Rating Group: The Wisconsin Prosperity Project

2003-2004 Positions

State Office Name Party Rating
WI U.S. House-2 Mark Pocan D 11%
WI U.S. House-4 Gwen Moore D 41%
WI State Assembly-1 Garey Bies R 100%
WI State Assembly-3 Alvin Ott R 100%
WI State Assembly-9 Josh Zepnick D 41%
WI State Assembly-16 Leon Young D 43%
WI State Assembly-19 Jon Richards D 23%
WI State Assembly-20 Christine Sinicki D 50%
WI State Assembly-27 Steven Kestell R 100%
WI State Assembly-33 Stephen Nass R 100%
WI State Assembly-55 Dean Kaufert R 88%
WI State Assembly-59 Daniel LeMahieu R 100%
WI State Assembly-70 Amy Vruwink D 47%
WI State Assembly-77 Terese Berceau D 18%
WI State Assembly-80 Sondy Pope D 35%
WI State Assembly-87 Mary Williams R 88%
WI State Senate-1 Frank Lasee R 100%
WI State Senate-2 Robert Cowles R 100%
WI State Senate-3 Timothy Carpenter D 35%
WI State Senate-4 Lena Taylor D 41%
WI State Senate-5 Leah Vukmir R 100%
WI State Senate-8 Alberta Darling R 100%
WI State Senate-9 Joseph Leibham R 100%
WI State Senate-10 Sheila Harsdorf R 100%
WI State Senate-11 Neal Kedzie R 100%
WI State Senate-13 Scott Fitzgerald R 100%
WI State Senate-14 Luther Olsen R 100%
WI State Senate-16 Mark Miller D 23%
WI State Senate-17 Dale Schultz R 100%
WI State Senate-19 Michael Ellis R 100%
WI State Senate-20 Glenn Grothman R 93%
WI State Senate-21 John Lehman D 18%
WI State Senate-22 Robert Wirch D 41%
WI State Senate-24 Julie Lassa D 68%
WI State Senate-25 Robert Jauch D 52%
WI State Senate-26 Fred Risser D 29%
WI State Senate-27 Jon Erpenbach D 47%
WI State Senate-28 Mary Lazich R 100%
WI State Senate-29 Jerry Petrowski R 88%
WI State Senate-30 Dave Hansen D 70%
WI State Senate-32 Jennifer Shilling D 62%
WI Supervisor-10 John Ainsworth 100%
WI Supervisor-13 Joe Plouff 29%
WI Public Service Commission Chair Phil Montgomery 100%
WI Railroad Commissioner Jeffrey Plale D 75%
WI Secretary of Transportation Mark Gottlieb R 100%
Sheryl Albers 93%
Larry Balow 66%
Spencer Black 17%
Frank Boyle 25%
Roger Breske 64%
Ron Brown 100%
Charles Chvala 35%
G. Spencer Coggs 63%
Pedro Colon 43%
David Cullen 33%
Russell Decker 35%
Jeff Fitzgerald 100%
Steven Foti 100%
Stephen Freese 94%
Donald Friske 100%
John Gard 100%
Curt Gielow 100%
Barbara Gronemus 64%
Scott Gunderson 100%
Mark Gundrum 100%
Eugene Hahn 100%
Tom Hebl 56%
J.A. Hines 100%
Mark Honadel 100%
Gregory Huber 47%
Mary Hubler 47%
Michael Huebsch 100%
Jean Hundertmark 100%
Scott Richard Jensen 100%
Suzanne Jeskewitz 94%
DuWayne Johnsrud 87%
Theodore Kanavas 100%
Judy Krawczyk 100%
Robin Kreibich 100%
James Kreuser 52%
Shirley Krug 29%
Margaret Krusick 58%
Bonnie Ladwig 100%
Alan Lasee 100%
Michael Lehman 82%
Gabe Loeffelholz 100%
Thomas Lothian 100%
Terri McCormick 100%
Dan Meyer 100%
Mark Meyer 64%
Louis Molepske, Jr. 40%
Johnnie Morris 29%
Terry Musser 94%
Ann Nischke 100%
Carol Owens 100%
Mary Panzer 100%
Mark Pettis 94%
Michael Powers 100%
Tom Reynolds 94%
Kitty Rhoades 94%
Judith Robson 41%
Carol Roessler 100%
Marlin Schneider 41%
Dan Schooff 52%
Lorraine Seratti 100%
Gary Sherman 41%
Tony Staskunas 64%
John Steinbrink 52%
Cathy Stepp 100%
Jeffrey Stone 100%
Scott Suder 92%
Barbara Toles 50%
Debra Towns 100%
John Townsend 100%
David Travis 17%
Robert Turner 41%
Gregg Underheim 94%
Terry Van Akkeren 56%
Karl Van Roy 100%
Daniel Vrakas 100%
David Ward 100%
Sheldon Wasserman 58%
Becky Weber 100%
Robert Welch 100%
Steve Wieckert 100%
Annette Williams 33%
Jeffrey Wood 94%
Wayne Wood 50%
Robert Ziegelbauer 88%
David Zien 100%

How to Interpret these Evaluations

Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.

Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.