Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: Nuclear Age Peace Foundation

2004 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
James Nussle 33%
Jim Oberstar 67%
Dave Obey 100%
John Olver 67%
Solomon Ortiz, Sr. 67%
Thomas William Osborne 33%
Major Owens 100%
Michael Oxley 0%
Ed Pastor 67%
Ron Paul 33%
Donald Payne 100%
John Peterson 0%
Tom Petri 67%
Charles Pickering, Jr. 33%
Todd Platts 33%
Richard Pombo 33%
Earl Pomeroy 100%
Jon Porter, Sr. 67%
Deborah Pryce 33%
Mark Pryor 100%
George Radanovich 67%
Nick Rahall II 50%
James Ramstad 33%
Ralph Regula 33%
Denny Rehberg 33%
Richard Renzi 67%
Silvestre Reyes 33%
Thomas Reynolds 33%
Jay Rockefeller IV 100%
Mike Rogers 33%
Mike Ross 67%
Steve Rothman 67%
Jim Ryun 33%
Martin Olav Sabo 67%
Rick Santorum 0%
Paul Sarbanes 100%
Jim Saxton 33%
John Shadegg 67%
E. Clay Shaw, Jr. 33%
Christopher Shays 67%
Donald Sherwood 33%
Robert Ruhl Simmons 100%
Ike Skelton 100%
Gordon Smith 0%
Olympia Snowe 33%
Vic Snyder 100%
Mark Souder 33%
Arlen Specter 0%
John Spratt, Jr. 67%
Pete Stark 100%
Cliff Stearns 33%
Ted Stevens 0%
Ted Strickland 100%
Bart Stupak 67%
John Sullivan 67%
John Sununu 0%
John Sweeney 33%
James Talent 0%
Tom Tancredo 33%
John Tanner 67%
Ellen Tauscher 67%
Charles Taylor 33%
Gene Taylor 100%
Lee Terry 33%
Craig Thomas 0%
William Thomas 33%
Todd Tiahrt 33%
John Tierney 100%
Ed Towns 67%
Stephanie Tubbs Jones 100%
Mark Udall 100%
George Voinovich 0%
James Walsh 33%
Zach Wamp 33%
John Warner 0%
Diane Watson 100%
Mel Watt 67%
Henry Waxman 100%
Anthony Weiner 100%
David Weldon 33%
W. Curtis Weldon 33%
Gerald Weller 67%
Robert Wexler 100%
Heather Wilson 67%
Frank Wolf 33%
Lynn Woolsey 100%
David Wu 100%
Albert Wynn 67%
Bill Young 0%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top