| State | Office | District | Name | Party | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WY | U.S. Senate | Jr | John Barrasso | Republican | 100% |
| WY | State House | 1 | Mark Semlek | Republican | 93% |
| WY | State House | 14 | Kermit Brown | Republican | 100% |
| WY | State House | 17 | Stephen Watt | Republican | 100% |
| WY | State House | 18 | Kathleen Davison | Republican | 86% |
| WY | State House | 23 | Keith Gingery | Republican | 93% |
| WY | State House | 26 | Elaine Harvey | Republican | 78% |
| WY | State House | 31 | Tom Lubnau II | Republican | 80% |
| WY | State House | 33 | Patrick Goggles | Democratic | 93% |
| WY | State House | 36 | Gerald Gay | Republican | 93% |
| WY | State House | 37 | Steve Harshman | Republican | 85% |
| WY | State House | 43 | Daniel Zwonitzer | Republican | 93% |
| WY | State House | 51 | Rosie Berger | Republican | 93% |
| WY | State House | 55 | David Miller | Republican | 73% |
| WY | State House | 57 | Thomas Lockhart | Republican | 100% |
| WY | State Senate | 2 | James Anderson | Republican | 93% |
| WY | State Senate | 3 | Curt Meier | Republican | 86% |
| WY | State Senate | 4 | Tony Ross | Republican | 100% |
| WY | State Senate | 6 | Wayne Johnson | Republican | 93% |
| WY | State Senate | 8 | Floyd Esquibel | Democratic | 93% |
| WY | State Senate | 10 | Philip Nicholas | Republican | 93% |
| WY | State Senate | 13 | John Hastert | Democratic | 100% |
| WY | State Senate | 14 | Stan Cooper | Republican | 100% |
| WY | State Senate | 18 | Henry Coe | Republican | 80% |
| WY | State Senate | 19 | Ray Peterson | Republican | 100% |
| WY | State Senate | 20 | Gerald Geis | Republican | 86% |
| WY | State Senate | 21 | Bruce Burns | Republican | 93% |
| WY | State Senate | 22 | John Schiffer | Republican | 86% |
| WY | State Senate | 23 | John Hines | Republican | 80% |
| WY | State Senate | 24 | Michael Von Flatern | Republican | 85% |
| WY | State Senate | 25 | Cale Case | Republican | 53% |
| WY | State Senate | 30 | Charles Scott | Republican | 66% |
| Deborah Alden | 86% | ||||
| Rodney Anderson | 93% | ||||
| Patricia Aullman | 93% | ||||
| George Bagby | 100% | ||||
| Bruce Barnard | 100% | ||||
| Tex Boggs | 93% | ||||
| Bob Brechtel | 86% | ||||
| Edward Buchanan | 93% | ||||
| Kurt Bucholz | 86% | ||||
| Charles Childers | 100% | ||||
| Roy Cohee | 100% | ||||
| Ken Decaria | 73% | ||||
| Ross Diercks | 100% | ||||
| David Edwards | 85% | ||||
| Mary Meyer Gilmore | 80% | ||||
| James Hageman | 93% | ||||
| Debbie Hammons | 93% | ||||
| John Hanes | 93% | ||||
| Bill Hawks | 86% | ||||
| Becket Hinckley | 86% | ||||
| Jerry Iekel | 93% | ||||
| Peter Illoway | 93% | ||||
| Burke Jackson | 84% | ||||
| Kit Jennings | 86% | ||||
| Rae Lynn Job | 93% | ||||
| Alan Jones | 85% | ||||
| Peter Jorgensen | 100% | ||||
| Jack Landon, Jr. | 93% | ||||
| Grant Larson | 100% | ||||
| Frank Latta | 72% | ||||
| Randall Luthi | 100% | ||||
| Marty Martin | 93% | ||||
| Mike Massie | 93% | ||||
| Del McOmie | 93% | ||||
| R. Larry Meuli | 80% | ||||
| E. Jayne Mockler | 86% | ||||
| Layton Morgan | 93% | ||||
| Monte Olsen | 93% | ||||
| Douglas Osborn | 100% | ||||
| Robert Peck | 100% | ||||
| Bryan Pedersen | 100% | ||||
| Owen Petersen | 100% | ||||
| Frank Philp | 92% | ||||
| Mick Powers | 100% | ||||
| Lorraine Quarberg | 93% | ||||
| Paul Wayne Reese | 92% | ||||
| Ann Robinson | 93% | ||||
| Doug Samuelson | 92% | ||||
| Kathryn Sessions | 86% | ||||
| Colin Simpson | 92% | ||||
| James Slater | 100% | ||||
| Bill Thompson | 93% | ||||
| Charles Townsend | 80% | ||||
| Bill Vasey | 93% | ||||
| Tom Walsh | 86% | ||||
| Jane Warren | 92% | ||||
| Jeff Wasserburger | 93% | ||||
| Kevin White | 93% |
Issues:
Business and Consumers
How to Interpret these Evaluations
Keep in mind that ratings done by special interest groups often do not represent a non-partisan stance. In addition, some groups select votes that tend to favor members of one political party over another, rather than choosing votes based solely on issues concerns. Nevertheless, they can be invaluable in showing where an incumbent has stood on a series of votes in the past one or two years, especially when ratings by groups on all sides of an issue are compared. Website links, if available, and descriptions of the organizations offering performance evaluations are accessible by clicking on the name of the group.
Most performance evaluations are displayed in a percentage format. However, some organizations present their ratings in the form of a letter grade or endorsement based on voting records, interviews, survey results and/or sources of campaign funding. For consistency and ease in understanding, Project Vote Smart converts all scores into a percentage when possible. Please visit the group's website or call 1-888-VOTESMART for more specific information.
