State Office Name Party Rating
MS State House-10 Nolan Mettetal R 40%
MS State House-16 Stephen Holland D 57%
MS State House-27 Ferr Smith D 83%
MS State House-29 Linda Coleman D 71%
MS State House-30 Robert Huddleston D 86%
MS State House-32 Willie Perkins, Sr. D 86%
MS State House-33 Thomas Reynolds II D 83%
MS State House-38 Tyrone Ellis D 100%
MS State House-39 Jeffrey Smith R 29%
MS State House-42 Reecy Dickson D 100%
MS State House-46 Bobby Howell R 0%
MS State House-49 Willie Bailey D 67%
MS State House-51 Rufus Straughter D 100%
MS State House-53 Robert Moak D 100%
MS State House-57 Edward Blackmon, Jr. D 71%
MS State House-58 Rita Martinson R 14%
MS State House-60 John Moore R 0%
MS State House-61 Ray Rogers R 33%
MS State House-62 Tom Weathersby, Sr. R 43%
MS State House-64 Bill Denny, Jr. R 0%
MS State House-65 Mary Coleman D 71%
MS State House-67 Earle Banks D 100%
MS State House-69 Alyce Clarke D 50%
MS State House-70 James Evans D 100%
MS State House-79 Blaine Eaton II D 57%
MS State House-85 America Middleton D 71%
MS State House-87 Johnny Stringer D 67%
MS State House-89 C. Shows R 71%
MS State House-90 Joseph Warren D 43%
MS State House-94 Robert Johnson III D 80%
MS State House-98 David Myers D 83%
MS State House-103 Percy Watson D 100%
MS State House-106 Herbert Frierson R 67%
MS State House-108 Mark Formby R 0%
MS State House-112 John Read R 20%
MS State Senate-3 Nickey Browning R 57%
MS State Senate-7 Hob Bryan D 57%
MS State Senate-9 Gray Tollison R 71%
MS State Senate-13 Willie Simmons D 83%
MS State Senate-14 Lydia Chassaniol R 43%
MS State Senate-24 David Jordan D 100%
MS State Senate-26 John Horhn D 100%
MS State Senate-27 Hillman Frazier D 100%
MS State Senate-30 Dean Kirby R 14%
MS State Senate-31 Terry Burton R 67%
MS State Senate-32 Sampson Jackson II D 86%
MS State Senate-50 Tommy Gollott R 71%
MS Supervisor-3 Dirk Dedeaux 57%
MS Public Service Commissioner Lynn Posey R 67%
Lester Barnett, Jr. 0%
Barbara Blackmon 100%
William Bowles 29%
Billy Broomfield 86%
Thomas Cameron III 14%
William Ward Canon 0%
Charles Wilson Capps, Jr. 43%
Neely Carlton 71%
Robert Clark, Jr. 60%
Joseph Compretta 75%
Scottie Cuevas 86%
Ricky Cummings 71%
Lee Jarrell Davis 17%
Bob Dearing 57%
George Dickerson 43%
James Ellington 0%
Joe Ellzey 71%
Ronald David Farris 83%
George Flaggs, Jr. 100%
Timothy Alan Ford 33%
Jamie Franks, Jr. 86%
Frances Fredericks 100%
Vernon Delma Furniss 86%
Jack Gadd 71%
David Gibbs 83%
Carl Gordon, Jr. 67%
David Green 86%
Joe Grist, Jr. 57%
Daniel Guice, Jr. 43%
Edwin Glenn Hamilton 67%
Frank Hamilton 33%
Alice Harden 100%
Clayton Henderson 100%
William Hewes III 43%
Tommy Horne 57%
Joe Hudson 57%
Michael Janus 33%
Tim Johnson 0%
Andrew Ketchings 14%
Ezell Lee 80%
Travis Little 33%
R.L. Livingston 71%
Bennett Malone 71%
Percy Maples 71%
Warner McBride 43%
William McCoy 43%
William Minor 14%
Thomas Mitchell 50%
T.O. Moffatt 43%
Keith Norris Montgomery, Sr. 0%
Robert Moody 29%
E. Harvey Moss 71%
Clem Mullins Nettles 71%
Alan Nunnelee 33%
Diane Peranich 71%
John Raymond Reeves 71%
Thomas Robertson 43%
Valeria Brower Robertson 14%
Eric Robinson 29%
Walter Robinson, Jr. 100%
Clinton Rotenberry, Jr. 29%
Vincent Scoper, Jr. 14%
Eloise Hale Scott 29%
James Simpson, Jr. 14%
Charles Smith 14%
Robert Harold Smith 67%
Mary Stevens 29%
Joseph Thomas Stogner 57%
Bobby Taylor 71%
Billy Thames 100%
Jimmy Thornton 100%
Bennie Turner 100%
Tom Wallace 71%
Johnnie Walls, Jr. 100%
Carmen Wells-Smith 17%
John Robert White 86%
Richard White 0%
Tommy Woods 14%
Charles Young, Sr. 57%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.