Search Form
First, enter a politician or zip code
Now, choose a category

Special Interest Groups

Rating Group: PeacePAC

1997-1998 Positions

State Office District Name Party Rating
Gary Ackerman 75%
Thomas Allen 88%
Rob Andrews 50%
Bill Archer 25%
Richard Armey 0%
Richard Hugh Baker 0%
Cass Ballenger 25%
James Barcia 50%
Bob Barr, Jr. 0%
Bill Barrett 0%
Roscoe Bartlett 0%
Charlie Bass 25%
Herbert Bateman 25%
Kenneth Bentsen, Jr. 88%
Douglas Bereuter 38%
Howard Berman 88%
Marion Berry 75%
Brian Bilbray 13%
Michael Bilirakis 0%
Rod Blagojevich 88%
Thomas Bliley, Jr. 0%
Sherwood Boehlert 38%
Henry Bonilla 0%
David Edward Bonior 100%
Mary Bono Mack 0%
Robert Borski, Jr. 63%
Leonard Boswell 63%
Rick Boucher 75%
Allen Boyd, Jr. 75%
George Brown, Jr. 75%
Ed Bryant 0%
Dan Burton 0%
Steve Buyer 0%
Herbert Callahan 13%
Thomas Campbell 63%
FL Justice of the Supreme Court Charles Canady 0%
Chris Cannon 0%
Julia Carson 88%
Mike Castle 38%
Helen Chenoweth-Hage 13%
William Clay, Sr. 63%
Eva Clayton 88%
Robert Clement 63%
Michael Collins 13%
Larry Combest 13%
Gary Condit 38%
Merrill Cook 0%
John Cooksey 0%
Jerry Costello 88%
Christopher Cox 0%
William Coyne 100%
Robert Cramer 13%
Philip Crane 0%
Barbara Cubin 0%
Randall Cunningham 0%
Patsy Ann Danner 50%
James Davis 88%
Thomas Davis III 13%
Bill Delahunt 100%
Thomas DeLay 0%
Peter Deutsch 75%
Lincoln Diaz-Balart 0%
Jay Dickey 0%
Norm Dicks 63%
Julian Dixon 63%
Calvin Dooley 75%
John Doolittle 0%
David Dreier 13%
Jennifer Dunn 13%
Chet Edwards 63%
Vern Ehlers 50%
Bob Ehrlich, Jr. 13%
Jo Ann Emerson 0%
Philip English 38%
Bob Etheridge 38%
Lane Evans 100%
Terry Everett 0%
Thomas Ewing 13%
Bob Filner 88%
Mark Foley 38%
Michael Patrick Forbes 13%
Harold Ford, Jr. 88%
Vito Fossella, Jr. 0%
Tillie Fowler 13%
Barney Frank 100%
Robert Franks 50%
Jonas Frost III 63%
Elton Gallegly 13%
John Ganske 38%
Sam Gejdenson 75%
George Gekas 0%
Richard Andrew Gephardt 75%
Jim Gibbons 0%
Wayne Gilchrest 25%
Paul Gillmor 13%
Benjamin Gilman 13%
Newt Gingrich 0%
Virgil Goode, Jr. 25%
William Goodling 13%
Bart Gordon 50%
Porter Goss 13%
James Greenwood 63%
Gilbert Gutknecht 38%
Tony Hall 75%
James Hansen 0%
J. Dennis Hastert 13%
J.D. Hayworth, Jr. 0%
Joel Hefley 0%
Wally Herger, Jr. 0%
Rick Hill 0%
Van Hilleary 0%
Earl Hilliard, Jr. 100%
Maurice Hinchey 88%
David Lee Hobson 25%
Pete Hoekstra 38%
Thomas Holden 50%
Darlene Hooley 100%
Stephen Horn 38%
John Nathan Hostettler 0%
Amory Houghton, Jr. 50%
Kenny Hulshof 0%
Duncan Hunter 0%
Asa Hutchinson 0%
Henry Hyde 38%
Ernest Istook, Jr. 13%
Jesse Jackson, Jr. 100%
William Jefferson 50%
William Lewis Jenkins 0%
Christopher John 50%
Nancy Johnson 38%
Paul Kanjorski 100%
Sue Kelly 38%
Patrick Kennedy 75%
Dale Kildee 88%
Carolyn Kilpatrick 100%
Gerald Kleczka 100%
Ronald Klink 75%
Joseph Knollenberg 13%
James Kolbe 50%
Dennis Kucinich 100%
John LaFalce 100%
Ray LaHood 13%
Nicholas Lampson 88%
Tom Lantos 100%
Stephen Largent 13%
Steve LaTourette 38%
Rick Lazio 25%
James Leach 88%
Jerry Lewis 13%
Ron Lewis 0%
John Linder 13%
William Lipinski 25%
Robert Livingston 13%
William Luther 100%
James Maloney 50%
Don Manzullo 0%
Matthew Martinez 50%
Frank Mascara 75%
Robert Matsui 75%
Karen McCarthy 100%
Bill McCollum 0%
James McCrery III 0%
John McHugh 13%
Scott McInnis 0%
David McIntosh 13%
Cynthia Ann McKinney 100%
Michael McNulty 75%
Martin Meehan 100%
Carrie Meek 63%
Jack Metcalf 25%
Juanita Millender-McDonald 63%
Dan Miller 25%
David Minge 100%
Patsy Takemoto Mink 100%
John Moakley 75%
Alan Mollohan 50%
Constance Morella 100%
Jack Murtha 25%
Sue Myrick 0%
George Nethercutt, Jr. 0%
Robert William Ney 13%
Anne Northup 13%
Charles Norwood, Jr. 13%
James Nussle 38%
Jim Oberstar 88%
Dave Obey 100%
John Olver 88%
Solomon Ortiz, Sr. 50%
Major Owens 100%
Michael Oxley 25%
Ronald Packard 0%
Ron Paul 50%
Donald Payne 100%
Edward Pease 13%
John Peterson 0%
Charles Pickering, Jr. 0%
Owen Pickett 50%
Richard Pombo 0%
Earl Pomeroy 63%
John Edward Porter 75%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.

Skip to top
Back to top