-87 Johnny Stringer D 30%
MS State House-89 C. Shows R 33%
MS State House-90 Joseph Warren D 40%
MS State House-94 Robert Johnson III D 75%
MS State House-98 David Myers D 100%
MS State House-103 Percy Watson D 90%
MS State House-106 Herbert Frierson R 33%
MS State House-108 Mark Formby R 20%
MS State House-112 John Read R 10%
MS State Senate-3 Nickey Browning R 71%
MS State Senate-7 Hob Bryan D 100%
MS State Senate-9 Gray Tollison R 75%
MS State Senate-13 Willie Simmons D 75%
MS State Senate-14 Lydia Chassaniol R 29%
MS State Senate-24 David Jordan D 75%
MS State Senate-26 John Horhn D 86%
MS State Senate-27 Hillman Frazier D 100%
MS State Senate-30 Dean Kirby R 25%
MS State Senate-31 Terry Burton R 63%
MS State Senate-32 Sampson Jackson II D 88%
MS State Senate-50 Tommy Gollott R 63%
MS Supervisor-3 Dirk Dedeaux 50%
MS Public Service Commissioner Lynn Posey R 75%
Jim Crawley Barnett 44%
Lester Barnett, Jr. 10%
Barbara Blackmon 88%
William Bowles 60%
Billy Broomfield 90%
Thomas Cameron III 11%
William Ward Canon 0%
Charles Wilson Capps, Jr. 11%
Neely Carlton 75%
Robert Clark, Jr. 63%
Joseph Compretta 56%
Scottie Cuevas 88%
Ricky Cummings 80%
Lee Jarrell Davis 30%
Bob Dearing 88%
George Dickerson 50%
James Ellington 30%
Joe Ellzey 40%
Ronald David Farris 38%
George Flaggs, Jr. 70%
Timothy Alan Ford 38%
Jamie Franks, Jr. 44%
Frances Fredericks 89%
Vernon Delma Furniss 88%
Jack Gadd 70%
David Gibbs 60%
Carl Gordon, Jr. 57%
David Green 70%
Joe Grist, Jr. 67%
Daniel Guice, Jr. 20%
Edwin Glenn Hamilton 13%
Frank Hamilton 30%
Alice Harden 88%
Clayton Henderson 90%
William Hewes III 13%
Tommy Horne 30%
Joe Hudson 50%
Roger Ishee 40%
Michael Janus 43%
Tim Johnson 0%
Andrew Ketchings 11%
Ezell Lee 100%
Travis Little 25%
R.L. Livingston 88%
Bennett Malone 80%
Percy Maples 20%
James Markham, Jr. 40%
Warner McBride 40%
William McCoy 40%
William Miles 40%
William Minor 0%
Thomas Mitchell 20%
T.O. Moffatt 0%
Keith Norris Montgomery, Sr. 20%
Robert Moody 40%
E. Harvey Moss 78%
Clem Mullins Nettles 60%
Alan Nunnelee 13%
Diane Peranich 60%
John Raymond Reeves 30%
Thomas Robertson 0%
Valeria Brower Robertson 40%
Eric Robinson 40%
Walter Robinson, Jr. 80%
Charles Ross 13%
Clinton Rotenberry, Jr. 40%
Vincent Scoper, Jr. 13%
Eloise Hale Scott 56%
James Simpson, Jr. 22%
Charles Smith 22%
Clayton Smith 30%
Robert Harold Smith 75%
Mary Stevens 10%
Joseph Thomas Stogner 38%
Bobby Taylor 60%
Billy Thames 75%
Jimmy Thornton 80%
Bennie Turner 100%
Tom Wallace 100%
Johnnie Walls, Jr. 86%
Carmen Wells-Smith 30%
Phillip West 90%
John Robert White 71%
Richard White 0%
Tommy Woods 20%
Charles Young, Sr. 80%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.